Fbh
Member
1080p60 with that visual? Nah.
I'll not defend UE5 abysmal perfornance this gen, but running a game at 1920x1080 so late this gen with this art style is not something to be praise imo.
Just a little reminder that this game took 5 years.
I mean, 1080p is not amazing but given how many AAA games these days can't even get to that full HD baseline I still think it's a win.
Specially with DF mentioning it's almost locked 60fps with only rare drops.
People are surprised this is reviewing good?
Yeah I don't get it.
It's a "more of the same" Sony sequel which we already know review well (Forbidden West 88 Meta, Ragnarok 94 meta, Spiderman 2 90 meta).
The first game didn't review amazingly well (83) but it went up to a 87 with the directors cut.
Why anyone was expecting this to get a bunch of 6-7/10 reviews is beyond me.