• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

EA had a fantastic 2013, huh?

Mooreberg

is sharpening a shovel and digging a ditch
EA winning once again in The Consumerist poll has to be a slam dunk at this point. This might have been their worst year ever.
 
The Consumerist might as well replace the other companies in the tournament bracket with all videogame publishers, a Gamefaqs style battle would probably draw alot more attention throughout the course of the voting.
 

Omikaru

Member
Wow. Gaf cynicism at its worst. That's right my fellow gamers, every facet of Electronic Arts is out to ruin your life and haunt your dreams. This year might not have been the best for the company in terms of PR, but my god. THE WORST COMPANY IN THE WORLD would not give money to charity or participate in a program like The Humble Indie Bundle.

Just keep in that in mind and vote with your money. You have every right to ignore EA outright. No harm to you.

Edit: Oh yeah, no more of these either.

I love how you quoted a specific part of my post, even though afterwards I made a point of not being completely cynical and actually offering a constructive argument, which was summarily ignored. Probably because the angle you're taking is that everything has to be in black and white: EA is either saintly, or a fucking evil demon corporation from hell out to pilfer money from our wallets at every opportunity. There can't be any granularity in how they act and the things they do. Jeez.

A ploy to get people into Origin? Right... that is why they included a copy for both steam and origin. You only needed origin if you wanted to play games that are only located on origin.

I can't express my frustration at reading all these posts trying to twist EA's donating all the profits (this is not even normal for humble bundles) to charity into some evil motivated act of selfishness and/or depravity. And the bundle they put up was amazing...

You too (in regards to taking my quote out of context). At least you tried to make a valid point.

And of course it was a ploy to get people to use Origin, amongst other things including being tax deductible. Are you actually implying that a company did this because they wanted to be good citizens or something? There is always an ulterior motive. That doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing, because if something benefits EA also benefits society, then where's the harm? Ultimately, EA getting more Origin users is seen as a plus, and they also they get good PR from the charity donation, get tax deductions, and the charities they chose to donate to also get a nice fat paycheck, which (hopefully) is spent wisely.

Also, what you said about Steam alternatives being offered where available isn't entirely true. The Sims 3 is on Steam, but no Steam key was given. Just saying.
 
Wow. Gaf cynicism at its worst. That's right my fellow gamers, every facet of Electronic Arts is out to ruin your life and haunt your dreams. This year might not have been the best for the company in terms of PR, but my god. THE WORST COMPANY IN THE WORLD would not give money to charity or participate in a program like The Humble Indie Bundle.

Just keep in that in mind and vote with your money. You have every right to ignore EA outright. No harm to you.

Edit: Oh yeah, no more of these either.

Think of what you would consider the worst company in America

Got one in your head?

They donated to charity
 

Zabka

Member
Didn't even finish the tutorial in NFS Rivals before boxnig it up to return it. Got trapped outside of the road where almost any movement caused a crash until I finally broke free into a giant frictionless bowl.

At least AC4 only fucked up at the end for me.
 

DrSlek

Member
I'm actually not an industry insider and am just basing my opinion off of stuff that is known.
A lot of the information has been gathered on wikipedia and if you read about the individual games in the EA Partners program you'll see many of them caused considerable trouble for the developer and/or resulted in a poorly received end-product. These include APB, Brutal Legend, FUSE, Hellgate:London, Kingdoms of Amalur, and Syndicate. Some also had potential to be expanded and grown but were not given the chance such as BulletStorm. EA was probably not directly responsible for all of these games' failures, but the pattern isn't pretty. The recent TitanFall (also an EA Partners game) news on twitter also shows they still have issues to work on.

I was under the impression that the EA partners program isn't really a publishing arrangement. Instead, they really offer a menu of services. The Titanfall exclusivity deal with Microsoft suggests that the partners program isn't as altruistic as advertised. Makes me wonder how much responsibility EA has for the Fuse/Overstrike development shift....
 

