I simply want a good game. I like single player one protagonist action games with fantasy setting, and not going to whine just because it has Final Fantasy in the title. It's asinine.It's wild to me, people are casually ok with FF switching genres from being a menu driven party based JRPG, to a single character action game like god of war or devil may cry, and think, yeah man, this is great, this is the future.
It’s a long running series that has taken big risks and redefined itself constantly. If you just want a traditional 1990s JRPG with better graphics, there are countless other games (including even FF spin-offs) trying to replicate that “FF game I played when I was 12” feeling.The fact that people think "a story driven DMC/Bayo/GoW 50 hour long Game of Thrones Revenge Story focusing on just one character" somehow equates to this being a FF RPG boggles my mind. Are modern gaming tastes so bad now that people are ok with this? Why must every AAA game be in this format, or some open world? I like having a diversity of genres, and the traditional JRPG is it's own genre, and this game is anything but that.
After playing the demo this just seems like an evolution from FFXV. I don't see anything wrong with this direction.It's wild to me, people are casually ok with FF switching genres from being a menu driven party based JRPG, to a single character action game like god of war or devil may cry, and think, yeah man, this is great, this is the future.
It's wild to me, people are casually ok with FF switching genres from being a menu driven party based JRPG, to a single character action game like god of war or devil may cry, and think, yeah man, this is great, this is the future.
Not even slightly. And the "battle system" is a fairly sizeable chunk of a FF game. This is not an inconsequential difference. They went from a party based atb menu driven RPG series, to a single character action game like GoW. It's a different genre of game at that point. The cognitive dissonance on display by people saying this is an RPG, let alone a mainline FF style RPG is breathtaking.
After playing the demo this just seems like an evolution from FFXV. I don't see anything wrong with this direction.
Imagine wanting this to still be a turn based game like 20 years ago.
It's called evolving.
I could have lived with a FF7R approach, but instead they just simply went full GoW instead.It’s a long running series that has taken big risks and redefined itself constantly. If you just want a traditional 1990s JRPG with better graphics, there are countless other games (including even FF spin-offs) trying to replicate that “FF game I played when I was 12” feeling.
I for one am glad that there’s at least one ambitious, big budget JRPG series that’s not afraid to do it’s own thing instead of just giving fans more of what they’re asking for.
I’ve been a fan of the series since 1994 and I think this game looks fucking awesome. I loved the demo and I don’t give a single shit about it not being traditional. Time for you crybabies to begin the healing process and move on to the countless other games that pander to your tastes.
It’s a long running series that has taken big risks and redefined itself constantly. If you just want a traditional 1990s JRPG with better graphics, there are countless other games (including even FF spin-offs) trying to replicate that “FF game I played when I was 12” feeling.
Why are you comparing with Persona instead Pokemon? lolIt's wild to me how close minded some JRPG players like you are when it comes to changing battle systems.
In case you've been living under a rock, Action RPGs sell way way more than Turn Based RPGs, Witcher 3 has sold 50 Million, Elden Ring sold 20 million in a single year, Diablo IV has apparently sold at least 9 million and it came out this month, in comparison Persona 5 has sold 8 million+ in 7 years, it was a no brainer for SE to take the Action RPG route, it's the best choice for the franchise in the current market.
No JRPG peaks on its first hour. Speaking on their combat system.Have you played Xenoblade 3. That is an awesome combat system for me...and I think Developers can do something awesome if they put the work in, but this is obviously the direction they wanted to go in and it looks like its going to pay off.
Have you played Xenoblade 3. That is an awesome combat system for me...and I think Developers can do something awesome if they put the work in, but this is obviously the direction they wanted to go in and it looks like its going to pay off.
Oh so you already played the full game?Combat was boring but game was well done. It's final fantasy and I'm still mashing buttons until the late game, why not do something about that?
It’s a long running series that has taken big risks and redefined itself constantly. If you just want a traditional 1990s JRPG with better graphics, there are countless other games (including even FF spin-offs) trying to replicate that “FF game I played when I was 12” feeling.
I for one am glad that there’s at least one ambitious, big budget JRPG series that’s not afraid to do it’s own thing instead of just giving fans more of what they’re asking for.
I’ve been a fan of the series since 1994 and I think this game looks fucking awesome. I loved the demo and I don’t give a single shit about it not being traditional. Time for you crybabies to begin the healing process and move on to the countless other games that pander to your tastes.
The fact that people think "a story driven DMC/Bayo/GoW 50 hour long Game of Thrones Revenge Story focusing on just one character" somehow equates to this being a FF RPG boggles my mind. Are modern gaming tastes so bad now that people are ok with this? Why must every AAA game be in this format, or some open world? I like having a diversity of genres, and the traditional JRPG is it's own genre, and this game is anything but that.
Yeaaaah it's why I go back and play older games that are everything a JRPG should be. At a glance FFXVI looks like another one and done cinematic movie to me.The fact that people think "a story driven DMC/Bayo/GoW 50 hour long Game of Thrones Revenge Story focusing on just one character" somehow equates to this being a FF RPG boggles my mind. Are modern gaming tastes so bad now that people are ok with this? Why must every AAA game be in this format, or some open world? I like having a diversity of genres, and the traditional JRPG is it's own genre, and this game is anything but that.
Oh so you already played the full game?
