SporeCrawler
Member
As Juncker put it last year, when there were talks about Greece leaving the Euro: "there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties"
Historically, what happens in the EU is the result of the referendum is either ignored or people are asked to vote until they vote EU
Country | Year | Reason | % of "NO" | Outcome
Denmark | 1992 | Maastricht treaty | 51,7% | Had to revote
Denmark | 2000 | uro Membership | 53,2% | Accepted
Ireland | 2001 | Nice Treaty | 53,9% | Had to revote
Sweden | 2003 | uro membership | 56,1% | Accepted
France | 2005 | European Constitution (TCE) | 54,9% | Ignored
Netherlands | 2005 | European Constitution (TCE) | 61,5% | Ignored
Ireland | 2008 | Lisbon Treaty | 53,2% | Had to revote
Greece| 2015 | Creditors conditions | 61,3% | Ignored
If you look at the stance of european leaders you will see that there is an undercurrent that actually welcomes the outcome. UK was one lf the major roadblockers that prevented any meaningful evolution into a closer more democratic union.
Take a look at the most recent example : The EU had a parliament election and the biggest parties promised that the respective winner will choose the commission president (the commision being the EU institution with the least democratic legitimization) and UK tried to blocl it because they didnt like the winner.