Dumb it down B
aka what does it mean?
Fox is losing a fuck ton of money.
Dumb it down B
aka what does it mean?
Yup.Fox is losing a fuck ton of money.
And then you factor in the cut that the movie theaters take.Damn, that's half the budget of the movie.
This related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
...
...wait for it...
According to polled audience members on opening weekend, the two worst superhero movies ever made are these two:
Yeah, Warners also passed on buying Marvel once, too. $200 mil.
So did Sony, actually.
I forgot the Spirited existed. AM I crazy did the comic have some suspect shit?
By suspect shit you mean the best goddamn art. Then yes.
This related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
...
...wait for it...
According to polled audience members on opening weekend, the two worst superhero movies ever made are these two:
This related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
]
The Phantom was pretty good
Are wasn't that advanced in the 40s man
"Everything I've heard would indicate that the studio will move forward with a Fantastic Four sequel," Drew McWeeny of HitFix reports. "It may not make that original 2017 date, but they're definitely planning to make it."
During this mess, sources from everywhere have been crawling out of the woodwork to provide details on what went wrong between the director and the studio. Trank claimed in his now-infamous tweet that he had a "fantastic" film at one time, but McWeeny heard much differently. "He may claim that his cut a year ago was amazing, but that opinion was not shared by the majority of the people working on the film," McWeeny wrote. "There were internal conversations at that point about potentially scrapping everything. That's how strong the concerns were."
This related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
...
...wait for it...
According to polled audience members on opening weekend, the two worst superhero movies ever made are these two:
I forgot the Spirited existed. AM I crazy did the comic have some suspect shit?
X1 was far from trash. Low-budget, lacking in specatacle, sure. But for the first time, we had a superhero movie that was a step beyond just being a comic book movie. That had some social relevance, that had a conflict beyond megalomania and campy highjinks. Even Blade just a year earlier easily fell into that trap of "well, it's still a silly comic book movie".
they also said there'd be Spider-man movies and a DBZ sequel
Sony was still going to move forward with about a half dozen Spider-Man movies right after ASM2.
Not that this is going to send Fox to dealing with Marvel anytime soon, but the movie just opened literally a couple days ago. Their first move can't be to be seen running in the complete opposite direction, even if they end up doing it eventually.
Sony was still going to move forward with about a half dozen Spider-Man movies right after ASM2.
Not that this is going to send Fox to dealing with Marvel anytime soon, but the movie just opened literally a couple days ago. Their first move can't be to be seen running in the complete opposite direction, even if they end up doing it eventually.
I'll believ it when I see it.
How many films lose that type of money and get a sequel ?
Drew McWeeny said:Josh Trank may have fired off his disgruntled Tweet late Thursday night, but there are things about what he said that don't sit right with me. Trank had the studio's support on this film far longer than would seem justified because Fox was so very aware of how it would look if they pushed the young filmmaker off of his movie. They made him work for the greenlight before they decided to go ahead with the movie, and whatever Trank wants to say about how he was handled, he was the one who directed the film. The studio wasn't making daily changes or forcing him to shoot material he didn't help create. They were doing everything they could to keep him on schedule and on budget, and they surrounded him with crew that they trusted. They wanted this film to work. Even when things weren't working, the studio still worked to find a way to have Trank solve those problems. He may claim that his cut a year ago was amazing, but that opinion was not shared by the majority of the people working on the film. There were internal conversations at that point about potentially scrapping everything. That's how strong the concerns were. Even so, they decided to back Trank while looking for ways to fix the movie, and the end result is the film audiences largely didn't bother to see in theaters this weekend.
Everything I've heard would indicate that the studio will move forward with a "Fantastic Four" sequel. It may not make that original 2017 date, but they're definitely planning to make it. The next filmmaker in is going to start from a difficult position, and they're going to have to work hard to create their own movie while starting with some of Trank's choices intact. For better or worse, Trank was given room to define these characters, and his signature will remain on the next film no matter who writes and directs it. The next movie will be a reaction to this one. What remains to be seen is whether or not this incident overall will test Fox's resolve to try to support their filmmakers. It would be understandable if they suddenly reverted to the way things used to be, when you did what Fox said or they would just steamroll you.
You probably have to wait at least a decade before trying another Fantastic Four movie at this point.
But knowing Fox, they'll get a different director and put another one out in 3 years.
So what's the likelihood that discussion with Marvel are already underway? Kind of like how Marvel had a different scripts for Civil War way before it was announced Spiderman was joining the MCU
http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20121227052008/powerlisting/images/e/e5/Lady_Deathstrike_Swag.gif
Nah.
This related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
...
...wait for it...
According to polled audience members on opening weekend, the two worst superhero movies ever made are these two:
You also believe Otto is the superior Spider-Man.
At least The Spirit had naked Eva mendesThis related article was posted earlier, regarding CinemaScore (usually a pretty useless metric) noting that Fantastic Four was the lowest score for a big budget superhero film from a major studio.
But it's the lowest CinemaScore for any superhero movie period - tied only with...
...
...wait for it...
According to polled audience members on opening weekend, the two worst superhero movies ever made are these two:
...the plot was silly though, I'll turn the worlds leaders into mutants and lets see what they do NOW when 120- 200 people are now mutants after i use my ...magnetic powered mutant making (thats some crazy good tech) machine. Gee I dunno Mags...probably throw them under the bus and have the people just below them supplant most of them...oh yeah..
Like his sidekick EBONY WHITE
...the plot was silly though, I'll turn the worlds leaders into mutants and lets see what they do NOW when 120- 200 people are now mutants after i use my ...magnetic powered mutant making (thats some crazy good tech) machine. Gee I dunno Mags...probably throw them under the bus and have the people just below them supplant most of them...oh yeah..
And that he's a radical activist/terrorist rather than a supervillian. He was trying to make a point,Some one missed the point. Magneto intended to expose human hypocrisy.
Some one missed the point. Magneto intended to expose human hypocrisy.
Oh man, yes, please!I would pay money to see Singer handle Genosha or even Asteroid M
By pay money I mean when it hits cable
C'mon, link to the original article. It's not hard to find.