Is this the same character that, within the first 10 minutes gets captured by Kylo, tortured and gives away the info where bb-8 is?
THEN after getting rescued by Finn and gets away in a tie fighter gets shot down and crash lands on Jakku?!?
No, he's definitely no Gary/Mary Sue...
The definition of Mary Sue isn't so crucial as what people are trying to say when they throw around the term; namely, that Rey is a dull protagonist. She suffers from Hermione syndrome, in that, in an effort to make a heroine appeal to the female audience in a 'nerdy' piece of fiction, she's made super OP. In Harry Potter, the only thing to really suffer was Ron's character. In SW, as the lead, the hero's journey and overall arc suffers.
She can fight like a pro. She can pilot a spaceship on the first try and outmanuever the tie fighters. She knows the mechanics of the Falcon better than Han and Chewie. Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her. She gets a grip on the force in no time. Regarding the last one, I reject any suggestions to wait for the sequel for some potential backstory explanation as that is garbage storytelling.
Mary Sue, whatever, doesn't matter what it's called. The point is that the character is dull. She never fails once. Even at the points Kylie Ren appears to have the upper hand she just makes use of force abilities most of which Luke needed three films to pull off. The film is less engaging when the hero is sauntering through danger. This is storytelling 101 that's being swept under the rug for fear of appearing sexist I guess.
The definition of Mary Sue isn't so crucial as what people are trying to say when they throw around the term; namely, that Rey is a dull protagonist. She suffers from Hermione syndrome, in that, in an effort to make a heroine appeal to the female audience in a 'nerdy' piece of fiction, she's made super OP. In Harry Potter, the only thing to really suffer was Ron's character. In SW, as the lead, the hero's journey and overall arc suffers.
She can fight like a pro. She can pilot a spaceship on the first try and outmanuever the tie fighters. She knows the mechanics of the Falcon better than Han and Chewie. Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her. She gets a grip on the force in no time. Regarding the last one, I reject any suggestions to wait for the sequel for some potential backstory explanation as that is garbage storytelling.
Mary Sue, whatever, doesn't matter what it's called. The point is that the character is dull. She never fails once. Even at the points Kylie Ren appears to have the upper hand she just makes use of force abilities most of which Luke needed three films to pull off. The film is less engaging when the hero is sauntering through danger. This is storytelling 101 that's being swept under the rug for fear of appearing sexist I guess.
Damn, I haven't seen Star Wars yet but she sounds positively awful.
The definition of Mary Sue isn't so crucial as what people are trying to say when they throw around the term; namely, that Rey is a dull protagonist. She suffers from Hermione syndrome, in that, in an effort to make a heroine appeal to the female audience in a 'nerdy' piece of fiction, she's made super OP. In Harry Potter, the only thing to really suffer was Ron's character. In SW, as the lead, the hero's journey and overall arc suffers.
She can fight like a pro. She can pilot a spaceship on the first try and outmanuever the tie fighters. She knows the mechanics of the Falcon better than Han and Chewie. Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her. She gets a grip on the force in no time. Regarding the last one, I reject any suggestions to wait for the sequel for some potential backstory explanation as that is garbage storytelling.
Mary Sue, whatever, doesn't matter what it's called. The point is that the character is dull. She never fails once. Even at the points Kylie Ren appears to have the upper hand she just makes use of force abilities most of which Luke needed three films to pull off. The film is less engaging when the hero is sauntering through danger. This is storytelling 101 that's being swept under the rug for fear of appearing sexist I guess.
Rey is a little too close to being able to do absolutely anything with ease, but it's not as if Ridley plays her as such. There's doubt, fear and confusion to her credit, in addition to trust and responsibility issues at the beginning of the film.
I'm ok with Rey.
Rey is a little too close to being able to do absolutely anything with ease, but it's not as if Ridley plays her as such. There's doubt, fear and confusion to her credit, in addition to trust and responsibility issues at the beginning of the film.
I'm ok with Rey.
Don't get me wrong, I thought Daisy was great too. The character's problem was 100% with the writing. No acting could offset that.You see, I'm totally with you on almost everything in your post, but Neff here summed up my feelings on the character:
Daisey did a great job as Rey, so I'm ok with it.
How so?The funny thing is, Luke had very similar problems (not having enough character flaws, except maybe caring too much about his friends)
This is exactly how I feelRey is a little too close to being able to do absolutely anything with ease, but it's not as if Ridley plays her as such. There's doubt, fear and confusion to her credit, in addition to trust and responsibility issues at the beginning of the film.
I'm ok with Rey.
