Was going to make a joke, but it doesn't go up to Article 66.it's article 50 mate
Was going to make a joke, but it doesn't go up to Article 66.it's article 50 mate
Murdoch updated the software5 times Michael Gove has said he's not capable of leading:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...al-not-equipped-to-be-pm-candidate?CMP=twt_gu
But in the case that solves the domestic problem, the damage to the EU/UK relationship is irrecoverable. No one will trust UK anymore.
Murdoch updated the software
If EU refuses to negotiate before UK has exited and UK has to go WTO terms, it's check mate for UK.
"First you exit then you negotiate," Cecilia Malmstrom told BBC Newsnight.
After Brexit, the UK would become a "third country" in EU terms, she said - meaning trade would be carried out based on World Trade Organisation rules until a new deal was complete.
A recent trade deal with Canada took seven years to negotiate.
The Canadian agreement will also require ratification by all EU countries, adding another one to two years before it takes effect.
Ms Malmstrom, the EU Trade Commissioner, underlined that detailed talks to shape the UK's new trading relationship with the EU should not start until after the process of leaving politically, under an Article 50 process lasting up to two years.
"There are actually two negotiations. First you exit, and then you negotiate the new relationship, whatever that is," she said.
https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCNews/status/748590418095448064?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
When you think the situation surely couldn't be any worse.
Does anyone have an explanation as to why the House of Commons did not insist on the result of the referendum to become binding? Because as it is now, parliament has to vote on the referendum.
Because they never are, they're advisory by nature.
That's the silver lining, so far.Well yes. But bear in mind there's no actual evidence that May said anything of the sort at all.
That's not what she is reported as saying either.
Look, the rights of EU nationals in the UK need to be secured, as absent the EU treaties there is no such right. This something to be bargained for. I see nothing wrong with that, nor in potentially using this as a bargaining chip to secure identical rights for brits resident in the EU.
Because they never are, they're advisory by nature.
You're absolutely right.I think france just shot itself in the foot. That doesn't meet British humor standards, not even close.
45
Complete Forensics
Complete Forensics‏ @Com_Forensics
@BBCNews you mean EU can't begin trade talks until the UK is FREE... Stop the spin
Er, I don't think the BBC are the spinners here... Unless he means free of an economy, then sure!
Under EU law, the bloc cannot negotiate a separate trade deal with one of its own members, hence the commissioner's insistence that the UK must first leave.
It is also against EU law for a member to negotiate its own trade deals with outsiders, which means the UK cannot start doing this until after it has left the EU.
Taken at face value, these rules mean the UK cannot conduct its own trade talks for up to two years - a fearsome challenge to any prime minister trying to deliver Brexit.
But the AV referendum was binding? Although that might have been because too many MPs would have had an interest in keeping FPTP.
Murdoch updated the software
My Polish wife, (who works for the Ministry of Justice no less), was subject to that casual racism of: 'The country is too full, so we shouldn't be let anyone in. Not you (my wife), of course, but all the others'
Some of these are white, some if these are second generation immigrants from all over the world. Either way, you have had all of the benefits and opportunities provided for you and now you don't want to share it with others.
Well l'm sorry if l sound small-minded, but if you don't like it and you voted out, irrespective of race, colour, Creed or religion, you can GTFO out of my country, because that is not what l stand for, or my country stands for.
When the political becomes personal, that's when it's raw.
Last Friday was my wife and mines 10th wedding anniversary. She spent the day in bed. I've never seen her so sad. Desperation. Desolation. That's all we could feel.
If you think that is acceptable or the sign of a liberal democracy you are deluded.
I'm sorry to vent like this, but that's the way l feel. I don't recognise what is going on here anymore.
Behold the power of the technocrats!
Does anyone have an explanation as to why the House of Commons did not insist on the result of the referendum to become binding? Because as it is now, parliament has to vote on the referendum.
So, like, theoretically what if the UK just went and started negotiating trade agreements on its own while article 50 was in abeyance or in progress? What would the consequences be, exactly? Would the EU sanction the other party?
I'm unclear on the EU's enforcement power on a country that is planning to leave.
So, like, theoretically what if the UK just went and started negotiating trade agreements on its own while article 50 was in abeyance or in progress? What would the consequences be, exactly? Would the EU sanction the other party?
