Christ almighty dude, pump the brakes.Like really, we're just fine with Disney/LF dry fucking your childhood heroes
Christ almighty dude, pump the brakes.
No, I don't see it that way. They are fun movies with some drama, action, comedy, lightsabers and space dogfights. There are also some more mature themes mixed in there too, like oppression, rebellion, revenge and political ideologies. It's fine. They aren't 10/10 across the board and they probably aren't going win any awards, but it's not "fucking your childhood heroes". What a ridiculous thing to say.
People always shit on the recent trilogy but it's just history repeating. The same happened with the prequel trilogy back in the day but that now regarded highly (especially by those who grew up with it being 'their' Star Wars. The same will happen with the Rise of Skywalker trilogy.
I'm fairly easy going and actually enjoyed most of the new trilogy despite it's flaws, just as I enjoyed the prequel trilogy at the time. I'm sure I'll enjoy the new stuff, especially if they carry on with how they've done Mando.
How old are you because I'm 50 and fuck Star Wars.It was a different time when I was a young, most adults who found they didn't like a children's show went and did something else instead of trying to force their cemented ways onto the next generation. Those that enjoyed it, enjoyed it for what it was with the kids.
The big differences between the PT and the ST are two things:
1. The PT had a cohesive story and vision. The ST didn't know what it was trying to be and constantly changed course with every film.
2. The PT did an exceptional job world building. The ST did not.
The PT aren't good movies, but they built a foundation that allowed other creators to build off the universe George created. Because of the PT we got good Star Wars stories and material. The Sequels barely created anything new. They just repeated the OT but with less interesting characters. Just because people hated the PT in the past and have warmed up to them a bit now, doesn't mean history will repeat with the ST. If anything the ST shone more of a light on the things the PT did right.
I don't disagree. My 15 year old son, who I introduced to SW as a birth right, fucking hates the new trilogy. So I don't know exactly who they were catering for lol. Most complaints are reasonable, but no doubt people younger than him will grow up with fond memories nonetheless.
Yep, I can't argue with any of that. We can only hope they learned from their mistakes, though it's sad that they can't be undone. Mandalorian, for me, is the best SW content for years, so it gives me hope. But Disney will always be Disney...My whole deal is that if the Sequel Trilogy just plain sucked, then no big deal I'll just move on and forget. It's the fact that it tarnished the OT that made me so upset. I'm just gonna drop a quote from Reddit that was posted after the Rey movie was announced, because it sums up a lot of people's feelings much better than I can:
"They also set the precedent that decades of story building, character building, and world building can be undone whenever they want to make more money. The sequel trilogy informed us that our original heroes from the first six movies DID NOT actually defeat the empire and it felt like such a kick in the face. We grew up with six movies of varying quality, but with a unified message and goal: defeat the Sith, defeat the Empire, restore hope.
We quickly find out that instead:
They undid the accomplishments of the PT/OT heroes so that they could reuse the core story structure but with a new cast."
- Luke did not succeed in returning the Jedi, nor did he spend his life as a beacon of hope for the galaxy.
- Leia did not succeed in building a principled government to replace the fascist empire.
- Han did not successfully put his smuggling past behind him enough to become a leader or a father.
- Anakin/Vader did not actually destroy Palpatine.
It was a different time when I was a young, most adults who found they didn't like a children's show went and did something else instead of trying to force their cemented ways onto the next generation. Those that enjoyed it, enjoyed it for what it was with the kids.
Remember when they managed to get the crew from The Raid: Redemption and managed to put them in an entirely forgetful scene with Han Solo and waste their time?This is kinda what Disney did with Eternals and it sucked. Get the John Wick director already!!! Could you imagine a lightsaber fight choreographed by that team!!
The sequel trilogy informed us that our original heroes from the first six movies DID NOT
We quickly find out that instead:[/I]
They undid the accomplishments of the PT/OT heroes so that they could reuse the core story structure but with a new cast."
- Luke did not succeed in returning the Jedi, nor did he spend his life as a beacon of hope for the galaxy.
- Leia did not succeed in building a principled government to replace the fascist empire.
- Han did not successfully put his smuggling past behind him enough to become a leader or a father.
- Anakin/Vader did not actually destroy Palpatine.
There is anotherWait for Thanos to show up and rewind time to May 25, 1983.
Save us, Thanos. You're our only hope.
The damage the sequel trilogy has done to the original characters cannot be understated. It broke up Han an Leia, turned their son on to a patricidal/genocidal maniac, turned Luke into an abusive uncle and complete failure, undid Anikin's final act of salvation, and finally killed the entire OG cast off, one by one.My whole deal is that if the Sequel Trilogy just plain sucked, then no big deal I'll just move on and forget. It's the fact that it tarnished the OT that made me so upset. I'm just gonna drop a quote from Reddit that was posted after the Rey movie was announced, because it sums up a lot of people's feelings much better than I can:
"They also set the precedent that decades of story building, character building, and world building can be undone whenever they want to make more money. The sequel trilogy informed us that our original heroes from the first six movies DID NOT actually defeat the empire and it felt like such a kick in the face. We grew up with six movies of varying quality, but with a unified message and goal: defeat the Sith, defeat the Empire, restore hope.