2. Gawked dorkily as Leia during EP4 rescue. Still dorked it up a bit in EP5.
It's nothing like that at all lolDamn, I haven't seen Star Wars yet but she sounds positively awful.
Also, if we can't use the term Mary Sue we still need a term for ultra-dull protagonists like Ciri from The Witcher 3 who just wreck narratives by drawing the whole story around their own flawless, dull selves. And Ciri is the best example of what I would consider a Mary Sue in a long time. Rey from Star Wars sounds similar.
I keep seeing people, regardless of whether they consider her a Mary Sue or not, saying that she never fails once at anything in the movie and always succeeds, like it's an inarguable fact. But I feel like she fails at least at one point in the movie, and it's a very important part as it sets up a parallel to the last fight and the overall arc of Kylo Ren's story.
Kylo is set up as this very powerful, very terrifying figure at the beginning of the movie. Both for the characters in the movie as well as for the audience. When Kylo Ren and Rey have their first fight, Rey is terrified. She's shooting her blaster all over the place, backing away, as he easily deflects shots and most of the shots seem to miss him wildly. He easily force-freezes her entire body and knocks her out, kidnapping her. This is Rey being absolutely defeated by Kylo Ren as if its nothing, because she's terrified of him and he is absolutely in control. She loses this fight. This feels to me like Rey failing at something ?
But then a major shift happens, when Kylo Ren starts reading Rey's mind and she is able to fight back and read some of his mind and realizes that Kylo Ren is scared himself, and says so. Kylo's power was mostly in his intimidation and the confidence that gave him. Taking off the mask, we see he isn't actually Darth Vader 2.0 but practically a kid and Rey learns this as well.
This therefore sets up the fight at the end when they meet again, this time Kylo Ren's facade has been cracked and Rey has newfound confidence and a lack of fear, a great parallel to their first encounter as we feel like we know both characters true selves better. Especially since the power of the force is all about one's mindset and emotion.
I just don't know how you can say she never failed at anything when you see her so easily defeated and captured when she first runs into Kylo Ren.
It's amazing the double standards being applied to Rey and not Luke. This same thing could be said for him, but it's only a problem for Rey.Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her.
how is it not?How is this even a flaw?
Well put... though maybe not garbage storytelling, just pandering (I need a better word) with her design and arc.The definition of Mary Sue isn't so crucial as what people are trying to say when they throw around the term; namely, that Rey is a dull protagonist. She suffers from Hermione syndrome, in that, in an effort to make a heroine appeal to the female audience in a 'nerdy' piece of fiction, she's made super OP. In Harry Potter, the only thing to really suffer was Ron's character. In SW, as the lead, the hero's journey and overall arc suffers.
She can fight like a pro. She can pilot a spaceship on the first try and outmanuever the tie fighters. She knows the mechanics of the Falcon better than Han and Chewie. Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her. She gets a grip on the force in no time. Regarding the last one, I reject any suggestions to wait for the sequel for some potential backstory explanation as that is garbage storytelling.
Mary Sue, whatever, doesn't matter what it's called. The point is that the character is dull. She never fails once. Even at the points Kylie Ren appears to have the upper hand she just makes use of force abilities most of which Luke needed three films to pull off. The film is less engaging when the hero is sauntering through danger. This is storytelling 101 that's being swept under the rug for fear of appearing sexist I guess.
They are a lot of ways they could had used to explain why Rey gets so good with the force so quickly, they choose to use none.I was also wondering if it isn't Kylo who awakes her Force. He seems to conect his mind to his victims when torturing them. What if there is some kind of bleeding effect that makes Rey subconciously aware of her Force powers?
It is the same with the saber. When coming in contact with stuff (from her past), her Force awakens.
I agree she gets realy powerfull really fast, but I didn't mind. I don't feel like she is a flat character at all.
What is this, the 90's? Being a dork is just a personality trait. It's like saying being a romantic is a virtue. It's just a part of who people are that makes them distinct, but not really good or bad except in very certain contexts. Usually, it doesn't matter. And how in the hell did it hurt him in the narrative? If he actually was suave and landed Leia in bed, he'd have gone into an incestuous relationship. Sounds like being less than James Bond helped him dodge a bullet there.how is it not?
How so?
1. Struggled with Jedi training under Kenobi. Struggled with Yoda. Poor force proficiency for a long time, such as no mind trick until EP6.
2. Gawked dorkily as Leia during EP4 rescue. Still dorked it up a bit in EP5.
3. Showed groan-inducing immaturity to Yoda.
4. Couldn't beat Darth Vader until 3rd movie, got destroyed in second.
5. Kenobi and Han did most of the legwork in EP4, including the bright ideas. Luke's only major contribution was with big help from Wedge, Han and Kenobi.
