Yes 2022, surely the pinnacle of rational thought on this topic.
Do you know the pronoun for a non-binary entity has been since day one?
IT
"My pencil is over there, can you get it for me?"
"That's my friend. It's name is Taash"
See, no explanation needed! English wasn't the problem here.
It is genuinely the most retarded trend in our modern day society.
100 years from now when you're nothing but bones, there will be only one way to identify your gender. I genuinely dislike how the term 'gender' has been hijacked to become utterly devoid of any meaning whatsoever.
Yes 2022, surely the pinnacle of rational thought on this topic.
Do you know the pronoun for a non-binary entity has been since day one?
IT
"My pencil is over there, can you get it for me?"
"That's my friend. It's name is Taash"
See, no explanation needed! English wasn't the problem here.
If the game is great and the story is interesting, what difference does it make?
If the game is lame and the story is shit, what difference does it make?
People that judge the game simply by existence of non binary characters are as stupid as Era dwellers.
It's the same kind of stupidity.
This game is so far removed from the original offering it can hardly be considered part of the same franchise.
Ultimately, there is no real desire of behalf of the typical fantasy demographic to insert gender theory in this game. One could easily argue its inclusion turns away many more customers than it attracts.
It’s funny. Optionality could literally solve this problem for everyone. Simply add a toggle to enable | disable such divisive content… aka Saudi Mode. I wouldn’t care if the developer made simultaneously the most woke and least woke game imaginable if there was a toggle for it…
It’s ultimately the best compromise but sadly no one has yet had the courage to attempt it.
Sure, and at an individual level, its usually pretty easy to accomodate folks that feel this way. BUUUUUT that doesn't mean we should be rewriting our language and instituting laws over it, nor getting lectures about it in our video games (or at least we shouldn't be called bigots if we don't like it).But for most of them it's just a preference, it makes them feel more comfortable. It's not a big deal.
"I'm non-binary. Which swim team should I be on and which locker room can I change in? Which bathroom should I use? What roommate can I have and if they are uncomfortable with my external genitalia are they a horrible bigot? Which gender can I punch in the head for sport?"You keep bringing up the sports thing, like I really think you are very confused about the difference between trans and non-binary, and I am kind of feeling like Dragon Age might be a good educational experience for you.
But, but, but, language can CHANGE....right? Far easier to recontextualize a word and still be clear in conversation than to rewrite grammar entirely, plus make language difficult. Read any article talking about Ezra Miller. IF, and that's an IF, you consider being referred to the english "non-gender pronoun" IT to be a slur, then maybe, just maybe, spend your energies on gaining more acceptance for the word IT rather than insist on some sort of plurality status which is frankly ludicrous. Or do the Zee/Zir thing, that at least is legible and understandable and might be a worthy addition to the english language. I've read entire book series that use it and its fine."It" can also refer to inanimate objects, and can thus be considered dehumanizing and rude.
"They", while potentially confusing, is properly understood in the right context, and is definitely referring to a person, which makes it more polite when referring to people.
There are similar instances of this in other languages too, not just English.
You are "latinx" whether you like it or not!Wow, just got wind that the brazillian portuguese translation of Veilguard basically butchers our language to make gender neutral "grammar" fit into sentences.
Jeez, this is savage.
Feelings don't have any impact on biology."It" can also refer to inanimate objects, and can thus be considered dehumanizing and rude.
"They", while potentially confusing, is properly understood in the right context, and is definitely referring to a person, which makes it more polite when referring to people.
There are similar instances of this in other languages too, not just English.
Sure, it already has, but not the way you want it. That happens sometimes.But, but, but, language can CHANGE....right?
Far easier to recontextualize a word and still be clear in conversation than to rewrite grammar entirely, plus make language difficult.
Feelings don't have any impact on biology.
What? You are perverting science to accommodate feelings. Language is how we communicate information. It doesn't invalidate science.Which is why we're talking about language and not biology.
I'm talking about the language that everyday humans use to communicate about everyday things.What? You are perverting science to accommodate feelings. Language is how we communicate information. It doesn't invalidate science.
Biology doesn't care about what is rude. What are you talking about?I'm talking about the language that everyday humans use to communicate about everyday things.
Trust me, actual biologists have lots of vocabulary to describe human biology just fine already.
