Mate I love it. Better than 3 IMO #shitbrexiterssay
And if this doesn't show that Leave voters are mis-informed, what will?!
;D
Mate I love it. Better than 3 IMO #shitbrexiterssay
The referendum is not binding -- they're still in EU until they invoke article 50. Article 50 is the formal process of leaving EU and can take up to 2 years.Can someone please ELI5 everything about article 50? What is it? Why should Britain invoke/not invoke it?
1) Paid access to single marketSame, I am looking to leave England and move back to Scotland.
What's the Norway Model?
I mean give that you might think that the UK voting to leave the EU is already a ridiculous outcome to this whole situation, in context it becomes a lot less ridiculous.
Mate I love it. Better than 3 IMO #shitbrexiterssay
DS2 is the best of all of them.
Gemüsepizza;208303903 said:Why should we be salty? You are the ones who have destroyed your country: The United Kingdom will cease to exist. Scotland and Northern Ireland will leave the UK. Countless businesses will disappear or relocate. The whole financial sector will move to other EU countries. Your economy was massively weakened. Funding for universities and research will stop. Young, talented people will not be coming to your country anymore in the future, and your own young people will leave. Many progressive laws securing rights for workers and minorities will disappear. What's left is a small country called England (and Wales) with a capital that has completely lost it's importance, a country with a population which consists to a significant extent of racist and old people, uneducated and poor people. I'm not salty. But maybe you should be salty.
The whole point is that the EU is not the entirety of the world, the UK can start doing deals with other countries, you know the ones that are growing rapidly.
I can't believe my family. They pretty much all voted to leave, and when asked why immigration is the answer I get. I wouldn't even be here if it wasn't for immigration as my dad's side of the family is from (what was then called) Burma. I have never met him or his family, so no idea what they voted, but my whiter than white side of the family must forget, or simply don't care about my heritage.
This whole thing wouldn't be as scary to me, if not for the fact I have an eight month old son. I feel like the choice made yesterday will impact his life much more than the majority that chose leave yesterday.
All you have to do is look at the top ten movie/music charts to know that putting such a big decision in the hands of the masses was a mistake.
Originally Posted by Arksy
The whole point is that the EU is not the entirety of the world, the UK can start doing deals with other countries, you know the ones that are growing rapidly.
How many times does it have to be said: we haven't left yet.The world will go back to work on Monday, there will be a week of anger then slowly life will return to normal
Where is all this coming from? The UK's economy will diminish and suffer no doubt and Scotland will leave (something that would've happened eventually anyway) but the country will not become Somalia overnight.
Have people lost all rational thinking or something?
Not sure if it has been posted yet, but VoteLeaveDerbyshire as had a right go at prominent leave campaigner Dan Hannan's comments over free movement of people last night:
VoteleaveDerbyshire: I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAID MR HANNAN. WE JUST VOTED TO STOP MASS IMMIGRATION. NOW DELIVER FOR US.
https://twitter.com/DerbyshireLeave/status/746496329925419009
It's started all ready.
For those who missed Dan's comment, he basically said that the free movement of people would be inevetibale post bre-exit.
The referendum is not binding -- they're still in EU until they invoke article 50. Article 50 is the formal process of leaving EU and can take up to 2 years.
Except for the people who got fired, are losing their job in the near future or need to move their families abroad to continue their careers. And for the people missing out on EU subsidies. And the ones being uncertain of being able to continue their work in the UK because they are not a citizen.
But sure, monday is back to normal. Do you really believe that?
The world will go back to work on Monday, there will be a week of anger then slowly life will return to normal
Where is all this coming from? The UK's economy will diminish and suffer no doubt and Scotland will leave (something that would've happened eventually anyway) but the country will not become Somalia overnight.
Have people lost all rational thinking or something?
Not sure if it has been posted yet, but VoteLeaveDerbyshire as had a right go at prominent leave campaigner Dan Hannan's comments over free movement of people last night:
VoteleaveDerbyshire: I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU SAID MR HANNAN. WE JUST VOTED TO STOP MASS IMMIGRATION. NOW DELIVER FOR US.
https://twitter.com/DerbyshireLeave/status/746496329925419009
It's started all ready.
For those who missed Dan's comment, he basically said that the free movement of people would be inevetibale post bre-exit.
The world will go back to work on Monday, there will be a week of anger then slowly life will return to normal
I was kind of thinking the news etc, the huge outrage at the moment will subsided as news moves on
obviously I was not clear
Jeremy Corbyn walks off from LGBT Labour #Pride2016 event after shouts of "resign" and "this is your fault"
To all the posters loving the UK punishment, the pain will be for all. Just wait until France has to pay 30-40 % more to EU, the protests and blockades, all those new members joining with cap in hand.
Its a mess for everyone, and anyone thinks otherwise is living in lala land.
Feel bad for anyone who might have been on vacation...
Can someone please ELI5 everything about article 50? What is it? Why should Britain invoke/not invoke it?
I mean, the most likely answer is probably "it's only been a day" -- big moves like this take some time to get rolling.Oh I see, thanks.
So why are they not invoking it? What do people want now? Do they still want to leave EU or are they scared to do so?
