If you can bring Teddy alive to the center of the maze, you win the game.
Bulletproof vest for Teddy as In-Park-Purchase confirmed
If you can bring Teddy alive to the center of the maze, you win the game.
Bulletproof vest for Teddy as In-Park-Purchase confirmed
Just carry some extra blood. Fill him back up.
I think I'm enjoying the show, but now I wonder, I'm the only one who thinks that it's a little too slow paced? I'm ok with a slow developing of sentience, but I don't know, for a hour long episode each I think they could speed it up a little, but probably it's just me
I think I'm enjoying the show, but now I wonder, I'm the only one who thinks that it's a little too slow paced? I'm ok with a slow developing of sentience, but I don't know, for a hour long episode each I think they could speed it up a little, but probably it's just me
I'm expecting a Truman Show-esque escape attempt with Teddy and Dolores at some point this season. I thought it was going to happen after they talked about going to Mexico, but that was obviously just the setup.
Sure, but they've crafted a multi-season story for Westworld, and it'll get renewed sooner or later.
If you can bring Teddy alive to the center of the maze, you win the game.
That's because Hopkins was uncreditedHoly shit, I'm channel surfing and see that Mission Impossible 2 is on, so I watch it because Thandie Newton is in it, and I suddenly hear another familiar voice. I totally forgot that Anthony Hopkins is in this movie too.
The delay could be for a number of reasons like budget or episode count. Westworld doesn't have the same challenges as Game of Thrones so perhaps HBO expect more bang for their buck.
Or it could be good news and they want to wait until the season is over to announce they are renewed for seasons 2 and 3 to try and build some offseason buzz by making a big commitment to the show.
The delay probably boils down to production planning. Westworld ran into a lot if problems because the entire season wasn't written when they started shooting. HBO likely doesn't want that happening again. Once the showrunners have the season all worked out and they can agree on budget and scheduling, they will renew it.
Given their history with shows that prominently feature horses, they might not wanna test their Luck >.>
If you can bring Teddy alive to the center of the maze, you win the game.
Has there been any dialog in the series that explain why the robots/hosts are created being able to suffer?
Or is it just ye olde standard God complex type of religious dogma that tries to justify the cruelty that happens in humanity as if we can't possibly be humans if we do not suffer?
Do you think it's important to the guests if the hosts suffer or not? For realism of the experience? Even if the guests' invincibility undermines the very realism of that experience?
ugh
I do not know what to do with all of these questions in my head about this show...
3)i defiinitely think someone working for the park is not real, and that they are an android.
how crazy would it be to find out that Bernard was actually an android of ford's design, and ford uses different phrases for bernard so that no one accidentally turns him off or something.
I think you might be overthinking it. The hosts are designed to be as human as possible. They can think, they can feel, and they can suffer. It's all for the realism.
you think so? i keep running into concepts that i cant quite reconcile well in my head in westworld
is it all for the realism? there are other aspects in ww that seems to run counter to that very idea to me....
.... am i overthinking things? seems like this thread is full with thinking, but maybe i'm not thinking about things in the right way. i will try to stop thinking about things.
Yes. In the pilot episode Lee Sizemore (the narrative director) even complained about that they are so realistic that he wanted them to roll back the updates and make them more like robots again.
Yes i remember that. But that doesn't really explain why they are made to be able to suffer. Which is, of course (we all know), is one of the biggest questions people would ask a hypothetical god. The parallel isn't lost on anyone. Specially if the answer is for 'humanity'.
I mean, the show seems to be eager to say ww is realistic when it suits them and when there are aspects that aren't very realistic, they are handwaved. I can't reconcile that. In my head.
But yeah... I will try to stop thinking. Trying. Trying.
Has there been any dialog in the series that explain why the robots/hosts are created being able to suffer?
Or is it just ye olde standard God complex type of religious dogma that tries to justify the cruelty that happens in humanity as if we can't possibly be humans if we do not suffer?
Do you think it's important to the guests if the hosts suffer or not? For realism of the experience? Even if the guests' invincibility undermines the very realism of that experience?
ugh
I do not know what to do with all of these questions in my head about this show...
Brain surgeons today could remove part of your brain to reduce your emotions. Does that change anything about your experience?They aren't suffering, they're just displaying the visual appearance of suffering. When ever the management talks to robots they're always telling them to turn down emotional affectation and such. You're falling into the trap that the writers have set up for the audience to think of the robots as people.
Brain surgeons today could remove part of your brain to reduce your emotions. Does that change anything about your experience?
NPCs in video games scream when I shoot them. Are they in pain?
If you can disable the ability to feel and react to pain and experience any ill effects from pain, is it still painful?No but The Hosts are.
If you can disable the ability to feel and react to pain and experience any ill effects from pain, is it still painful?
Yes, but those humans will still suffer physically from those wounds, get an infection, get sick, die. A Host won't. The pain, reaction to pain, and debilitating effects of injuries are all an illusion.There are humans that can't feel pain, that don't even know they should be in pain. Does it make them less human? By what we see here, they still seem to be growing to human like minds.
Why are you guys only talking about physical pain? The hosts are clearly experiencing a lot more than that.If you can disable the ability to feel and react to pain and experience any ill effects from pain, is it still painful?
Yes, but those humans will still suffer physically from those wounds, get an infection, get sick, die. A Host won't. The pain, reaction to pain, and debilitating effects of injuries are all an illusion.
The flesh "covering"? was infected. Doesn't mean the host would suffer any effects. Like how Terminator's skin can age and be damaged, but that won't bother or affect the machine underneathThey don't seem immune to the effects, Maeve did suffer from that infection. It is just that is easier to heal those Hosts, although that is debatable. We don't know the advances of regular medicine. Gunshot wounds in humans might be healable as well.
How do they work anyway. Is it a terminator thing where it's skin over metal or do they have a bunch of fake organs.The flesh "covering"? was infected. Doesn't mean the host would suffer any effects. Like how Terminator's skin can age and be damaged, but that won't bother or affect the machine underneath
There was a featurette posted earlier in the thread that might have an answer, but the scene in question is pretty spoileryHow do they work anyway. Is it a terminator thing where it's skin over metal or do they have a bunch of fake organs.
I doubt it affects them since that would cause more problems for the employees.
The Bernard is a host theory is more ridiculous than William's from the past. He/it would have to be Ford's pet project, generations(plural) ahead of anything else. It would also render the whole park obsolete if we are to subscribe to the many hints of some bigger machinery driving this operation for reasons other than profit margin. Bernard is already there then, pack it up.
The Bernard is a host theory is more ridiculous than William's from the past. He/it would have to be Ford's pet project, generations(plural) ahead of anything else. It would also render the whole park obsolete if we are to subscribe to the many hints of some bigger machinery driving this operation for reasons other than profit margin. Bernard is already there then, pack it up.
you think so? i keep running into concepts that i cant quite reconcile well in my head in westworld
is it all for the realism? there are other aspects in ww that seems to run counter to that very idea to me....
.... am i overthinking things? seems like this thread is full with thinking, but maybe i'm not thinking about things in the right way. i will try to stop thinking about things.