I'm sure many people had similar thoughts about the Sony Walkman before Apple released their first iPod.After 5 successful back to back home consoles though, I expect Sony will have more success in this market for a long time yet.
I'm sure many people had similar thoughts about the Sony Walkman before Apple released their first iPod.After 5 successful back to back home consoles though, I expect Sony will have more success in this market for a long time yet.
The PS3 had Haze. Checkmate.Any generation that had funded and released Concord is obviously the worst. So you’re saying you like Concord?
Sure, a hybrid handheld console directly competes with much more powerful home consoles. And convertible cars directly compete with SUVs because both are cars. As for PC, like I said, that is not an apples to apples comparison for multiple reasons, please re-read my previous post.Yes, Nintendo is direct competition with Sony since 1994. Them trying to carve a nich doesn't exclude them from being a competition.
PC is competition as clear as day.
So Xbox being relevant or not doesn't change this fact. Doesn't change anything tbh
Welcome to GAF.Hilarious how many people here judge a console generation by sales. Acting more like Sony execs than actual gamers. Also, celebrating the fact that PlayStation's direct competition is pretty much dying is incredibly stupid from the consumer's standpoint. But I guess people blinded by some ridiculous console wars just aren't capable of seeing it.
I'm sure many people had similar thoughts about the Sony Walkman before Apple released their first iPod.
Unfortunately, you'll get a bigger reply from the crickets than anyone looking to truly absorb this.We either have this energy with Nintendo or consider the Switch competition for PS5. There's no middle ground.
I mean, yeah? Why wouldn't you have the same energy with Nintendo? I forgot, they are best-known as the most consumer friendly company with great online services and reasonable prices.We either have this energy with Nintendo or consider the Switch competition for PS5. There's no middle ground.
I guess Sony does keep repeating the same mistake. Acquire a dev, let them make a shit game, then close them done.The PS3 had Haze. Checkmate.
Uh, that's the point...I mean, yeah? Why wouldn't you have the same energy with Nintendo? I forgot, they are best-known as the most consumer friendly company with great online services and reasonable prices.
The false reality that xbox was doing great collapsed around some people so now the false reality they're creating is that PS is doing really bad.
When did Sony own Free Radical? When did they close down after Haze failed?I guess Sony does keep repeating the same mistake. Acquire a dev, let them make a shit game, then close them done.
You know what, I might have been thinking of Lair.When did Sony own Free Radical? When did they close down after Haze failed?
Sony never owned Factor 5 either.I
You know what, I might have been thinking of Lair.
Fire all Trans cultists and DEI parasites. Done.But how would you go about fixing Sony if given the opportunity?
Which is not likely to happen. The only company that would have the potential would be Apple but they would have to heavily invest in studios to do it which I don’t think they would care to do. I think the future is going to be hybrid/console and PC base. Sony is the last console Brand that will be of what we know of as traditional console. The end game is a an open PC with a PlayStation logo slapped on it.It's not good news, another competition is needed for Playstation.
Someone post Sony financial charts that shows PS1,2,3,4 and 5 performance for this poor soul
Because this view is about as overblown as it gets.No idea how sony did this with some of the worst game out put ever for them
Then I stand corrected. They just continue to make exclusive deals with devs that ultimately regret it, like SE with Final Fantasy.Sony never owned Factor 5 either.
What bangers from sony came last year outside of Astro?Because this view is about as overblown as it gets.
Last time I checked, they released several bangers last year, the year before that, and the year prior as well. That Concord exists (the only thing anyone can really even point at when presenting this tired argument) doesn't negate all the other good that has come from their current device. Clearly the market agrees.
I don't follow "pro" "wrestling". Soap operas can be fun and all, but ehh, I have enough drama in my regular life. Having said that, that is a legit great sideways somersault or whachamacallit, the athleticism is awesome.But but it's worse than the PS3.
So..... one dev. And it's a dev who always complains about supposed "flops" no matter what the platform.Then I stand corrected. They just continue to make exclusive deals with devs that ultimately regret it, like SE with Final Fantasy.
It was Xbox 360’s success that led to us paying to play online. That competition can fuck right off.Because look at how Arrogant Sony is currently, it was better off with the competition that was Xbox 360.
Where did my post suggest Apple were going to enter a console race?Apple console any day now!
After seeing how Capcom’s games sold on its platforms I very much doubt it.
But please, for your own sanity, keep coping.
We're sincerely going to ignore Helldivers II and all of the other successful 3rd party deals and games they published?What bangers from sony came last year outside of Astro?
Huh? Not sure what are you trying to say. The post I replied to seemed to me like it's trying to say Switch directly competes with PS because most people don't seem to think Nintendo needs more competition.Uh, that's the point...
That's the point. He's saying, rightfully, that it's often slung only at Sony.I think it would be better for consumers if both Nintendo and PS had more competition.
How do scalpers influence anything when it is cumulative? The scalpers would have no effect on numbers today because they were converted to real users already. There is no real scalper stock of PS5 units right now. Especially in the US.Scalpers helped big time.
Half the people who bought it probably wouldn't have done so, until everybody wanted it.
That was like a 2 year period that gave Sony, Microsoft, Nvidia a big sales boost.
How do scalpers influence anything when it is cumulative? The scalpers would have no effect on numbers today because they were converted to real users already. There is no real scalper stock of PS5 units right now. Especially in the US.
Where did my post suggest Apple were going to enter a console race?