Aaron

Member
I was under the impression that the EA partners program isn't really a publishing arrangement. Instead, they really offer a menu of services. The Titanfall exclusivity deal with Microsoft suggests that the partners program isn't as altruistic as advertised. Makes me wonder how much responsibility EA has for the Fuse/Overstrike development shift....
Developer has said that they didn't, but unless the gameplay was also going to be radically different, I don't think it would have altered sales in any measurable way. It was essentially more Gears when people were tired of Gears.
 
And of course it was a ploy to get people to use Origin, amongst other things including being tax deductible. Are you actually implying that a company did this because they wanted to be good citizens or something? There is always an ulterior motive. That doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing, because if something benefits EA also benefits society, then where's the harm? Ultimately, EA getting more Origin users is seen as a plus, and they also they get good PR from the charity donation, get tax deductions, and the charities they chose to donate to also get a nice fat paycheck, which (hopefully) is spent wisely.

Also, what you said about Steam alternatives being offered where available isn't entirely true. The Sims 3 is on Steam, but no Steam key was given. Just saying.

You seem to enjoy focusing on the negativity and assumed selfishness of a situation. That actually is quite cynical by definition. EA was very generous in the way they did the humble bundle. And a single game being not offered for steam as well as origin doesn't invalidate my point.
 
Wow. Gaf cynicism at its worst. That's right my fellow gamers, every facet of Electronic Arts is out to ruin your life and haunt your dreams. This year might not have been the best for the company in terms of PR, but my god. THE WORST COMPANY IN THE WORLD would not give money to charity or participate in a program like The Humble Indie Bundle.

Just keep in that in mind and vote with your money. You have every right to ignore EA outright. No harm to you.

Edit: Oh yeah, no more of these either.
No one said they were the worst company in the world. Just America.
 
Don't forget the refund policy in Origin. I can't think of any other "good" they did.

The final three The Sims 3 expansions (University Life, Island Paradise, and Into the Future) were excellent.The two stuff packs (70s,80s,90s and Movies) were much better than their average stuff packs.
 

Mengy

wishes it were bannable to say mean things about Marvel
Curious to see how the company's future plays out this gen.

Hoping for the worst, to be honest.

They make a lot of bad decisions for gamers, but they also make a lot of money and profit off those bad decisions. Simcity, despite however horrible the game is, sold well over a million copies. BF4 despite all of it's problems has sold much more than that. EA is very good at two things: releasing on time and making money. To them that's priority, actually making a good finished game is secondary. As long as people keep blindly buying EA's games they will do just fine with this business model.


Out of curiosity, which major publishers do people like? EA is obviously not well liked. Activision also gets a great deal of criticism. What about Ubisoft? Take 2? What about major Japanese publishers like Capcom? SquareEnix? Sega?

Blizzard, Valve, those are two game companies that I pretty much never have a second thought about buying their games on day one for whatever price they want. Diablo III was a rare clusterfuck for Blizzard, and it is being addressed in spades with it's expansion (and patches did a decent job up til now). Stardock is a decent company that I cautiously buy day one, Elemental was an exception but I like Stardock's principles and their behavior towards it's customers. Firaxis seems to always release great games and follow up with fantastic support.

All great game devs IMHO have one thing in common: they listen to their customers and treat them like partners, not money pinatas. EA falls way on the other side of the fence from what I consider a good developer, doing exactly the opposite in most situations. I truthfully have not bought an EA game in years, and I ALWAYS wait for customer reviews and opinions on their games before buying. That's probably why I haven't bought any of their games in years.....
 
ivxGYfmCOMBY5.gif
 

Laughing Banana

Weeping Pickle
I am constantly baffled by the fact that how many gamers such as in GAF can continue to continuously disparage and make fun of EA and EA suck this and that and yet they still buy their games anyways.