Or Cameron wants no responsibility?
Oh I see, thanks.
So why are they not invoking it? What do people want now? Do they still want to leave EU or are they scared to do so?
Or Cameron wants no responsibility?
People keep saying that a 'worse' deal would be punitive, but there's more to it than that. Countries like Norway or Switzerland have their current agreements with the EU because those were the mutually agreeable terms for trade. Even with the UK's importance for the European market, Britain leaving the union is a sour deal for the other member states for various political reasons, but also because it negatively affects citizens of the various member states. The UK shouldn't expect to get anything it might want without having to make some concessions. With that in mind, matters are not nearly as simple as some would have them.
Don't forget that, even though Germany and France have significant political sway (especially in the European Parliament, since they have large numbers of MEPs), negotiations are made by the European Council, in which each member state has equal representation (and in which even small countries have been able to hold up progress with regards to things like the refugee crisis).
It's not so much about putting the UK in its place as it is about protecting the interests of the EU and its remaining members, which may not necessarily align with the British ones, and which may trump national economic concerns.
We haven't actually left yet.
I'll say this as straight forwardly as I can as its been said umpteen times in this thread, there's no punishment or if there is its a side effect of the eu primary concern which is to make the eventual deal with the U.K. so puntative that no other member state would think you know what I'll leave and get me some sweet deal like the uk got
There's no emotion or retribution out of pique behind it its simple politics. The eu needs to make the prospect of leaving so unpalatable that there's no incentive for any other member state to do so. There's a cost to the benefits of membership any exit needs to be made higher than those costs and offer far less benefits. The U.K. Is ultimately going to get a far worse deal to keep a trade relationship open than it currently has as a member. There would be no point to Eu membership if that wasn't the case.
And while the in value terms the Eu exports more to the uk than the uk exports to the Eu. U.K. Exports to the eu make up about 44% of the uks total exports, the European exports to the uk make up about 12% of the eu total exports (about 3% of rEU gdp) and that's shared between 27 countries , put simply they can do without our market far easier than we can do without access theirs.
In your eyes, what would be a good and realistic deal that the UK can achieve?they wont invoke (despite the toy throwing from the EU) until they are good and ready, Cameron can not be trusted to secure a good deal, so that is why we need a new PM, so article 50 will need to wait until then...
of course one of Camerons threats was he would invoke article 50 if leave won immediately...
oddly that is another threat that has not come to pass
On Monday, yes, I'll be back at work. When we leave, I'm probably losing my job and career as an Ecologist.
Per CIEEM: The immediate focus will be on protecting the economy, however it is vital that we do not let protection of the environment slip under the radar. Not only would that be detrimental to nature conservation, it would also impact those sectors intertwined with environmental legislation such as construction, engineering, farming, water and energy.
'We just voted to stop mass immigration.'
That's weird honestly because it wasn't the question on my ballot paper.
Oh I see, thanks.
So why are they not invoking it? What do people want now? Do they still want to leave EU or are they scared to do so?
Or Cameron wants no responsibility?
Well the fact the Tories slogan is a tree, and they are not anti environment, should give you some hope they don't suddenly reject climate change and the environment
Looks like the EU is dying to give you the boot.
In your eyes, what would be a good and realistic deal that the UK can achieve?
Oh I see, thanks.
So why are they not invoking it? What do people want now? Do they still want to leave EU or are they scared to do so?
Or Cameron wants no responsibility?
I know.But it was heavily used as a means to make voters vote for Leave.
Well the fact the Tories slogan is a tree...should give you some hope they don't suddenly reject climate change and the environment
Well the fact the Tories slogan is a tree, and they are not anti environment, should give you some hope they don't suddenly reject climate change and the environment
Looks like the EU is dying to give you the boot.
lmao, well that settles it!
umm, not sure I should post it as the members are still very upset, and the last thing I want it a gang hunt, give it a few days for everyone to calm down a little and I will respond
Someone already answered me but thanks anyway.It is the mechanism with which a country uses to leave the EU. It is part of the Lisbon treaty (if I remember correctly) and was only shoved in there to keep some Euro-sceptics happy. No one expected to ever use it so it is very vague and not all that well thought out.
Basically if the UK wants to leave we go to the EU and officially confirm we are invoking Article 50. This will then give us a time limit of 2 years to negotiate our extraction from the EU. The 2 year dead line can be extended if all the other countries agree. If an extension is not granted then 2 years after invoking Article 50 we cease being a part of the EU.
As it stands right now we are still full members of the EU, we have not yet begun the leaving process. All that has happened so far is the UK public as "advised" our Government that we no longer want to be part of the EU. Yup that is right the referendum is not even legally binding, the UK Government could go "hmm ok cheers for that brah, but no".
I mean, the most likely answer is probably "it's only been a day" -- big moves like this take some time to get rolling.
Thanksthey wont invoke (despite the toy throwing from the EU) until they are good and ready, Cameron can not be trusted to secure a good deal, so that is why we need a new PM, so article 50 will need to wait until then...
of course one of Camerons threats was he would invoke article 50 if leave won immediately...
oddly that is another threat that has not come to pass