ViewtifulJC
Banned
This ISIS thing.
Dear Lord NO!
why in the FUCK did I search twitter for that shit...
This ISIS thing.
Dear Lord NO!
😅 sorryRap topic in OT. Not even gonna do that to myself.
Is shorts and a crop top sexualization though? Hate having these discussions with gaming side because everything boils down to really silly dichotomies with them
Esco do get offend when someone call you Nigerian? This question came from the video infinite linked.
Looked at twitter a bit but stopped after like 2 seconds realizing that I did not want to witness any of that.
Why are all the outlets reporting that Isis claims to have killed Foley with the video making its rounds?
The way it's presented in the game, I'd say yes but VERY mild and inoffensive. Not worthy of complaints because nearly all the characters are wearing wacky stuff for "battle." This isn't like those games where every male avatar is in head-to-toe gear while the one girl has an enormous, exposed chest and bikini non-armor.
I don't know, I don't see anything wrong with it personally. Due to the fact that there is precendence for the outfit and one of the best things about Smash has been it's fan service.
It's very rough to see, but I do occasionally look at the horrible things happening in the world. I feel like we (Americans) have extremely sanitized news and should have to face the world's (and our own) atrocities rather than act like they're not happening. I've walked into bodegas and seen the newspapers showing you the cartel violence that's ravaging Mexico. I see a blurb about air strikes or something in Syria, but then see the footage and it's completely different from words on a screen. That's real and it's more important to see it than be squeamish and pretend it's not there. If there were full video of what happened in Ferguson, I'd watch it even if it deeply disturbed me and messed up my entire day/week/month.
Looks like someone agreed with you. Random junior just straight up posted the uncensored pictures in the thread. I feel sick.It's very rough to see, but I do occasionally look at the horrible things happening in the world. I feel like we (Americans) have extremely sanitized news and should have to face the world's (and our own) atrocities rather than act like they're not happening. I've walked into bodegas and seen the newspapers showing you the cartel violence that's ravaging Mexico. I see a blurb about air strikes or something in Syria, but then see the footage and it's completely different from words on a screen. That's real and it's more important to see it than be squeamish and pretend it's not there. If there were full video of what happened in Ferguson, I'd watch it even if it deeply disturbed me and messed up my entire day/week/month.
Looks like someone agreed with you. Random junior just straight up posted the uncensored pictures in the thread. I feel sick.
Looks like someone agreed with you. Random junior just straight up posted the uncensored pictures in the thread. I feel sick.
Bruh got banned for that fgc post
They should be in that thread, but behind links. Dipshit is trying to prove some sort of point though.Looks like someone agreed with you. Random junior just straight up posted the uncensored pictures in the thread. I feel sick.
real talk here
real talk here
Some things I can relate/agree with others I cant.
Fuck that LAPD OP-ED the Washington Times did...
Or the pervasive nature of whitenessAnd anyone defending it in the thread. "Stay on their good side and you won't get hurt."
That's just-world fallacy bullshit.
Or the pervasive nature of whiteness
real shit. I wonder how esco feels about what this cat is saying if he watched the vid
Or the pervasive nature of whiteness
I hope this post doesn't sink into the many unnoticed BCT posts that many of my other posts have gone into, but I kind of need some advice.
All this summer I tried to get a job and failed. I applied to 12 jobs and up to July heard nothing back even when I called them, to which other people say I still didn't really try enough, even when I rode my bike to ask in person. I just got into a new school and selling my PS4 to even try to scrap up rent. But what I wanna know is how do some of you guys deal when your struggling this low? Of course I did choose the wrong major if I wanted to make money (art) but it shouldn't be this bad to get work or even sell paintings which is something I couldn't manage to do this summer.