I don't believe non-binary is a real thing, I do believe a small number of people feel they were born in the wrong body but not the huge number of people who claim to be trans now when in reality most of them are just attention seeking cross dressers. That being said as long as this is just an option and can be ignored after that I don't really care too much, giving players choices in an RPG isn't really a bad thing. Now if they forced you to be trans or a side character was constantly lecturing about misgendering and dead naming they could screw off.Disgusting, don't support this shit
Bioware is dead
Biology doesn't care about what is rude. What are you talking about?
I agree.I don't believe non-binary is a real thing, I do believe a small number of people feel they were born in the wrong body but not the huge number of people who claim to be trans now when in reality most of them are just attention seeking cross dressers. That being said as long as this is just an option and can be ignored after that I don't really care too much, giving players choices in an RPG isn't really a bad thing. Now if they forced you to be trans or a side character was constantly lecturing about misgendering and dead naming they could fuck off.
if you use a non descriptor such as non binary you are an it. It is a made up term. Feelings don't matter for biology or language. Expecting people to conform to your fantasy is laughable.I told you, I'm talking about how everyday humans communicate with each other, where social decorum is important. This is linguistics not biology. Choosing "they" rather than "it" for a singular personal pronoun isn't denying science, don't be ridiculous.
if you use a non descriptor such as non binary you are an it. It is a made up term. Feelings don't matter for biology or language. Expecting people to conform to your fantasy is laughable.
Don't be ridiculous.
No matter how much you and your vocal minority wants this to be true you are wrong. Trendy language takes no knee to basic science. Market has spoken. Woke bullshit failed and with good reason. Cope more.Language is a result of how people at large use words. What is in the dictionary is descriptive, not prescriptive. Popular use dictates the evolution of language within a population, and it's already moved. You might not like it, but those facts don't care about your feelings.
No matter how much you and your vocal minority wants this to be true you are wrong. Trendy language takes no knee to basic science. Market has spoken. Woke bullshit failed and with good reason. Cope more.
good night bruvI don't make the rules bro. I'm acknowledging the reality we live in. Again, basic science isn't being sacrificed for language. They both still function just fine. Biological males aren't being referred to as females in discussions about sex in biology papers.
I don't make the rules bro. I'm acknowledging the reality we live in. Again, basic science isn't being sacrificed for language. They both still function just fine. Biological males aren't being referred to as females in discussions about sex in biology papers.
Bill Nye erased his old Science Guy episode about chromosomes and Joe Rogan tells people space isn’t real. Science is replaced with idiocracy.I'd have a lot more time for the trans movement if they accepted the former point. Science is science.
Bill Nye erased his old Science Guy episode about chromosomes and Joe Rogan tells people space isn’t real. Science is replaced with idiocracy.
Wow, just got wind that the brazillian portuguese translation of Veilguard basically butchers our language to make gender neutral "grammar" fit into sentences.
Jeez, this is savage.
How so? Do they end nouns with "e" instead of "a" and/or "o" as in most Romance languages?
It seems that was due to usage rights, unless this report is inaccurate.Bill Nye erased his old Science Guy episode about chromosomes
When the company decided to start selling old episodes on iTunes and other platforms, Disney quickly determined it wouldn’t make financial sense to upload all 100, and the company picked 31 of the most popular titles to distribute.
“It was a financial consideration,” said a spokesperson. “This sale isn’t super lucrative, so it doesn’t make sense to do all of them.”
Of those selected 31 episodes, the company still had to go through and determine what music and talent rights they had – and whether they could get clearance from performers. In some cases, if Disney couldn’t get ahold of an actor, that segment was pulled.
And indeed, Disney said many segments were pulled from those episodes due to standard music and clearance issues.
In other words, the (likely) low-level staffer charged with clearing the rights for “Bill Nye the Science Guy” in 2007 wasn’t thinking at all about gender politics – he or she probably wasn’t even listening to what that young person standing in front of the chalkboard was saying. That person couldn’t be found (it had been 10 years after all, and back in 1996 no one was including a digital run in actor contracts) – so the segment was yanked.
When Netflix added “Bill Nye the Science Guy” to its lineup, Disney/ABC gave the streamer the 31 episodes that had been cleared in the after market. (The remaining 69 episodes sit somewhere in a vault, but it probably won’t ever be worth clearing and paying royalties on those episodes.)
