ZehDon
Member
I understand your point, but I think we're getting two different interpretations from previous films. Luke lost to Vader because he was inexperienced and headstrong, while worrying about his friends. Anakin lost to Kenobi despite his training because he grew overconfident and angry. In neither fight was either combatant entirely inexperienced in both the use of a light sabre or the ways of the force. The comparison to Rey and Ren isn't either of these fights, because there is no equal comparison: an untrained force-strong person has never bested a trained force user - especially one of the Skywalker bloodline.Because Ren's emotional and physical state were compromised as well. Rey didn't just win because she's the hero. It's exactly the same thing, Ren got trained by Luke and a sith lord and it didn't mean jack because he was fucked up.
As for Ren's emotional and physical state, I will certainly agree he was weakened due to Chewie's deft shooting, however emotionally, Ren had just removed internal conflict. Given the visual story telling and dialogue during Han Solo's death scene, we know Ren shut out the light and embraced the dark side. If Ren was conflicted in his fight with Rey, then Han's death quite literally means nothing. At all. Which is an ever bigger sin than Rey's inexplicable force mastery.
For what it's worth, the issue isn't Rey using the force - it's the degree with which she is able to master it given the time frame and lack of training. Remove the mind trick scene and have Rey and Ren's dual end in a stalemate, and I wouldn't be posting in this thread at all. I can accept bascially everything else as simply "Star Wars has never had great characters". The six preceding films established the time and dedication required to use the force. Rey does it in a day. This is a fairly major flaw.
Edit:
The movie sets up a direct comparison with Vader both visually and narratively. This forces the audience to compare one to the other, and assume - even if incorrectly - comparable levels of force mastery and danger. Kylo Ren is a Sith in every way one can define a Sith. If you require an on-screen formal title of 'Sith' before accepting this, then you also must understand why people require an on-screen explanation of Rey's force mastery. As I mentioned before, the movie works to undermine Ren as the film progresses, and we can certainly accept what we see without direct explanation; he's young, inexperienced and conflicted. The actor conveys this better than any forced dialogue. Him speaking with Vader's helmet reveals his internal conflict between the dark and light sides of the force. Killing his father brings this conflict to a close. We know this because of the dialogue and visual story telling during that scene. If it doesn't end his conflict, that's a massive problem - far greater than what I'm talking about with Rey. Killing Han Solo for literally nothing is prequel levels of bad story telling. Anyway, back on topic: the audience is simply never shown why or how Rey is capable of such a mastery of the force. Given the required understanding of the previous films that TFA assumes, understanding the dedication and training required to use the force comes with that. It contradicts what every other film works to establish. It's a big flaw.He's not a sith. We also don't know just how "well trained" he is at this, either. He confesses to the helmet of his dead Grandfather that he keeps on a pedestal in his bedroom that he KEEPS slipping up, and Snoke straight up tells him facing his father, a non-force using old-ass man, is literally his greatest test.
His victories previously in the movie include catching a pilot off guard, slaughtering unarmed innocents, and killing an unarmed, old-ass man.
Now factor in that killing his dad apparently didn't even WORK the way he thought it would, and then he couldn't pause the blaster bolt telegraphed by Chewie's 3 second yelp, tell me how fully embraced by the dark side, how well trained Kylo really was as opposed to how well trained people just naturally give him credit for solely because he's the bad guy.