You were invoking a rose tinted view of Sony's past in the console space in order to predict an assured future of long term success for PlayStation. I was pointing out how a more innovative company spectacularly ate Sony's lunch overnight in a sector where they had previously been long term market leaders. That should certainly provide some pause for thought for someone who is as invested in PlayStation sales as you are.
That bubble is called earth, maybe you should come down to it once you deflate the gas from sniffing Sony's farts.lol sony is making bank because general public keep buying its stuff. break out of your weirdo bubble
No idea how sony did this with some of the worst game out put ever for them
Convenience. More than half of the base were PlayStation users in the last generation. I regret not having gone to PC Gaming sooner, because PlayStation is no longer worth it.No idea how sony did this with some of the worst game out put ever for them
360’s success is also what led to the birth of microtransactions on consoles. MS and Bethesda pioneered Horse Armor back in the day on the 360.It was Xbox 360’s success that led to us paying to play online. That competition can fuck right off.
The first 2 years were hindered by a chip shortage that lowered stock and revenue, not boost it. All the scalpers did was use it for profit. They don't have an effect on the retail revenue of the console. Their 'second hand' scalper prices are not included in the total.Like I said, gave a big boost the first 2 years.
Exxxxxxactly.Because the game is no longer available.
That's what happens when a fanbase give honest feedback and reject utter slop instead of shoveling it down and rallying behind it in the hope that one day they might accidentally shit out something that resembles a good game.
Why will most people need a PS6 etc to play their 3/4 forever games when in the near future they will be able to play them through a smart tv? More worryingly for Sony, in this hardware agnostic future where content is king, they have a vanishingly small number of relevant properties. Look at the top 20 monthly most played charts for evidence of this.There was nothing tying people to Walkman though, those CDs and Minidiscs could be played on devices by any company.
PlayStation locked many people in with digital downloads during the PS4 generation, hence why Phil Spencer has thrown in the towel on the console war.
If Microsoft couldn’t beat them, who could at this point?
The first 2 years were hindered by a chip shortage that lowered stock and revenue, not boost it. All the scalpers did was use it for profit. They don't have an effect on the retail revenue of the console. Their 'second hand' scalper prices are not included in the total.
From the threads here I've gathered that switch 2 is so powerful it's better than ps5 pro so that's where the hard-core are gonna be for gta6 ...GTA6 is basically a PS5 exclusive at this point
I mean, in such a broad sense pretty much every company selling some product is competing with each other. Still doesn't change the fact Xbox is/was the most direct competition for PlayStation and I don't get how can anyone think losing such competition can be a good thing. Well, I get it, it's because those people are "console warriors", but I still find it ridiculous.That's the point. He's saying, rightfully, that it's often slung only at Sony.
No matter what you consider, they are all competitors competing for your dollar. That's how this works. That Microsoft shit the bed doesn't make Nintendo, or Steam, any less of a competitor to PlayStation.
I'm talking sony studiosWe're sincerely going to ignore Helldivers II and all of the other successful 3rd party deals and games they published?
That tells me everything.
Also need the same energy with PC. Which supposedly isn't competing with PS and a "totally different market"...yet at the same time is going to completely take over PS marketshare and make consoles go extinct according to PCMR. Sounds like pretty serious competition then...
This was needed to be said for a long time.
Why will most people need a PS6 etc to play their 3/4 forever games when in the near future they will be able to play them through a smart tv? More worryingly for Sony, in this hardware agnostic future where content is king, they have a vanishingly small number of relevant properties. Look at the top 20 monthly most played charts for evidence of this.
I'm sure many people had similar thoughts about the Sony Walkman before Apple released their first iPod.
So why didn't it have the same affect on Xbox Series?Like I said, gave a big boost the first 2 years.
Scalping resulted in a scarcity effect; scalpers bought up stock, it was harder to come across, suddenly it gained a lot more attention, and everybody was trying to buy.
Because if that competition isn't actually competing, then what use is it? Xbox is far less of a threat than the next Switch for example. In the business, which is what these companies care about, Switch 2 can easily scoop PlayStation customers because they don't have to release the same types of games to be a notable competitor. Nintendo fans (and the industry at large) know what to expect from a Nintendo platform. Bangers. Very much like a PlayStation and what the PS6 will experience.I mean, in such a broad sense pretty much every company selling some product is competing with each other. Still doesn't change the fact Xbox is/was the most direct competition for PlayStation and I don't get how can anyone think losing such competition can be a good thing. Well, I get it, it's because those people are "console warriors", but I still find it ridiculous.
I mean, you can all cap SONY STUDIOS till your fingers fall off. Third party exclusives still help a console and clearly did so in 2024 for PS5. This is on top of the fact that the most critically acclaimed PS5 game (Astro) and best selling exclusive (Helldivers II) are both the properties of S O N Y S T U D I O S.I'm talking sony studios
Not third party. Not second party like the helldivers deal.
SONY STUDIOS
OH boy... Still waiting on these bangers you speak of.I mean, you can all cap SONY STUDIOS till your fingers fall off. Third party exclusives still help a console and clearly did so in 2024 for PS5. This is on top of the fact that the most critically acclaimed PS5 game (Astro) and best selling exclusive (Helldivers II) are both the properties of S O N Y S T U D I O S.
No one outside of forums like these gives a shit about 1st vs 2nd vs 3rd Party. They know that Helldivers II and Astro can only be enjoyed on one home console. That's what matters and why Sony is in this position (considering you claimed that you "didn't get why").
Yep. It's not a palatable thought for some of us but the mass market will decide.Cloud gaming
Says the guy who thinks that Series S will benefit more from GTA6 than PlayStation 5