Ah yes, the world's chief scientists Bill Nye and Joe RoganBill Nye erased his old Science Guy episode about chromosomes and Joe Rogan tells people space isn’t real. Science is replaced with idiocracy.
Always feels to me like people are getting two distinct things confused in this discussion: sex and gender.
Up till fairly recently "he" was almost always used when gender was unknown or unspecified. Like in an instruction manual, textbook, or something like that. Then "they" (referring to the nebulous powers that be) started the "he/she" equality practice, and that evolved into "they" for a singular gender unknown person. But is TERRIBLE in actual use, very ambiguous and confusing. Redefining "it" to include this very tiny group of people would have been a far more elegant solution, at least in terms of not getting the language freaks up in armsSingular they was used for unknown antecedents ("I caught someone rummaging around in the trash today." "Oh, who was it?" "I didn't see their face."). Its use to refer to known antecedents of indeterminate gender ("This is Woketard, our new intern. They'll be with us for the next two months.") is a strictly modern innovation.
Gender, being a social construct, would require no body altering medical procedures to 'change'It always seems like the extremes on both ends either deliberately want them to be the same thing or are being too obtuse to grasp the fact that they can be separate things. It's exhausting.
Seems to be even worse than just that, changing articles and making certain sentences hard to comprehend at first glance. Don't know if you're familiar with portuguese, but here's an image that someone posted on a brazillian gaming subreddit:
Gender, being a social construct, would require no body altering medical procedures to 'change'
Always feels to me like people are getting two distinct things confused in this discussion: sex and gender.
It always seems like the extremes on both ends either deliberately want them to be the same thing or are being too obtuse to grasp the fact that they can be separate things. It's exhausting.
Gender is a societal construct with no basis in biology. Therefore it's got a lot more wiggle room.
I told you, I'm talking about how everyday humans communicate with each other, where social decorum is important. This is linguistics not biology. Choosing "they" rather than "it" for a singular personal pronoun isn't denying science, don't be ridiculous.
But sex and gender ARE the same thing, and were used interchangeably FOREVER until fairly recently when trying to tease gender away from sex became trendy. But there is no real reason to do so, gender is meaningless without being inextricably tied to sex. And sex is, for virtually every human in existence, based on XX or XY chromosomes. To think of gender as some sort of psychological overlay of biological sex is just pseudoscience wankery. There are males, regardless of how they act, and there are females, regardless of how they act. Thats it. Humans, and mammals/vertebrates in general, are not a species that fluctuates in that fashion.It always seems like the extremes on both ends either deliberately want them to be the same thing or are being too obtuse to grasp the fact that they can be separate things. It's exhausting.
For lack of a better explanation, they have literally whittled down being a woman to wearing a costume. (For trans women) It should be extremely insulting to women that the real struggles and issues they face are thrown to the wind for the applause given to these brave "women". Both men and women have huge weight and expectations put on their shoulders (having children for one, protection and providing for the other). You can't cosplay your way to understanding what it is to be a man or a woman.Gender, being a social construct, would require no body altering medical procedures to 'change'
Using they/them for singular is plain stupid, besides a communication atrocity.
Language, like science, is efficient. Every language on this planet aims to express the most information with the least words. For that purpose, it must be precise and describe real concepts of the real world.
The reason why nobody speaks the inclusive neo-language in real-life conversations is because it goes against every language convention. When you refer to a singular female as "they" in front of others, you need further clarification on the actual identity of that person to avoid confusion.
Language is a tool. Using tools incorrectly for the sake of social virtue is a sick state of mind that should never be encouraged, let alone imposed.
Not "a few years ago"yeah, but these things have been used literally interchangeably for ages, up until a few years ago.
Though sex and gender have been used interchangeably at least as early as the fourteenth century, this usage was not common by the late 1900s.[15] Sexologist John Money pioneered the concept of a distinction between biological sex and gender identity in 1955.[16][17] However, Issac Madison Bentley had already defined gender as the "socialized obverse of sex" a decade earlier, in 1945.[18][19] As originally conceived by Money, gender and sex are analysed together as a single category including both biological and social elements, but later work by Robert Stoller separated the two, designating sex and gender as biological and cultural categories, respectively.[20][improper synthesis?] Before the work of Bentley, Money and Stoller, the word gender was only regularly used to refer to grammatical categories.[21][22][23]