70s and 80s.What is this, the 90's?
WTF did I just read hahaBeing a dork is just a personality trait. It's like saying being a romantic is a virtue. It's just a part of who people are that makes them distinct, but not really good or bad except in very certain contexts. Usually, it doesn't matter. And how in the hell did it hurt him in the narrative? If he actually was suave and landed Leia in bed, he'd have gone into an incestuous relationship. Sounds like being less than James Bond helped him dodge a bullet there.
Immediately after Rey successfully pilots the falcon with such expertise, we cut to Snoke saying that there has been an "awakening." After she successfully resists Ren's mind attacks, Snoke wants Ren to bring her to him. When Rey escapes, Ren informs another trooper that the longer she resists capture, the more dangerous she becomes.They are a lot of ways they could had used to explain why Rey gets so good with the force so quickly, they choose to use none.
No,its 2016 almost. Get with the times. Even within the movie, it's not depicted as a negative thing.70s and 80s.
Well, spoiler alert, but Luke is actually Leia's brother. I can't imagine why you would think being dorkily and gawky to women is undesirable at all except for the purposes of getting with them, so if that's not what you meant, I have even less of an idea why what you described is a flaw than before.WTF did I just read haha
But she does fail. It's her fault that those monsters were set loose on Han's freighter. She gets Herself captured by Ren. Rey seems to be problematic for some simply because she overcame obstacles...like the hero in an adventure film. It seems your issue isn't that she doesn't fail. It's that she doesn't fail enough for your liking. Which is just a weird angle to me.The definition of Mary Sue isn't so crucial as what people are trying to say when they throw around the term; namely, that Rey is a dull protagonist. She suffers from Hermione syndrome, in that, in an effort to make a heroine appeal to the female audience in a 'nerdy' piece of fiction, she's made super OP. In Harry Potter, the only thing to really suffer was Ron's character. In SW, as the lead, the hero's journey and overall arc suffers.
She can fight like a pro. She can pilot a spaceship on the first try and outmanuever the tie fighters. She knows the mechanics of the Falcon better than Han and Chewie. Everyone but the villain is instantly fond of her. She gets a grip on the force in no time. Regarding the last one, I reject any suggestions to wait for the sequel for some potential backstory explanation as that is garbage storytelling.
Mary Sue, whatever, doesn't matter what it's called. The point is that the character is dull. She never fails once. Even at the points Kylie Ren appears to have the upper hand she just makes use of force abilities most of which Luke needed three films to pull off. The film is less engaging when the hero is sauntering through danger. This is storytelling 101 that's being swept under the rug for fear of appearing sexist I guess.
Immediately after Rey successfully pilots the falcon with such expertise, we cut to Snoke saying that there has been an "awakening." After she successfully resists Ren's mind attacks, Snoke wants Ren to bring her to him. When Rey escapes, Ren informs another trooper that the longer she resists capture, the more dangerous she becomes.
I'm not sure what else the movie could've done to tell audiences that she's extremely powerful in the force.
But she does fail. It's her fault that those monsters were set loose on Han's freighter. She gets Herself captured by Ren. Rey seems to be problematic for some simply because she overcame obstacles...like the hero in an adventure film. It seems your issue isn't that she doesn't fail. It's that she doesn't fail enough for your liking. Which is just a weird angle to me.
What are you talking about. Luke is a dork who is mocked as such throughout ANH.It's amazing the double standards being applied to Rey and not Luke. This same thing could be said for him, but it's only a problem for Rey.
Hm.
She also almost crashes the Falcon at first and can't figure out blasters. But maybe there should be more...
You could had read the second part of my post for example. What you mention is not different that the talent/power Anakin/Luke where supposed to have but Rey is far more talented/powerful than them. I don't have any problem with that but we could at least had Snoke saying something like "I have never felt before a power of that magnitude" or a "how is possible so fast?" by Ren. The film barely acknowledges she being the exception within the exceptional.Immediately after Rey successfully pilots the falcon with such expertise, we cut to Snoke saying that there has been an "awakening." After she successfully resists Ren's mind attacks, Snoke wants Ren to bring her to him. When Rey escapes, Ren informs another trooper that the longer she resists capture, the more dangerous she becomes.
I'm not sure what else the movie could've done to tell audiences that she's extremely powerful in the force.
But she does fail. It's her fault that those monsters were set loose on Han's freighter. She gets Herself captured by Ren. Rey seems to be problematic for some simply because she overcame obstacles...like the hero in an adventure film. It seems your issue isn't that she doesn't fail. It's that she doesn't fail enough for your liking. Which is just a weird angle to me.