Case in point, Battlefield 4. No matter how many people say Battlefield 4 sucks/incomplete/trash/whatever I am perfectly willing to bet that a lot of the same people that complain will buy Battlefield 5 anyways.
 

RetroGreg

Member
The sim city water issue on iPad is just terrible. They always put it on sale still and just let people suffer through it.
 
I am constantly baffled by the fact that how many gamers such as in GAF can continue to continuously disparage and make fun of EA and EA suck this and that and yet they still buy their games anyways.

Case in point, Battlefield 4. No matter how many people say Battlefield 4 sucks/incomplete/trash/whatever I am perfectly willing to bet that a lot of the same people that complain will buy Battlefield 5 anyways.

That is probably true, but the hope is that the number of those people returning to the well is dwindling fast with each and every entry in the series and even more that EA takes notice of this fact. It's a hard thing for some to break away from a game series that rocked for several years. I personally lost investment after the Bad Company games. (Thinking back, what an apropos title for EA to use)
 

DenogginizerOS

BenjaminBirdie's Thomas Jefferson
Given the recent story about EA's payola scheme that somewhat mirrors Microsoft's payola scheme, this quote from Peter Moore on the controversy over canceling Dead Space 3 and his disdain for the tactics used by people to get clicks is somewhat ironic:

Peter Moore said:
"Standard, shoddy website journalism recipe, born out of a desperate need to increase click-thru rates to support advertising revenue," he wrote. "Fabricate a story using an 'unnamed source,' post it first thing in the morning, add the letters 'EA' to the story (oh, and link it to micro-transactions - always a fan favourite) and then stand back and enjoy the vitriol which you turn into revenue. Rinse and repeat...
 

nib95

Banned
Given the recent story about EA's payola scheme that somewhat mirrors Microsoft's payola scheme, this quote from Peter Moore on the controversy over canceling Dead Space 3 and his disdain for the tactics used by people to get clicks is somewhat ironic:

It's deliciously ironic.
 

Bebpo

Banned
I remember the year they were awesome with Dead Space 1, Mirror's Edge and some other stuff.

That was a while ago
 
Looking at the list of EA games released in 2013, I'm happy to say I didn't buy a single one! (played PvZ 2, but didn't spend a dime on it, nor will I even though I do enjoy it). In 2012 I think I only bought 2 (Mass Effect 3, and I think SSX at a reduced price), so I'm improving!

I still have a soft spot for Bioware, so I'll probably get Dragon Age, but only AFTER reviews and impressions are out.
 

ScrubJay

Member
Mass Effect 3 was the last decent game EA released and the best part of the game (the multiplayer) wasn't even half assed by them. It was just given the go ahead, then just let it be until they noticed it existed. Hopefully ME4 MP is half as good as ME3 MP but I'm not optimistic given recent trends.
 
OP, you should probably play Dead Space 3 before bringing out the microtransaction card. The game was not "riddled" with them, nor did it affect it in a negative fashion. The human fights were also limited to maybe a dozen at most throughout the entire game,
First chapter, few encounters during the fetch quests on the planet, and 3 or so in the city.
and weren't "action set pieces" sans one Gears/Uncharted inspired piece that last all of one minute, if that.

It's ok to hate the practice and change of tone, as it wasn't necessary, but you could at least bother to know the product if you're going to take this much time already to write about it. Game had far more notable issues that actually scarred the series.

With that said, I agree with your beating of this dead EA horse. We go from having a guy running the company that has a gamer mindset, but terrible at business; to having this company now being purely by the numbers that is handling business worse arguably by barely maintaining their current staples.

However, I'll go on to argue that this is hardly just an EA issue, just that EA has been the one to as of late and most often to fuck up their established quality franchises and dive head first in experimenting through monetization.
 
That is a great OP.

Considering how they did this year, I'm amazed they are doing as well as they are. I guess you can fuck up a lot of stuff when you have Madden and FIFA to carry you. Battlefield 4 did sell well but had a lot of issues.
 
Top Bottom