I got the game early and I'm about 16 hours in and I can confirm the story is not focused on just one character. It's heavily focused on multiple characters.The fact that people think "a story driven DMC/Bayo/GoW 50 hour long Game of Thrones Revenge Story focusing on just one character" somehow equates to this being a FF RPG boggles my mind. Are modern gaming tastes so bad now that people are ok with this? Why must every AAA game be in this format, or some open world? I like having a diversity of genres, and the traditional JRPG is it's own genre, and this game is anything but that.
Can't people accept that Final Fantasy is kind of anthology of games with different characters, settings and gameplay styles (including MMORPG!) and some themes and common elements to tie them together.
Did you play both demos?I played 3 hours, and based on the pacing, combat will be fleshed out by hour 17 and interesting at hour 30.
It's not an oversight anymore, its every AAA game they make.
What a weird argument, God forbid people decide what to be excited about or what to buy.No. This Billion Dollar company should cater to why I believe a JRPG should be, or else I personally won't be excited and may buy at a deep discount. I asked my Mom's opinion and she agrees.
There is a difference between “i am not excited for this. I will pass” and the endless parade of “this is fucking shit final fantasy is dead and i hope it fails” that we have been inundated with by people who made up their mind before the first trailer dropped.What a weird argument, God forbid people decide what to be excited about or what to buy.
After trying the demo I have no idea what people liked about it. I respect it but I really don’t understand it at all.
I paid 100€ and will also buy Physical for 90€.80 euros.. thankfully game sharing is a thing.
You won't regret.I am so close to buying this 670$ machine ONLY to play this game and they think FF16 is anything to worry about.
Would be amazing to see once sales tops the chart.
I see the weird hyperbole is still going on, sorry I stopped following the threads about this game, there were too many of them.There is a difference between “i am not excited for this. I will pass” and the endless parade of “this is fucking shit final fantasy is dead and i hope it fails” that we have been inundated with by people who made up their mind before the first trailer dropped.
It isn’t hyperbole. It is having a basic working memory and confirming it with users post histories.I see the weird hyperbole is still going on, sorry I stopped following the threads about this game, there were too many of them.
Anyway it seems some people like it so good for SE.
Why are you comparing with Persona instead Pokemon? lol
If you only speak about sales, why the last Yakuza is the best sold? They were from action in real time to turn based.
I mean, you simply are comparing super AAA with modest JRPG games. Persona 5 is not a $100 game, probably is like 5 or 6x less.
It's wild to me how close minded some JRPG players like you are when it comes to changing battle systems.
In case you've been living under a rock, Action RPGs sell way way more than Turn Based RPGs, Witcher 3 has sold 50 Million, Elden Ring sold 20 million in a single year, Diablo IV has apparently sold at least 9 million and it came out this month, in comparison Persona 5 has sold 8 million+ in 7 years, it was a no brainer for SE to take the Action RPG route, it's the best choice for the franchise in the current market.
I got the game early and I'm about 16 hours in and I can confirm the story is not focused on just one character. It's heavily focused on multiple characters.
Can you really compare the two? FF was created around turn based combat, the others, were not.
Because they assembled the right team to make this type of game. They went all out on it, fully dedicated the production to achieve its vision.
It’s ok to want something else, that happens with every FF release because they are all different one way or another. But I can tell some of the people who wanted something entirely different hoped SE would half ass it like they do too often, and can’t help themselves but be bitter about the fact that SE didn’t half ass it one bit.
Like a demo of it, actually. Game seriously lacks content atm.remove the gacha shit from honkai star rail and it is a modern big budget turn based RPG
1. A story driven DMC-like JRPG was a thing for like forever.The fact that people think "a story driven DMC/Bayo/GoW 50 hour long Game of Thrones Revenge Story focusing on just one character" somehow equates to this being a FF RPG boggles my mind. Are modern gaming tastes so bad now that people are ok with this? Why must every AAA game be in this format, or some open world? I like having a diversity of genres, and the traditional JRPG is it's own genre, and this game is anything but that.
Pokemon is uncomparable to most JRPGs, it's a franchise that has almost a monopoly on it's subgenre, and nobody is really trying to dethrone it, Pokemon Arceus was actually praised for finally changing the turn based combat and adding some action rpg mechanics in the mix btw.
I love these things, looks amazing!
Nautilus in shamblesJapan
Final Fantasy XVI (COMG!) - nichebarrier.com
Final Fantasy XVI (PS5) by Square Enix. Fact sheet, daily pre-orders, weekly sales at COMG! stores and similar games.nichebarrier.com
I love turn based combat but if I'm gonna play turn based RPG then I rather play Octopath, DQ and Persona/SMT instead of F2P gacha game, in fact for next year I'm super hyped for Metaphor and Persona 3 Reload.Like a demo of it, actually. Game seriously lacks content atm.
Nautilus in shambles
I don’t even see it as finding what’s “optimal”, I think they’re just experimenting with new ideas that they think would make for a fun and challenging game with interesting gameplay and character growth. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 all play very differently from each other and have totally different styles. And I’m expecting 17 will do a lot of things differently from 16.1. A story driven DMC-like JRPG was a thing for like forever.
2. FF changed a lot over a course of years. And FF went to "less party and turn-based, more action" for 20 years already. And it's not a bad thing - series move forward and try to figure what is optimal for JRPG with truly *mass-market* appeal. FF RPG is a mass market, most popular, most sold JRPG and it tries to maintain this image/status - this means that it should cater to what a modern era people want to play, not stick to traditions. If you don't like it - there are quite a lot more traditional JRPG to play.