Smackdown's been on Thursdays for a long time now. I think it's even going Wednesday in 2016 when it goes to USA.
yeah i fucked up, fixed the post
Smackdown's been on Thursdays for a long time now. I think it's even going Wednesday in 2016 when it goes to USA.
So Monday's rating was a 2.3 wasn't it? I have to say watching the show it does deserve that because of how it's so formulaic. Being accustomed to 20 minute promos at the start, awful promos such as the one Reigns did, 50/50 booking, constant reminders of what happened 5 minutes ago, I just know what to expect and can't see an average viewer stay tuned.
As polarizing as Vince Russo is, he had a list of 10 structural things he would do to the show which were right on the money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTz0zg3emI8
I remember I thought I'd die if I missed a Sunday night Heat.
Everything he says here is completely correct. The only point I'll comment on is his stress of continuity and that's simply impossible because McMahon forgets things week-to-week or McMahon changes his mind week-to-week. He'll actively sabotage continuity which is why we have the New Day laying out 4 guys on RAW's main event one week and zero followup or build the next week.As polarizing as Vince Russo is, he had a list of 10 structural things he would do to the show which were right on the money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTz0zg3emI8
Where else are you going to see the finish of a match wind up as a tombstone piledriver on an escalator. Certainly not on "every RAW looks and feels the same so who cares".You weren't a real fan if you skipped Shotgun Saturday Night.
Ted Turner got rid of WCW though. They could have had it run in a smaller capacity for a little while longer.
Ratings from WCW in that period got the same ratings the WWE is doing now.
Still more interesting than anything that happened on Raw this week. At least that was kind of memorable. I would have got the same thing out of watching 3 hours of TV static as I did watching Raw.
That was a worked shoot, it just didn't materialize due to external factors.
I remember I thought I'd die if I missed a Sunday night Heat.
You can't take either of them by their word. Hogan is ALWAYS working. He lies to fans all the time pretending to be shooting.hogan and bischoff didnt think so
You can't take either of them by their word. Hogan is ALWAYS working. He lies to fans all the time pretending to be shooting.
i got back into wrestling for a while thanks to shotgun saturday night. stopped watching regularly a little before eddy guerrero died.You weren't a real fan if you skipped Shotgun Saturday Night.
Not exactly a new occurance. I remember the Snackdown I went to a few years back had half the arena tapered off. If this is now a common occurance at minor shows, that sucks.
He's making really good points. Hire Russo back. It could not possibly be any worse.
WCW and TNA under him didn't exactly get great reviews or ratings, and there are plenty examples of Russo making extremely dumb decisions, but at this point I would take those two things than what we have now.
Ideally they would find a happy balance between keeping the good wrestling they have now, while finding more ways to hold attention and building new superstars.
Damn, I could've listen to that fpr an hour, that's really good. Give this goof another chance. Hell just get Paul in the room with those guys.So Monday's rating was a 2.3 wasn't it? I have to say watching the show it does deserve that because of how it's so formulaic. Being accustomed to 20 minute promos at the start, awful promos such as the one Reigns did, 50/50 booking, constant reminders of what happened 5 minutes ago, I just know what to expect and can't see an average viewer stay tuned.
As polarizing as Vince Russo is, he had a list of 10 structural things he would do to the show which were right on the money: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTz0zg3emI8
Shotgun was my shitEverything he says here is completely correct. The only point I'll comment on is his stress of continuity and that's simply impossible because McMahon forgets things week-to-week or McMahon changes his mind week-to-week. He'll actively sabotage continuity which is why we have the New Day laying out 4 guys on RAW's main event one week and zero followup or build the next week.
Also, his staff of soap opera reject writers aren't equipped to write multiple stand-alone segments each week because they simply don't know how and they refuse to trust the talent to develop those segments themselves. When they do write something, it turns into something horrendous like most of the "Divas Revolution" segments.
