Lets assume Dragon Warrior is weaker than aggro shaman and token druid, they're still a tier 1 deck listed higher than 90% of the other decks. And many of those decks you listed aren't even good enough to make a top deck report because they don't go that low.
Look at the last tempo storm meta report.
I bet fool's bane would be fine in a midrange list. I think it's a matter of time before people find a great list for it.
I have a bad habit. I can't help but emote Oops at the end of any game I win against aggro shaman, dragon warrior or hunter. I can't stop.
My meta right now though is nothing but mages, druids and thousands of hunters. I haven't seen a shaman or dragon warrior in at least 15 games.
Why would I be trolling? If you think Yshaarj Hunter is a deck that is worth listing as a playable list then I will for sure be listing Bolster deck as I think it is far superior and consistent than it.
The bias is so obvious that I don't know why I am even discussing here.
can i put yogg in my resurrection priest or is that bad juju? i run nexus champ instead of priestess cos i don't have priestess and the extra cards help and its good to bishop and it gives hits for pyro etc. i feel like its not that crazy since you survive really late anyway and it wouldn't be that bad from bishop or res really
My stats last month:
Warrior - 24% of all ranked matches. That's pretty huge considering there are 9 classes. Nearly 5 times as much warriors than priests or rogues. And almost 10% higher than the next highest.
You can put yogg in any deck with more than 10 spells.
Yes, Warrior was clearly the best class in the old gods meta, and Dragon Warrior was the best deck. No one is disputing that.
So far they don't have the best deck in the Kara meta.
I guess an argument can be made that it's the best class, but I'm not sure what that even means.
I guess we'll see in a couple months. If there's a big warrior resurgence, awesome. Somehow I doubt it since I don't think Hunter is going to go away.
Half the decks you listed were gimmick though. That's why I brought up Bolster.You brought up Bolster first. I wouldn't list gimmick decks if you didn't start it.
I agree that your anti warrior bias is making this discussion hard to have.
Has anybody seen many pirate warriors? It looks like they are as close to a hard counter of hunters as there is.
I wonder what would happen if Blizzard gave a bunch of pros 2 months to develop a game balance using all the cards instead of rotating in and out expansions, I wonder if it would be any better or whether the game is just hamstrung by the format.
Never knew that Jaraxxus triggers snipe. That's brutal.
Even sacred trial and repentance.
It's disgusting to read people on reddit justify yogg.
"To the majority of people who play or would be interested in watching HS highlights, they're into the single serving 30 second clips where a Yogg wins the game or when a single crazy turn pulls out a win. Seeing the nuance in something is always hard for large audiences.
Explaining this line of play to someone who spends an hour or two on the game a month to hit rank 20, they're not really going to understand it. Show them a cool Yogg, they're going to be like "Oh Hell yeah, that's sick, I'm gonna craft that Yogg card.""
People can get yogg clips anywhere, they don't have to be from a tournament. Just dumb people justifying dumb stuff.
I know it sounds dumb, but deep in there I see a point, one of the reasons I joined HS for the long run back there in april 28th was because of how funny yogg is (yeah, yeah, tournaments and meta), and that might be actually something the devs thought back then, however, banning the card from standard right now is opening a can of worms from Blizz
also, oddly enough... since back when I started, I haven obtained yogg...
If the tournament scene withers and dwindles away, as viewership drops, hearthstone ends up being exposed much less to new players. And not to mention the frustrations of the playerbase itself. It's not a tournament only problem tbh. I feel ripped off by yogg losses as much as any pro does.
I crafted yogg. I've used it a lot. It's not like I hate the card by any means, I just think it pushes meta too much with too much variance. If tempo mage remains a top tier deck, which it might, people are going to start facing more and more matches decided by yoggsaron. I think it's going to get worse.
If the tournament scene withers and dwindles away, as viewership drops, hearthstone ends up being exposed much less to new players. And not to mention the frustrations of the playerbase itself. It's not a tournament only problem tbh. I feel ripped off by yogg losses as much as any pro does.
I crafted yogg. I've used it a lot. It's not like I hate the card by any means, I just think it pushes meta too much with too much variance. If tempo mage remains a top tier deck, which it might, people are going to start facing more and more matches decided by yoggsaron. I think it's going to get worse.
I think it's a great example of how Hearthstone's dev team cares more about making money than making the game good.It's disgusting to read people on reddit justify yogg.
"To the majority of people who play or would be interested in watching HS highlights, they're into the single serving 30 second clips where a Yogg wins the game or when a single crazy turn pulls out a win. Seeing the nuance in something is always hard for large audiences.
Explaining this line of play to someone who spends an hour or two on the game a month to hit rank 20, they're not really going to understand it. Show them a cool Yogg, they're going to be like "Oh Hell yeah, that's sick, I'm gonna craft that Yogg card.""
People can get yogg clips anywhere, they don't have to be from a tournament. Just dumb people justifying dumb stuff.
I can excuse them for Yogg. It's a 10 mana card with a wild effect that could also be detrimental. Nearly impossible to play test properly.
But I can't excuse them for the stuff they put in Karazhan. Stuff like Barnes is just really obviously stupid.
I can excuse them for Yogg. It's a 10 mana card with a wild effect that could also be detrimental. Nearly impossible to play test properly.
But I can't excuse them for the stuff they put in Karazhan. Stuff like Barnes is just really obviously stupid.
I think it's a great example of how Hearthstone's dev team cares more about making money than making the game good.
I can excuse them for Yogg. It's a 10 mana card with a wild effect that could also be detrimental. Nearly impossible to play test properly.
But I can't excuse them for the stuff they put in Karazhan. Stuff like Barnes is just really obviously stupid.
The card has no downside and it can straight up win you the game. 4 mana 3/4 + 1/1 is good. Anything above that is beyond positive. A card like that shouldn't exist on turn 4.I don't see what's so bad about barnes.. it can summon a pretty good 1/1 minion like ragnaros, but it can also summon a pretty bad and useless minion.
the card is almost always used as a tempo play, a very good tempo play, but nothing more than than and you don't expect it to win a game like yogg.
You guys have not been playing the Hunters that pull out Highmanes and Spider Wolfs from Barnes?
Barnes is also just as game winning as Yogg, if you don't realize it by now then you need to play more games. It's about the same thing as Tuskar Totemic winning you a game off of a high roll.
You guys have not been playing the Hunters that pull out Highmanes and Spider Wolfs from Barnes?
Barnes is also just as game winning as Yogg, if you don't realize it by now then you need to play more games. It's about the same thing as Tuskar Totemic winning you a game off of a high roll.
I don't see how you get punished for playing Barnes on turn 4 especially if it pulls out Grandmother, Spider Wolf and Highmane.
Like do people not play Tuskar Totemic because you get "punished" when you get a hero power Totem? No because even if you get the hero power totem is still produces a body AND discounts your Thing from the Deep. Barnes pulling anything but a Houndmaster is still great because you are putting out a beast that usually does something (even if it's a random ping on the board) which means synergy with other stuff.
Man how is producing a 3/4 body and a Beast 1/1 that deathrattles into two 1/1 Beast a "mediocre" result? That's Kill Command and Houndmaster follow ups that people have to worry about because we are talking about 4 total bodies here. That's disgusting.