adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
It has been deleted since but the internet never forgets.

Oh shit, it's out in 10 days?
It Will beI hope this game is good. Silent Hill 2 remake was spectacular.
God i hope its good. Im on Cronos ng+ currently and loving it even more.Just finishing up Cronos, which I've loved.
I'm down for some more Survival Horror goodness.
yup absolutely disgusting price for a game from a studio that is only known for remasters and ports.The only thing holding me off is the 80 euro price tag. Just too much for a 10-12 hour story game I'll finish once or twice. Unfortunately I'm gonna have to wait for a discount.
I was thinking the same, any gameplay shown so far looked like a Souls-like game running at 0.25 speed, hard to believe it's a masterpiece.I've seen some footage from raw gameplay and 9.5/10 she ain't.
The only thing holding me off is the 80 euro price tag. Just too much for a 10-12 hour story game I'll finish once or twice. Unfortunately I'm gonna have to wait for a discount.
yup absolutely disgusting price for a game from a studio that is only known for remasters and ports.
game has to be 85+ for me to buy it day1. also 10-12h is fucking nothing .thats 2 sessions and im 80 € poorer.
Agreed boys, but, Cronos the new Dawn was also supposed to be short and yet, I'm taking my sweet time with it and I'm 23 hours in with the final area still left...
Also, since it's a horror TPS, there's some replay value in there while I could not even think of replaying something like SH2 Remake (which I also enjoyed very much) due to its bloat and general tone.
I'm really interested in SH f but I don't know if I can go with another survival horror in such a short time after Cronos, I'd have to cleanse my palate first with something more "colorful" and/or "happy" both thematically and esthetically wise.
PS: I really hope it's not a short 12-14 hours affair, as you both said, 80€ is too much of an ask.
I expect good things from this game.
It helps that Cronos and SHf have completely different settings.
I beat cronos in 24h..and i also take my time. Im on ng+ now and actually 1 shot the first actual boss up the elevator.Agreed boys, but, Cronos the new Dawn was also supposed to be short and yet, I'm taking my sweet time with it and I'm 23 hours in with the final area still left...
Also, since it's a horror TPS, there's some replay value in there while I could not even think of replaying something like SH2 Remake (which I also enjoyed very much) due to its bloat and general tone.
I'm really interested in SH f but I don't know if I can go with another survival horror in such a short time after Cronos, I'd have to cleanse my palate first with something more "colorful" and/or "happy" both thematically and esthetically wise.
PS: I really hope it's not a short 12-14 hours affair, as you both said, 80€ is too much of an ask.
The only thing holding me off is the 80 euro price tag. Just too much for a 10-12 hour story game I'll finish once or twice. Unfortunately I'm gonna have to wait for a discount.
10-12h is fucking nothing .thats 2 sessions and im 80 € poorer.
Konami: We heard your feedback. We decided that gamers should get the most content suitable for the price of puchase. Therefore, the next Silent Hill game we develop will be an 80 hour Open World RPG.Agreed boys
lol thats the wrong approach but 12h is fucking garbage for 80€ if it isnt a 90+ game.Konami: We heard your feedback. We decided that gamers should get the most content suitable for the price of puchase. Therefore, the next Silent Hill game we develop will be an 80 hour Open World RPG.
Time for a Silent Hill GaaS.Konami: We heard your feedback. We decided that gamers should get the most content suitable for the price of puchase. Therefore, the next Silent Hill game we develop will be an 80 hour Open World RPG.
Publishers are too simplistic in approach and they just care about the reason why you didn't buy the game. Since gamers stubbornly continue to equate price to hours spent, instead of price to quality, that will be what the big publishers continue to focus on.lol thats the wrong approach but 12h is fucking garbage for 80€ if it isnt a 90+ game.
but everyone has to know that for themselves
lol thats the wrong approach but 12h is fucking garbage for 80€ if it isnt a 90+ game.
but everyone has to know that for themselves
Absolutely agree but are we getting that with silent hill f? We dont know yetQuality >>> quantity.
I don't mind paying full price for a 10 hour game that I'll remember forever and replay occasionally. If anything, I prefer games that don't waste my time with tedious filler or copy-paste work.
So if SHf is everything I hope for, then that'd be 80 EUR very well spent.
Try not to gauge the experience by the number of hours. The quality will be remembered long after the price and the runtime is forgotten.lol thats the wrong approach but 12h is fucking garbage for 80€ if it isnt a 90+ game.
but everyone has to know that for themselves
Konami: We heard your feedback. We decided that gamers should get the most content suitable for the price of puchase. Therefore, the next Silent Hill game we develop will be an 80 hour Open World RPG.
The "leak" pretty much lines up with what I saw from the early access plays. Game looks dope. Also, every new game has a legion of angry nerds posting "combat sucks", all of that noise can be ignored.I'm putting on my tinfoil hat right the fuck now but...sounds awfully convenient that the early "leak" is a hype-ass 9.5/10.
![]()
PS: Also I'm fucking IN.
You say the quality but the quality of the game is still unknown.Try not to gauge the experience by the number of hours. The quality will be remembered long after the price and the runtime is forgotten.
If you say that number of hours directly correlates to value then by your own logic developers could just make longer games and provide much more value, increasing their sales considerably.
That is exactly what has happened in the industry for decades.
We are trying to dial that back now because we realize it was a mistake. Right?
Yea no I'm not saying it doesn't. I've been hard for this game for months. Just saying the "leak" part sounds more like viral marketing to me not that the score or opinions themselves are bogus. Should've clarified.The "leak" pretty much lines up with what I saw from the early access plays. Game looks dope. Also, every new game has a legion of angry nerds posting "combat sucks", all of that noise can be ignored.