Where else are you going to see the finish of a match wind up as a tombstone piledriver on an escalator. Certainly not on "every RAW looks and feels the same so who cares".
have there been any reports on how many people are trying to become professional wrestlers these days? can't imagine too many people trying to become one these days.
are most of the old school wrestling schools closed? the wwe's situation reminds me of boxing these days. a lot of the boxing gyms have closed and the talent pool is dwindling. it's probably even worse for wrestling.Why would you? You used to be able to make a good living wrestling for WWF, WCW, or one of the territories. Now you can only do it wrestling for WWE or being one of the very top indy guys. Everyone else either does it because they like wrestling and have a day job or they are trying to get to that position. Getting into a business where only a few dozen people can make a living isn't good odds for anyone.
have there been any reports on how many people are trying to become professional wrestlers these days? can't imagine too many people trying to become one these days.
The moment he said JJ you knew it was fake. JJ drew as much as I do now(I just doodle when I get the chance.).
are most of the old school wrestling schools closed? the wwe's situation reminds me of boxing these days. a lot of the boxing gyms have closed and the talent pool is dwindling. it's probably even worse for wrestling.
Will WWE still be around in 2017?
They don't need to hire Russo. NXT proves that they have people who know how to make a compelling weekly wrestling show, they're just hamstrung by a control freak old man and his posse of garbage human beings.
They should just go all in on converting Crossfitters to wrestlers. Don't care for bulky ass traditional bodybuilders trying to do actual athletic moves.
WWE is way to large to fade away now. The brand has way to much potential value even if the McMahons lose control some media conglomerate will step in and fund it.
The moment he said JJ you knew it was fake. JJ drew as much as I do now(I just doodle when I get the chance.).
The main problem and the one that never gets addressed is that Vince and Dunn get bored of someone faster than the audience (Sandow) and they will totally pull the plug if they don't think it works, so the booking is horrendous, you can't build a new Austin or Rock or even a Cena if there's no consistency. I can't take someone seriously if he goes from losing for six months to beat everybody. Bryan's main event run was made of losses, but they were totally writing another Mankind underdog story there. Even someone like Punk, with the longest WWE championship reign of recent times and super over was starting to crumble and die due to the half assed midcard booking he was getting.
Hypothetical question.
If you had 100M in the bank.
And the WWE were to go out of business. Popping 1.0 ratings. Attendance at an all time low. Lost their USA deal. Stocks plummeting. Would you buy it for 25M? You get their entire video library and a few contracts and probably have to sink another 25-50M to make it profitable and get a new TV deal.
The trick is that you do long-term booking with your main event talent, limiting their appearances and preventing over-exposure. Essentially you treat ALL of those guys like Brock on TV... instead of just treating Brock that way. Having Rollins go out there and get humiliated every week... or any heel champ for that matter... is just ridiculous.Times have changed and there's more wrestling out there than ever before. Partly because of that fact, you can't really do long-term booking anymore without people getting bored and wondering when the conclusion is. The result of that is things changing quicker than they should. It's not ideal in the slightest, but that's just how things are now. You really think they can get away with a storyline that spans at least half a year without people complaining anymore? Just look at CM Punk's reign for a prime example.
And before someone says "well nxt does ____"; nxt is once a week, with aPPVnetwork special once every few months, if that. It's as old-school as you can get, with very little exposure compared to the main roster, so it works.
Hypothetical question.
If you had 100M in the bank.
And the WWE were to go out of business. Popping 1.0 ratings. Attendance at an all time low. Lost their USA deal. Stocks plummeting. Would you buy it for 25M? You get their entire video library and a few contracts and probably have to sink another 25-50M to make it profitable and get a new TV deal.
Hypothetical question.
If you had 100M in the bank.
And the WWE were to go out of business. Popping 1.0 ratings. Attendance at an all time low. Lost their USA deal. Stocks plummeting. Would you buy it for 25M? You get their entire video library and a few contracts and probably have to sink another 25-50M to make it profitable and get a new TV deal.
Times have changed and there's more wrestling out there than ever before. Partly because of that fact, you can't really do long-term booking anymore without people getting bored and wondering when the conclusion is. The result of that is things changing quicker than they should. It's not ideal in the slightest, but that's just how things are now. You really think they can get away with a storyline that spans at least half a year without people complaining anymore? Just look at CM Punk's reign for a prime example.
And before someone says "well nxt does ____"; nxt is once a week, with aPPVnetwork special once every few months, if that. It's as old-school as you can get, with very little exposure compared to the main roster, so it works.
Ratings from WCW in that period got the same ratings the WWE is doing now.
That segment is way better than anything wwe has done the past few years.