RJMacready73
Simps for Amouranth
It still amazes me that people get so involved in their little digital avatars and want to play dressy up and then rage they can't play dressy up cause the dresses cost a fortune...
It still amazes me that people get so involved in their little digital avatars and want to play dressy up and then rage they can't play dressy up cause the dresses cost a fortune...
Just gonna censor myself here.
But imagine I wrote something very offensive and banworthy at blizzard's customers.
Can't find this one without the caption, goddammit.
Yeah to each their own, I think that set for the Sorcerer is cool honestly, it reminds me of W40K and I would love to get it but as a reward after I've accomplished something in the game. Not because I paid.We can agree to disagree on the "cool stuff" behind the paywall. I think there's a bunch of cool stuff that's free. I think I saw like 1 cool looking paid cosmetic set for the necro but nothing I would actually consider buying. Obviously subjective.
About the horse/armor, there's a bunch of customization you can do at the PVP merchant as well as another horse to buy. I think I have like 7 different horses with like 8 different armors and 8 different horse trophies. And I didn't buy anything from the shop.
And regarding Diablo 2, there was no customization lol. Your character was only based on what gear you had on. If you had an enigma or an oculus or a shako or whatever, you're always looking the same as everyone else. So that brings me to a question I'm curious about since you brought up D2. Would you rather there was no transmog, as well as no mtx? Every character would look exactly the same then especially in endgame playing the "meta" builds. Just like D2.
Regardless though, I'm not some rabid MTX fanatic. The mtx stuff in sports games for example is egregious. You basically need to buy your way up to compete in online modes. Diablo 4 just ain't like that though.
And it's shit, with the only skin available being really ugly.There's the regular one too, and it's free.
Thanks mate. Who's this guy, btw?
Thanks mate. Who's this guy, btw?
I'm enjoying the season without the BP. In fact, just ignoring all of the monetization features makes me enjoy it even more.
Yeah to each their own, I think that set for the Sorcerer is cool honestly, it reminds me of W40K and I would love to get it but as a reward after I've accomplished something in the game. Not because I paid.
Sure D4 is not the worst, my biggest issue is in fact the price. Imo a fair thing to do is once a year, with a big new season event they launch a battlepass for like 10 or 15 bucks. So those who play the game nonstop can support it while having the current paid content now free as rewards for quests, specific dungeons, or when you reach a certain renown.
As for the transmog question, I would answer why not both? Can't we have transmog and no MTX? Is it that hard? And you mention sports games, which is a good example. If we don't say stop now, it's going to end up like Fifa.
Blizzard will just try to push more and more to see what they can get away with, the problem being that the new generation of players will come to terms with this and accept it more and more, ruining the game.
And it's shit, with the only skin available being really ugly.
What's so awful about D4 and some other games, this is a paid game! They're still pulling this. And btw, I'm not innocent in all this, I've made terrible mistakes supporting titles like Destiny 2 in the past, but never again. Learnt from my mistakes, and I wish others would wake up.The die has been cast. Expect to see more of this stuff, especially in games that will be on GamePass and PSPlus.
That's why I said a battlepass once in a year would be a fair alternative. But I think your are missing my point as we are not talking about a small indie dev it's Blizzard and D4, at 70e, which already did a better start than any other Blizzard game.The battle pass (well new season) provides ~50 hours (maybe less if you're extremely quick, possibly double if not) of gameplay for either free or $10, every three months.
If the free option isn't enticing, and spending $40/year to support the game isn't appealing either (again that's 200-400 hours of gameplay for the $40 too), then find another game I guess.
I know with pinball games like Pinball FX they release new tables pretty frequently, like monthly or so, and they cost money every time. I don't just get them for free, and you know what, I'm happy to pay for them, because it goes in to getting more tables, which is something I want.
Right? I bought the battle pass because I'm still enjoying the game and I started a new character for this season, but it's hard to get too excited about customizing your guy when you're looking down from a bird's eye view 99% of the time.I just dont get it since your character is the size of a nickel on the screen so who gives a shit what they look like
Even weirder is people obsessing about skins in Overwatch for a character they can't even see 99% of the time.I just dont get it since your character is the size of a nickel on the screen so who gives a shit what they look like
I have no love at all for Fortnite, but Fortnite is also a free game.Which is why Fortnite is still the king of battlepasses regardless what you think of what's actually in it cosmetic wise. 8 euro for 1000 v-bucks and 950 v-bucks for the pass and you get 1450 v-bucks by the end of the pass. All games should adopt this kind of way.
lol thats what ive been saying. I open the store in Apex legends and i see some cool skins that would look great to use. I open the diablo store and im like whats the fucking point of buying boots...in a game where you are constantly surrounded by mobs and youre tiny. They need to add custom effects to skills or something.I just dont get it since your character is the size of a nickel on the screen so who gives a shit what they look like
That's like not how any game I've ever heard of ever works, hell I'm even surprised you can earn currency at all to pay for the premium BP.