We quickly find out that instead:
They undid the accomplishments of the PT/OT heroes so that they could reuse the core story structure but with a new cast."
- Luke did not succeed in returning the Jedi, nor did he spend his life as a beacon of hope for the galaxy.
- Leia did not succeed in building a principled government to replace the fascist empire.
- Han did not successfully put his smuggling past behind him enough to become a leader or a father.
- Anakin/Vader did not actually destroy Palpatine.
It's honestly shocking to me that so many Star Wars fans are just okay with the fact that the current regime completely tarnished the legacy of the OT characters
I'm ok with this. Rey was mostly ruined by the numbskull writing and piss poor decisions they made for IX. This can easily redeem her.
I thought he was arrested.There is another
Except they are highly regarded by many of the youngsters who grew up with it, despite how you feel about them. You're right in that they weren't great movies and for sure, there were some failings on Lucas' part, but they did what they were supposed to in expanding the story and the universe and most importantly, getting a younger generation on board. Do you think they'd be making SW films if it was only us old bastards watching it, with our numbers dwindling every year?The prequel trilogy was never good and it hasn't aged any better. Stop saying the films are now highly regarded - they are not. Nearly everyone acknowledges they aren't good films - RotS is the only contentious one and it's average at best.
The prequels did spawn good subsequent content to the Star Wars universe, so most people are now less harsh on the films themselves. However, the only universally regarded aspect of the films is their music. It is S tier.
The prequel trilogy was never good and it hasn't aged any better. Stop saying the films are now highly regarded - they are not. Nearly everyone acknowledges they aren't good films - RotS is the only contentious one and it's average at best.
The prequels did spawn good subsequent content to the Star Wars universe, so most people are now less harsh on the films themselves. However, the only universally regarded aspect of the films is their music. It is S tier.
Bar the script, they are pretty good films though.
The sequels have a mediocre script and some great CGI going for them. That's all.
Neither have great writing (not script), but at least the prequels' is coherent and tries to add to the universe and story, not rehash it almost scene for scene.
We got the big clone - droid battle, and frankly that alone does enough to redeem it for most people.Revenge of the Sith looks like Citizen Kane when you compare it with Ep9.
Ps. Attack of the clones is equally bad as episode 8/9 BUT at least it moves the story in the same direction to Episode 3.
When the first prequel came out it confirmed for me, after watching RotJ following ESB on the original opening day in my town in the 80s, the storytelling wasn't going to mature with me.How old are you because I'm 50 and fuck Star Wars.
I watched the prequels didn't care for them and pretty much forgot about Star Wars until The Force Awakens. I watched it realized it was a rehash of A New Hope and said fuck this I'm out. Didn't bother watching the other 2 sequels.When the first prequel came out it confirmed for me, after watching RotJ following ESB on the original opening day in my town in the 80s, the storytelling wasn't going to mature with me.
After letting go of any expectations of being the target audience I enjoy watching the shows for insight into how it's intricacies are changed for those it's intended. Midichlorians? Wizard.
None of Marvel/Star Wars movies of the past 20 years were actually great
Decent at most, while many of the better ones were passable at best but you gave em BILLIONS.
Latest movie with Ray as a lead got BILLION in the box office and it is the worst piece of shit ever put to screen.
You kept paying them for decades to make crap n now surprised that it is all they can produce...
There is no suprise though.
Ya she’s really pretty but not Megan Fox type hot. I do think it’s somewhat on purpose. Fits in with most SW characters. I always thought Hayden was too good looking to be Anakin. Luke was never the most attractive man or greatest actor but I feel he was perfect looking back.Ok. I have a silly opinion about something. Tell me if I'm crazy or I'm into something here.
When I saw the trailer for the sequel, my first thought was that they chose an actress unbelievably pretty.
My second though was that... she was beautiful but also... kind of not attractive.
And... was that by design? Did Disney casting personnel set out to find the most "innocuous", least tantalizing actress possible?
Yeah. That was my point.Not entirely, especially from a Marvel POV. I rank the Captain America trilogy ((in isolation) as one of the best trilogies made over the past 20, maybe even 30 years. Infinity War and Endgame were also spectacular, a cinematic moment we were lucky to see unfold as it happened. Without the movies leading up to that moment, they wouldn't have been as impactful. Admittedly not every Marvel film was great, some were pretty poor actually. But the bigger picture, they nailed it. Post Endgame though, yeah, a massive drop off (I won't get into reasons here). But before that, I strongly disagree with you saying Marvel movies were passable. Most were excellent at being both world building for the bigger picture and standalone popcorn flicks.
Yeah but with enough work your cock can stand on it's own, the ST not so much.Disney star wars is limp. Like my cock.
No matter how hard I try, it just flops. Star wars might just stand a chance yet. Just needs proper motivation.Yeah but with enough work your cock can stand on it's own, the ST not so much.