Of course, no need to repeat yourself when I agree lol
Point was Bethesda RPGs have huge appeal, that's it.. that was my entire point, their past game's sales was the evidence.. I wasn't saying anything about how many copies Starfield will sell, nor was I suggesting it will sell as much as Elden Ring. I was simply saying a game like ER doing well is evidence that the RPG genre is really healthy right now.
Well, I thought that statement was in passing reference to Starfield but maybe I was mistaken. I think Elden Ring could in theory always be argued as a wildcard of sorts, that game had several years of hype to build on.
But FWIW, it's not necessarily the only RPG doing well in the market. Diablo 4 & TOTK, FF XVI, etc. are all doing well sales-wise. I can't really think of a time in the past five years where RPGs were struggling to do strong or even decent numbers, actually.
We know that Oct to Dec 2022 was 3.2 million units so it looks like Jan to Mar was 1.3 million and Apr to June was 1.5 million. Of course we do not know each quarters X/S splits but that can't be helped.
Note: Revenue split is calculated by Welfare from InstallBase
Jesus Christ...2.8 million in six months...
Again, OG Xbox did ~ 6.2 million in its third year, which is already lower than XBO, which is lower than 360. Xbox Series is the worst-selling Xbox platform in the brand's history.
Like, how do you underperform your first console? How is that even possible? Microsoft found a way, credit where it's due
.
If the market grew say 3% and you grew 1%, well you're not even doing that, you're not keeping up.
The point is, put yourself in the shoes of an investor. Money has an opportunity cost, if I put money somewhere I'm not putting it somewhere else. If I am putting my money in company A that is stagnant while company B is not, then the obvious question is why didnt I put my money in company B, and what are they doing that company A isn't? After all, clearly there is growing demand for this product that company B is meeting and company A is not, so the problem isn't some abstract notion of "capitalism", it's clearly company A's behavior and actions.
Agreed to what is being said here. 1% growth is nothing for investors as, yeah, it basically is stagnant. The scary part for Xbox here being, Microsoft are masters at making numbers dance to optically give the impression of growth that isn't actually happening, so even with that "skill" at their disposal, they can only muster 1% growth overall to report to shareholders.
That must be really embarrassing for them.