I seem to recall that Han warms up to him, Leia and Chewie warm up to him, R2D2, Obi-Won, C3PO, and then he's loved by the entire Rebellion!What are you talking about. Luke is a dork who is mocked as such throughout ANH.
I still wonder if this First Order's General is metrosexual.
Edit: General Hux
I mean, look at him
If he isn't metro then idk
I have nothing against it but I would wanna know
The movie showed her exceptionality in a different way than you wanted. I'm sorry?You could had read the second part of my post for example. What you mention is not different that the talent/power Anakin/Luke where supposed to have but Rey is far more talented/powerful than them. I don't have any problem with that but we could at least had Snoke saying something like "I have never felt before a power of that magnitude" or a "how is possible so fast?" by Ren. The film barely acknowledges she being the exception within the exceptional.
Those don't seem to be failures in my opinion. They don't have long lasting effects because, even though they're mistakes, they work out for her. If she releases the monsters and, let's say, a monster eats Chewie's arm I would agree but her releasing the monsters saved them all just like how closing the door and releasing the gas would. She still made a mistake but the story portrays it as working out regardless so, really, she didn't fail at anything.
Letting the monsters loose is a happy coincidence. More importantly, it doesn't have a lasting effect on the character. Not like, say, getting one's hand chopped off by Vader or having one's home burned down by Stormtroopers. Her escape from Kylo Ten is also a cakewalk due to the OP force powers.But she does fail. It's her fault that those monsters were set loose on Han's freighter. She gets Herself captured by Ren. Rey seems to be problematic for some simply because she overcame obstacles...like the hero in an adventure film. It seems your issue isn't that she doesn't fail. It's that she doesn't fail enough for your liking. Which is just a weird angle to me.
They warm up to him at the end of the film. The Luke-Han relationship is gradual and well-paced. They spend a considerable amount of the film not seeing eye-to-eye. This is the kind of character conflict that TFA is missing with regards to the main character since it seems afraid to portray the hero as weak in any way.I seem to recall that Han warms up to him, Leia and Chewie warm up to him, R2D2, Obi-Won, C3PO, and then he's loved by the entire Rebellion!
And of course his aunt and uncle loved him too. Everybody loves Luke!
Thanks to the amazing insight of some in this thread, I now realize that the Jason Bourne series is complete garbage. I mean God. Bourne just keeps...succeeding. Awful. It's pretty clear his entire character was made to fulfill an agenda.
Right. So what were these long lasting failures that we saw Luke conduct in ANH again? What amputees did his actions create?
It seems that Kylo Ren's arc is more interesting to me after TFA. Rey is a bit of a bore.Letting the monsters loose is a happy coincidence. More importantly, it doesn't have a lasting effect on the character. Not like, say, getting one's hand chopped off by Vader or having one's home burned down by Stormtroopers. Her escape from Kylo Ten is also a cakewalk due to the OP force powers.
And yes, the fact she doesn't fail enough is my whole point. Her arc is a pretty basic action hero arc, but it fails at making the hero suffer to any significant degree, thus making their eventual triumph vastly less satisfying. Being captured by Ren is her only major slip-up, but it doesn't leave any lasting effect on the character. It's basic storytelling, and they screwed it up.
Thanks to the amazing insight of some in this thread, I now realize that the Jason Bourne series is complete garbage. I mean God. Bourne just keeps...succeeding. Awful. It's pretty clear his entire character was made to fulfill an agenda.
Why are you bringing Luke up with me? Oh... you think I find the Rey character good but not great because I'm a sexist. I didn't find Luke all that great either.
No one's saying Star Wars: The Force Awakens is a bad movie, they're just saying there's issues with the movie that don't make it 10/10. I enjoyed the movie. I think to some people who are really invested this is an attack on the movie.
She also almost crashes the Falcon at first and can't figure out blasters. But maybe there should be more...
There are a lot of people who are trying really hard to make this about her sex. It's a little disconcerting.
Those don't seem to be failures in my opinion. They don't have long lasting effects because, even though they're mistakes, they work out for her. If she releases the monsters and, let's say, a monster eats Chewie's arm I would agree but her releasing the monsters saved them all just like how closing the door and releasing the gas would. She still made a mistake but the story portrays it as working out regardless so, really, she didn't fail at anything.
If his assassin abilities materialised out of thin air instead being due to the fact he is an assassin you may have had a point.Thanks to the amazing insight of some in this thread, I now realize that the Jason Bourne series is complete garbage. I mean God. Bourne just keeps...succeeding. Awful. It's pretty clear his entire character was made to fulfill an agenda.