Star Wars: Force for Change - A Message from J.J. Abrams

Status
Not open for further replies.
Already looks better then the prequels. A whole universe being obviously green screen was just too distracting.

Give me puppets and practical effects galore, look at Farscape for instance, Rygel is blatantly a puppet but it doesn't matter you enjoy the character so much because he is 'there'.
 
ignegtMwiBIMF.gif


So much better than CGI. There is hope.

YES! 1000 x YES!
 
That puppet / makeup looks absolutely fantastic!

I'm not against the use of CGI because it will be necessary for something, but I prefer that puppets and practical effects are used whenever possible and if necessary use CG to enhance the practical effect or if it isn't... practical to use them. Seeing puppets makes me very excited and eager to see more. I do not want crap where it is nothing but CG used for everything for the environments, set, people, props, etc.
 
I wonder how layering CGI on top of puppets might look? Like helping with bits of facial animation perhaps . . .
 
I'm digging the alien and setting. Even from this short video you can get the feel of the set decoration and the extras just walking about. Definitely looks like a market. It reminds me of Ep. 2 when Anakin and Padme return to Tatooine.
 
Here's hoping UNICEF gets more out of this marketing campaign than the franchise does.
Don't mind the universe being stripped before its reworked into another mass-appeal hollywood product, its for charity: A Force for Change!

Good on the humanitarian front, time will tell how the movies turn out.
 
Blend of practical and cg FTW...Both have their places.

Yep. I think the White Walkers in GoT look better than any of the all CG aliens in the prequels, and they use a pretty awesome mix of physical and CG (I think apart from the eyes and condensation effects it's almost all 'real').
 
so this is real?
ignegtMwiBIMF.gif



first thing I said was: look at that cgi puppet.. -_-

Is it weird that I really love the way puppets move? They aren't as fluid as CGI but it makes them feel more special. If that was CGI he'd probably have a super overly animated neck and lose its charm.
 
My thoughts on that video:

Looks great. I loved the puppet. He's looks a little fake, but I hope they combine practical with CGI. But what sold me on the puppet is the the thing he was carrying. Overall, I don't think CGI is bad, I think that it should be used in combination with practical.
 
Is it weird that I really love the way puppets move? They aren't as fluid as CGI but it makes them feel more special. If that was CGI he'd probably have a super overly animated neck and lose its charm.
Takes a helluva good touch to get a CGI character to light right and establish convincing presence, I think they did well with characters like Gollum and Davy Jones... not so great with PT characters. I imagine having a lot more of them and tighter time constraints didn't help.
 
ignegtMwiBIMF.gif


So much better than CGI. There is hope.

Hmm is there a glimpse at a trooper hidden in there?
There is a man with what seems like a shouldered rifle and a rebel like cap walking through the set from left to right. Almost looks like military. Protecting the set? Or just set worker?
 
The first of many puppets I hope?

It's great that CGI is continually advancing but puppet tech is easily as cool to me.

Maybe Episode I Yoda wasn't a great example of what a puppet evolution could be like... but look at the Wild Things from Where The Wild Things Are... I think it added SO much to that film that they didn't go full CGI.

Also: Puppets + CGI enhancements for faces, etc., definitely holds a ton of potential as well, which is how they achieved it in Wild Things.

Which is what I hope they do. I loved Where The Wild Things Are. It was mostly due to how they did the puppets.
 
Takes a helluva good touch to get a CGI character to light right and establish convincing presence, I think they did well with characters like Gollum and Davy Jones... not so great with PT characters. I imagine having a lot more of them and tighter time constraints didn't help.

Technology like Ambient Occlusion, HDRI probes, floating point rendering, and global illumination either barely existed or was yet to be invented.
 
Technology like Ambient Occlusion, HDRI probes, floating point rendering, and global illumination either barely existed or was yet to be invented.
This is true. Still helps to have a lot of time to tweak a single character until it looks right, as opposed to a menagerie.
 
Still not opening up to the hype btw...

I still remember the press release/interviews by Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy during the Indy 4 production. They reached out the the "fans" and promised to use oldschool vfx and then the movie opened with a CG meerkat, continued with CG fridges, CG alien ships CG chase scenes and culminated with CG monkey vine swinging.
Didn't even get the filmstock look right. Everything had a weird glow on it like Kaminsky just said FUCK IT.
 
I watched Phantom Menace last night to celebrate the 15 years milestone for myself. The battle droids are almost always perfectly composited into the sequences. It has been easier to do steel and plastic than flesh and blood since the mid 90s.
 
I watched Phantom Menace last night to celebrate the 15 years milestone for myself. The battle droids are almost always perfectly composited into the sequences. It has been easier to do steel and plastic than flesh and blood since the mid 90s.

It's also easier when you still have like a 80% physical set where you can place your silver ball in, take a HDR sphere image and then use the accurate on set lighting to light your CG creatures.
On Ep2 and Ep3 that opportunity got less and less.
 
Still not opening up to the hype btw...

I still remember the press release/interviews by Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy during the Indy 4 production. They reached out the the "fans" and promised to use oldschool vfx and then the movie opened with a CG meerkat, continued with CG fridges, CG alien ships CG chase scenes and culminated with CG monkey vine swinging.
Didn't even get the filmstock look right. Everything had a weird glow on it like Kaminsky just said FUCK IT.

Bitter, but I can't blame you.

Nevertheless, I will eat 3 pairs of my shoes if Ep 7 ends up worse than the prequels. I don't see it happening.
 
Still not opening up to the hype btw...

I still remember the press release/interviews by Spielberg and Kathleen Kennedy during the Indy 4 production. They reached out the the "fans" and promised to use oldschool vfx and then the movie opened with a CG meerkat, continued with CG fridges, CG alien ships CG chase scenes and culminated with CG monkey vine swinging.
Didn't even get the filmstock look right. Everything had a weird glow on it like Kaminsky just said FUCK IT.

Are you a technophobe?
 
Are you a technophobe?

To the contrary. My job is in CG.

But if you promise to go oldschool in a message directly to the audience of the original trilogy and then the very first frame of the movie is a CG animal...
The whole movie just had the same fake sheen and shine as ROTS. Just too much compositing and trying to get away with tinkering.
For a movie that tries to be a successor to RAIDERS that is a sacrileg imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom