Kanbee-san
Member
Dan said:Shit man, Hitler made more compelling arguments than you do.
and your point ?
Dan said:Shit man, Hitler made more compelling arguments than you do.
Kanbee-san said:I personally like my GBASP equal to the GC and PS2. Xbox is somewhere behind there, since I take little interest in the console's offerings, such as Halo 2 and Fable.
I am not knocking your opinion, but you just sound like a nintendo fanboy. I cant see how playing pixelated, crippled portable games could compete with the likes of online, 3d rendered, 5.1 chanel imersive console games.
deadlifter said:There are people that prefer the GBA over consoles. One of the most informed posters on this gaming board does, in fact. So you are wrong there. We understand you don't like the GBA, that's fucking great.
Kanbee-san said:and your point ?
Kanbee-san said:Hey.... hold on. My hate isnt just for GBA's. It stems from the lynx. And just how "informed" can someone be if they prefer GBA's over consoles ? GBA games at best dont even rival the greatness of the SNES and its games.
Legend of Stafy 1-3, Advance Wars 1-2, Wario Ware, and about two dozen other games wish to strongly disagree.Kanbee-san said:GBA games at best dont even rival the greatness of the SNES and its games.
Project Midway said:
neptunes said:deadlifter, Kanbee-san, cvxfreak, etc....
why are you guys arguing?
Hitler Stole My Potato said:I see this has finally turned into your average GAF NPD thread - so ass fucking retarded it's giving me a headache.
Kudos on another job well done.
Kanbee-san said:In my opinion portable gaming is a disgrace to the word "video games". I must re-iterate, no one in their right mind would want a GBA over a console.
neptunes said:deadlifter, Kanbee-san, cvxfreak, etc....
why are you guys arguing?
Notorious said::lol
I don't know why people compare GBA sales with console sales. Is it some kind of Nintendroid damage control? A GBA is cheaper, of course it will sell better.
uh, GCN is cheaper, of course it will sell better...Notorious said::lol
I don't know why people compare GBA sales with console sales. Is it some kind of Nintendroid damage control? A GBA is cheaper, of course it will sell better.
SolidSnakex said:That's it. Pretty much whever the GC is doing badly, the GBA sales are brought up to damage control everything.
CVXFREAK said:Just justifying my opinion and complimenting our Handheld Emperor.
*shakes head*Kanbee-san said:In my opinion portable gaming is a disgrace to the word "video games". I must re-iterate, no one in their right mind would want a GBA over a console.
efralope said:uh, GCN is cheaper, of course it will sell better...
if only that were true...
It goes both ways. Some people act like the GC is all that matters to Nintendo, while others act like cross-subsidizing the GC with GBA sales is somehow a positive. None of it's terribly useful.CVXFREAK said:But don't a lot of people say Nintendo is doing badly?
snapty00 said:Nintendo's position in the industry nowadays is just so mind-blowing.
I mean, try to remember back in the 1980s and early 1990s. Nintendo was absolutely massive and dominant. Hell, even during the Nintendo 64 years, their games were still the most popular by far even though the PlayStation outsold the Nintendo 64 by quite a bit overall. Even at the end of the Nintendo 64 era, people -- even consumers who usually don't get into videogame "politics" -- looked at the Nintendo label as a source of near-invincibility in quality.
It's mind-boggling how they let that 1990s dominance totally slip away from them and made them go into a state of irrelevancy.
SolidSnakex said:That's it. Pretty much whever the GC is doing badly, the GBA sales are brought up to damage control everything.
Meier said:Sorry dude but your opinion's value went right out the window there. I'm 21, have been gaming since the 80s, have all consoles (and Xbox Live) and my SP is my favorite system. Anyone who says shit like you clearly has never played one -- of the top 5 games this gen, the SP is the most well-represented for me with Wario Ware and Mario and Luigi RPG.
Dan said:It goes both ways. Some people act like the GC is all that matters to Nintendo, while others act like cross-subsidizing the GC with GBA sales is somehow a positive. None of it's terribly useful.
awww... are the PS2 and XBox afraid of a little challenge...Chi-Town said:Here's an idea. Somebody startup a "Consoles VS Portables thread" and take the discussion there.
What can they really do realistically, though? :\Suranga3 said:Yeah, I can't believe how low those numbers are for Gamecube, I'm sure nintendo is not going to just stand idle on this matter.
From Dec. 03 NPD.unkasa said:I thought the Xbox HW numbers would be higher than that. It outpaced the PS2 by a nominal margin, which can be attributed to two factors: There is an ongoing shortage of PS2 units and the effect of saturation is finally taking hold of its monthly penetration. Star Ocean 3's numbers are the most impressive. Anyone know how Star Ocean 2 fared? Fable's posting isn't that much of a surprise. Given the dearth of quality role playing on the Xbox, it's no wonder that Fable, underwhelming as it is, pushed that many units. When word of its mediocrity spreads, though, I expect the number to taper off considerably.
unkasa said:Star Ocean 3's numbers are the most impressive.
snapty00 said:What can they really do realistically, though? :\
m0dus said:
Excuse me, sir, I'm from the NPD. The september sales are in.
Vaht de Hell? de noo En-Pee-deeh numbahs ah een. Leht's seeh.
Ooh noh. De Siduvashun ees degenerading fahst . . .
GEHD OUD!! GOOO! GEHD OOOOUD!
pointless, yes.
edit: found an even better quote ^-^
Catchpenny said:So you won't bring up the PS2 if PSP is trailing the DS in a year or two, right?
Who would care, though?Suranga3 said:Drop the price to $75 US.
Last gen, any RPG without the words "Final" and "Fantasy" in them had trouble getting over 300k. Square isn't the brand Final Fantasy is yet. EA is the only publishing brand that seems to sell games on it's own at this point. And even then, it doesn't do it very well.Catchpenny said:I've seen this sentiment several times in this thread and I can't really agree. This is Square Enix's flagship title for the year and had a substantial tv ad campaign. It was out for almost the entire month, a quarter of a million in sales should be expected. In fact, it pales in comparison to Fable.
Hopefully Dragon Quest can do better than this in America.
I would probably buy a Gamecube Nintendo if it dropped to $20/20. And if they throw in a free game and memory card, I would buy it for sure.snapty00 said:Who would care, though?
The price is already $50 or more cheaper than the competition, and people still aren't buying it.
Honestly, if the GameCube dropped to $20, would it really make a massive spike long-term? I really don't think it would. For about three months, I think you'd see a pretty big spike, but after about a year, I think we'd be right back where we are now.
I somewhat agree. though I played more video games in college than I did ever. But you are spot on about broke ass college kids. I played more games... a owend a lot less.etiolate said:Sometimes I wonder if it hurts Nintendo that the 'nintendo generation' is currently in their college years. Which means broke ass. Plus less free time. Which is maybe why their portables do great since they are normally cheaper and can be on the go and played in short intervals.
I know the "mature" market is what is constantly being talked about and advertised to, but everyone I know spent more time playing videogames during their teenage years than they do in their 20s and such. I don't think Nintendo is getting today's Teenager, let alone the older trend hoppers. The trend hoppers will dissapear soon, but the teenagers hang on.
SolidSnakex said:No, they aren't in the same market. If the PSP does bad it does bad. Comparing the PS2 to the DS or GBA won't make the PSP's sales look any better.