For me personally when I went through:
Applied for every job on pretty much every job site ever
became a recluse: no going out, no gaming, no shopping
Was able to get my diet to about 35 bucks a week.
lot of leftovers lot of ramen noodles
Key advice. When you stuggling to get a job hit up temp agencies let them do the work for you. I got a job at Wachovia processing checks for min wage did that from 7pm - 3am. AND IF THEY OFFERING ASK FOR OT. With enough hours min wage can look like 6 figures.
which one's? I'm curious. Not trying to start a argument.
you can live like six figures as well because you have no time to spend your money. Best time I ever had was working two jobs at once because I had no TIME to spend my shit
neogaf aint ready for that discussion. every discussion on white privilege turns into some garbage.
Why does every minority who identifies as a Republican have the shit eating-est grin?
Why does every minority who identifies as a Republican have the shit eating-est grin?
Super villains have to play up the part.
Hair bit I don't agree with. I see it as more as black people just afraid to express them. I am going by personal experience obviously. In high school - college I had all different types of hair styles. Braids, afro, waves, locks ,curls and even had a tail at point.
Men can't cry.
Women bit kinda of bothered me. I just can't see it as women problems. I am on the side of it should be looked as human rights.
Religion bits didn't pay attention to. I just don't care.
And anyone defending it in the thread. "Stay on their good side and you won't get hurt."
That's just-world fallacy bullshit.
After a series of lengthy negotiations, the City of Los Angeles and the U.S. Department of Justice agreed to enter into a consent decree on November 3, 2000, which allows for federal oversight of the L.A.P.D. reform process for a period of five years. In exchange, the Justice Department, which had been investigating the L.A.P.D. since 1996 for excessive force violations, agreed not to pursue a threatened lawsuit against the city.
In a May 8, 2000 letter to James Hahn, the City Attorney for the City of Los Angeles, Bill Lann Lee, the Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Rights Division accused the L.A.P.D. of "engaging in a pattern or practice of excessive force, false arrests, and unreasonable searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution."
The letter noted "serious deficiencies" in the training, supervision, investigations, and discipline of officers, and said the L.A.P.D. failed "to identify and respond to patterns of at-risk officer behavior." Finally, the Justice Department alleged that the civilian Police Commission and Inspector General did not "have the resources needed to conduct meaningful oversight of the L.A.P.D. in a consistent, ongoing manner."
Still, there is evidence that real reform is possible, even if it takes time. The best-documented example of such an effort succeeding is, somewhat remarkably, in Los Angeles, where the beating of King by police helped prompt passage of the federal law in the first place. The city signed its consent decree in 2000 following a particularly shameful stretch that included both the King beating and the Rampart scandal that saw scores of officers affiliated with the department’s anti-gang efforts implicated in a variety of misconduct. Before the decade came to a close, however, there were already signs of significant improvement. An independent study published in 2009 by a trio of researchers at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government found rather stunning results. “Policing in Los Angeles today is noticeably different from what it was only a few years ago,” the authors wrote then. “The quality of service to residents is higher, the perception of the LAPD as fair has risen, and the use of force is down.”
The numbers behind that conclusion tell an even stronger story, most notably this one: 83 percent of residents said that the police department was doing a good or excellent job. That, again, was less than two decades after residents watched in horror as news stations broadcast a home video of a group of LAPD officers beating an unarmed King nearly to death.
Still, the LAPD reforms did not happen overnight and the reform of the Ferguson Police Department, if it ever happens, would likewise take years. And even if that were to happen there is no guarantee that any changes that are enacted will become permanent. “Once the monitor goes away, will these reforms have been institutionalized? Can [police departments] sustain these reforms?” says Walker of the problems facing any reformed department, not just a hypothetical Ferguson. “We need to make sure that these things last.”
Is that bannable?
Not only that, but it's coming from "an officer of the Los Angeles Police Department for seventeen years." Say, what happened during that seventeen years he has been on the force?
Oh, right:
"Fuck off" about sums it up.
And just in the interest of fairness:
So, congratulations, LAPD. You've improved, thanks to your much needed intervention. But Officer Dutta can still fuck off.
Slaughterhouse fanboy popped up again
had to say something after that bullshit, probably gonna close out my FB account soon.