"Aresti"? Are you sardinian?
This is such a weird argument that I kind of wish would go away. Cosmetic-only is an argument that only proves that putting items behind a paywall isn't going to lead to a pay-to-win scenario, but it doesn't mean that such paywalls aren't still a nickel and dime way of fleecing gamers. Back in the day, cosmetic-only were some of the coolest extras you could unlock in a game. Who doesn't love cosmetic items? Look, rewards are an integral part of game design. The makers of these games know this. Case in point, if these cosmetic rewards were as trivial as some make them out to be, people wouldn't pay money for them.Since its all cosmetics who cares...doesn't affect the actual gameplay. Should be cheaper but its not a necessity.
Capcom has done this with both of their fight passes for Street Fighter 6.
Haha no, but I dated a Greek girl decades ago with that name.She was a bitch but I loved her name."Aresti"? Are you sardinian?
This is such a weird argument that I kind of wish would go away. Cosmetic-only is an argument that only proves that putting items behind a paywall isn't going to lead to a pay-to-win scenario, but it doesn't mean that such paywalls aren't still a nickel and dime way of fleecing gamers. Back in the day, cosmetic-only were some of the coolest extras you could unlock in a game. Who doesn't love cosmetic items? Look, rewards are an integral part of game design. The makers of these games know this. Case in point, if these cosmetic rewards were as trivial as some make them out to be, people wouldn't pay money for them.
"Aresti" means "wild, untamed" in Sardinian.Haha no, but I dated a Greek girl decades ago with that name.She was a bitch but I loved her name.
But you can't exactly get all the premium rewards from the premium path like I was saying and indefinitely keep getting more premium paths can you?
LoL route.Where did these people think this was going to go?
Call of Duty and Fortnite both do this.Who honestly expected that paying $10 for the premium BP would generate enough in game currency to cover the price of the next premium BP for free, indefinitely?
You could totally pay for Fortnite's BP with earned currency indefinitely, at least up to this point. So yeah, a free game can do it, but a $70 game can't?Who honestly expected that paying $10 for the premium BP would generate enough in game currency to cover the price of the next premium BP for free, indefinitely?
That's like not how any game I've ever heard of ever works, hell I'm even surprised you can earn currency at all to pay for the premium BP.
If you don't want to pay for the premium BP, don't. There's the regular one too, and it's free.
Yep, pretty much.I find it strange how people fall for the bullshit and hype from these companies every single time. What has Blizzard done in the past 10 years that would make you think they care about their players and aim to make a sustainable, fair game that is friendly to the people playing it? This is not the company that released Diablo 2 or even Starcraft 2 (which was exploitative in its own way), they're just scum.
Then why not just include them in the PAID game in the first place? Let people keep playing to earn them in the game vs this battle pass bullshit. I know, the answer is "more money" greed, which is more important to them than the reputation and love of the game from fans.This is such a weird argument that I kind of wish would go away. Cosmetic-only is an argument that only proves that putting items behind a paywall isn't going to lead to a pay-to-win scenario, but it doesn't mean that such paywalls aren't still a nickel and dime way of fleecing gamers. Back in the day, cosmetic-only were some of the coolest extras you could unlock in a game. Who doesn't love cosmetic items? Look, rewards are an integral part of game design. The makers of these games know this. Case in point, if these cosmetic rewards were as trivial as some make them out to be, people wouldn't pay money for them.
I find it strange how people fall for the bullshit and hype from these companies every single time. What has Blizzard done in the past 10 years that would make you think they care about their players and aim to make a sustainable, fair game that is friendly to the people playing it? This is not the company that released Diablo 2 or even Starcraft 2 (which was exploitative in its own way), they're just scum.
Which is why Fortnite is still the king of battlepasses regardless what you think of what's actually in it cosmetic wise. 8 euro for 1000 v-bucks and 950 v-bucks for the pass and you get 1450 v-bucks by the end of the pass. All games should adopt this kind of way.