EEA requires all the same laws we always implemented plus freedom of movement, so it would be a sad and hilarious outcome.
Even better: You'll also lose your voice in Brussels. I'm sure the Leavers will be pleased.
EEA requires all the same laws we always implemented plus freedom of movement, so it would be a sad and hilarious outcome.
My understanding is it'll be exactly the same as it is now (in terms of money paid in, freedom of movement etc) except we'll actually have no say on EU regulation whereas we currently do and like to pretend we don't.How different is EEA to what we have now because it sounds more like a status in the EU change rather than...practical effects?
Sovereignty is the only thing we get, that'll be enough to appease most leave voters.
Have to pay the same, don't get the same benefits, can't vote the laws to abide to even less so veto them, open borders.How different is EEA to what we have now because it sounds more like a status in the EU change rather than...practical effects?
1) Still the same freedom of movement
2) Still pay EU to access single market
BUT
1) Have to follow all of EU's regulation with no voting/veto rights
2) No funding from EU for city building etc
My understanding is it'll be exactly the same as it is now (in terms of money paid in, freedom of movement etc) except we'll actually have no say on EU laws whereas we currently do and like to pretend we don't.
Except freedom of movement will remain.And in simple terms, that's what a lot of leavers wanted.
And in simple terms, that's what a lot of leavers wanted.
When do we begin? "That is a question for the next leadership"
What about the single market? "That is a question for the next leadership"
Sugar in your tea? " "That is a question for the ne... one please"
1) Still the same freedom of movement (actually slightly looser as there won't be any passport checks at Eurostar, the tunnel, the ferry at Dover...plus travelling to EU via flight using just a driver's license instead of passport would be possible)
2) Still pay EU to access single market
BUT
1) Have to follow all of EU's regulation with no voting/veto rights/no place in EU parliament
2) No funding from EU for city building etc
HAHAHA
"We want access to the single market but no free movement and we don't want to pay for it"
And in simple terms, that's what a lot of leavers wanted.
Except freedom of movement will remain.
So what are the realistic chances that Ireland is unified, Scotland is independent (or form a Gaelic Union with Northern Ireland), and London becomes an independent city-state if the UK actually leaves the EU?
HAHAHA
"We want access to the single market but no free movement and we don't want to pay for it"
HAHAHA
"We want access to the single market but no free movement and we don't want to pay for it"
What's the general message here, then?
What's the general message here, then?
Notice how he didn't address it at all, because he knows it's impossibleWhat prevents banks from moving out of London even if they get a Norway-style deal?
What are the advantages from being based in London?
What's the general message here, then?
What's the general message here, then?
Literally "i dunno"What's the general message here, then?
No they are saying it will take 10years to negotiate a trade deal with China.
This and the 350m p/w for the NHS....
What will the Leave voters think?
Sounds like Cameron wants to drag triggering article 50 until new trade deals are in place, am I getting this right?
Sounds like Cameron wants to drag triggering article 50 until new trade deals are in place, am I getting this right?
We have not got enough trade negotiators for any of this shit.
Yep. He wants no partMore like he doesn't want to deal with it, so it's up to whoever comes next to trigger it.
What's the general message here, then?
This is awful :/
I think it's going to happen guys
This is awful :/
I think it's going to happen guys
It's going to happen.This is awful :/
I think it's going to happen guys