I'm unclear on the EU's enforcement power on a country that is planning to leave.
BBC reporting it now:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36678222
Unfortunately it makes sense from a negotiating standpoint. How could they negotiate a trade deal until they've figured out what the basic arrangements of the separation are?
Also, explains why the people in Europe have been so keen for us to get Article 50 activatedimmediatelyas soon as possible.
They aren't saying Britain cant negotiate deals outside the EU. Just that there won't be any discussion on deals with the EU until article 50 is over.
However, there is a very practical reason we can't - we don't have anyone to do it. We haven't negotiated trade deals in 40 years, we don't have the skills or people. It takes hundreds of specialists to make these deals, and we have none. Add into that the fact the civil service is in melt down and has to deal with Brexit issues (which is probably the biggest legal challenge in human history, no joke), and it's unbelievably unlikely we'd have anything done or even started in time.
They never considered we'd be dumb enough to actually vote leave.
Why is this just coming to light now? Why didn't this come out in the last week or, better yet, before the referendum?
This would be a disaster.
I was just looking at the transcript from Boris the Spider's speech on his Facebook page today and I couldn't help myself but look at the comments section. My god, so many people are so far up his arse it's quite unbelievable. Literally he can do no wrong in some peoples' eyes. Astonishing.
They aren't saying Britain cant negotiate deals outside the EU. Just that there won't be any discussion on deals with the EU until article 50 is over.
However, there is a very practical reason we can't - we don't have anyone to do it. We haven't negotiated trade deals in 40 years, we don't have the skills or people. It takes hundreds of specialists to make these deals, and we have none. Add into that the fact the civil service is in melt down and has to deal with Brexit issues (which is probably the biggest legal challenge in human history, no joke), and it's unbelievably unlikely we'd have anything done or even started in time.
I was trying to feel a little optimistic about getting an EEA-esque deal a few days ago... At this point Brexit looks totally untenable tbh, the deal we end up with will be unacceptable to the public and it could take forever for us to get there...
Why is this just coming to light now? Why didn't this come out in the last week or, better yet, before the referendum?
This would be a disaster.
Malmstrom's tone comes across as very sarcastic:
"This would be catastrophic."
"Yes it would - we're respecting the will of the British people."
This puts an absolute best case scenario as negotiating a new deal in half a decade, at least three years of which would be with us not receiving any extraordinary trade benefits from anyone, with no guarantee that the resulting deal would be any good (and considering our economy would be on fire the entire time and we'd be desperate to get a deal done as soon as possible, it's not like we have much leverage).
Just... fucking... wow.
Remember, there was no exit planning done by either the UK government or the Leave campaign. There may well have been an article or two published during the campaign by those in the know, but they obviously would have been too dull to focus on when we were busy shouting 'racist' and 'traitor' at one another.
Behold the power of the technocrats!
My god Gove is going to be Prime Minister isn't he
We've hit dystopia
https://mobile.twitter.com/BBCNews/status/748590418095448064?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
When you think the situation surely couldn't be any worse.
So if a country had a legitimate reason to leave that everyone agreed with, how would they even do it? Ironically it seems one of the few more agreeable arguments against the EU (could be considered a bureaucratic mess) actually just makes it impossible to leave safely.
This puts an absolute best case scenario as negotiating a new deal in half a decade, at least three years of which would be with us not receiving any extraordinary trade benefits from anyone, with no guarantee that the resulting deal would be any good (and considering our economy would be on fire the entire time and we'd be desperate to get a deal done as soon as possible, it's not like we have much leverage).
Just... fucking... wow.
So if a country had a legitimate reason to leave that everyone agreed with, how would they even do it? Ironically it seems one of the few more agreeable arguments against the EU (could be considered a bureaucratic mess) actually just makes it impossible to leave safely.
Well leaving itself is quite straightforward, "I'm out, cancel all the treaties that bind us". The issue is when the member that leaves still wants to keep some of its benefits, which partially contradicts the concept of leaving.
I followed most things pretty closely across multiple sites (and I like the dull things). Considering this seems to have come as a surprise to some countries in the EU since France was making noise about negotiations during the period, I think everyone has just found out today.