James Sawyer Ford
Member
He's not Mrmattyplays, Gene Park already confirmed it:
Good to know. I knew something didn’t seem right
Absolutely bizarre behavior.
He's not Mrmattyplays, Gene Park already confirmed it:
Nah mate I stopped liking what PlayStation did the PS4 generation, even though I would have one of the largest physical Sony collections on here. You know what I did? Just stopped posting in Sony game threads. I could be letting rip roar in NDs newest woke walking simulator that looks 10 times worse then this but there’s no need, I’m never going to play their games again.
See if you can abstain and stop posting in Xbox game threads for something you’ll never even boot up and I’ll donate $100 to the charity of your choice in 12 months time.
$100 for the kids, can you do that? (That applies for you demigod too but I like your free reaction score points)
@EviLore is this enforceable?
Maybe it is him and he doesn't want it known. Mods are just maintaining his privacy in any case though, which is understandable.What should be enforceable is him previously implying that he's mrmattyplays for so long.
Maybe it is him and he doesn't want it known. Mods are just maintaining his privacy in any case though, which is understandable.
Wait what's going on here?Good to know. I knew something didn’t seem right
Absolutely bizarre behavior.
Release your game on a subcription service at 13.95 for 30 days or whatever it is. Then release the full game at normal price point of $60-$70. What did people expect? seriously? of course the CCU is low, because most smart people are either waiting for the PS5 version or rented the game for a month at 1/4 the price on game pass. Worst case is Indy is done and for old timers like me. Single player game with little replay value, why are people shocked other than doom and gloom and trolling. Try harder, nothing to see here.
The game released on Game Pass and on Steam simultaneously. Other games have done fine with Game Pass and Steam, but not necessarily single player games like Indy. No replay value, as you say, is probably a big reason why.
Either way, I'm not seeing people being shocked by this.
Doesn't look like this weekend is going to improve on last weekend. Bit of an ouch....
The game released on Game Pass and on Steam simultaneously. Other games have done fine with Game Pass and Steam, but not necessarily single player games like Indy. No replay value, as you say, is probably a big reason why.
Either way, I'm not seeing people being shocked by this.
I wouldve been more interested if this was the same type of game but a new IP. Indy is boring to me.
Single player is a bs excuse considering Sony 2 year old ports do better than this.
Single player is a bs excuse considering Sony 2 year old ports do better than this.
Didnt hurt Stalker. I just dont think the Indiana Jones IP is all that appealing to people under 40 years old who make up the bulk of players.
Did somebody hack Matty's GAF account? This is not the same dude I watch on LSM's Defining Duke podcast.
I refuse to believe this is the real Matty! Hell nah!
There’s no way it is.
Maybe he identifies as mrmatty. I don’t see anyone having problem with you topher.It isn't
Maybe he identifies as mrmatty. I don’t see anyone having problem with you topher.
Yeah, I think this is it. With Star Wars Outlaws, I've said before that I think the Star Wars brand is so tarnished that it keeps more people away than it attracts now. There's simply so much bad Star Wars that it's really unenticing when its logo is put on something. Although the last two Indiana Jones movies kinda sucked, I think what we're seeing here is different. The series is just past its heyday that it doesn't hold a huge amount of pull with younger audiences anymore. Remember, we may associate Indiana Jones with the 80s because that's when it was released, but it's actually set in the 1930s. For an 18 year old today, they don't see 80s nostalgia fun - they just see a kinda slow early WW2 game where you punch baddies. I said pre-launch that I was wasn't feeling this game, and I think it's because they just didn't know how to sell it. After some time with it, it's really the spiritual successor to Riddick I didn't know I wanted and I'm really enjoying my time with it. I hope it does well overall, but it's clear this is going to be a niche title. I imagine it'll end up like New Vegas; we'll all consider it a classic 10 years from now.Didnt hurt Stalker. I just dont think the Indiana Jones IP is all that appealing to people under 40 years old who make up the bulk of players.
oh that's weird, i thought it was just a "vocal minority" that said, from the outset, that making a first-person Indiana Jones game was fucking retarded
People over 40 weren't interested eitherDidnt hurt Stalker. I just dont think the Indiana Jones IP is all that appealing to people under 40 years old who make up the bulk of players.
Stalker is an old time classic PC IP. There was always going to be a lot of 'steam or bust' people willing to buy it outright.Didnt hurt Stalker. I just dont think the Indiana Jones IP is all that appealing to people under 40 years old who make up the bulk of players.
All true, which is why I am glad that MS still keep pumping money into gaming, because there is no way this game exists without it.The game could have done much better with a simultaneous launch, i.e., no "early access upgrade", PS5 day one, etc.
A 3rd person Indy game would likely have performed better as well, commercially speaking.
Lastly, can't help but think that the action-adventure audience is primarily on PlayStation. Even PC doesn't have that audience as much as PlayStation has. And the game could have benefited a lot if PlayStation marketed this game, instead of Xbox.
?? this game was in development before MS bought zenimax.All true, which is why I am glad that MS still keep pumping money into gaming, because there is no way this game exists without it.
As SlimySnake pointed out, this game was a result of a private deal b/w Zenimax and Disney. MS had no option but to continue with it or pay the penalty of cancelation.All true, which is why I am glad that MS still keep pumping money into gaming, because there is no way this game exists without it.
What I mean is I doubt it releases as an FPS imsim lite. More likely it ends up as third person much more scripted game with a bigger focus on guns and big set pieces and less on walking around the vatican.?? this game was in development before MS bought zenimax.
This is why sales matter.We've seen them shutter down Arkane and Tango previously, despite assurances otherwise, for similar reasons.
They don't actually care about the developers, studios, or games. Once you understand this, nothing will surprise youThis is why sales matter.
It always surprises me when some people get butthurt when you point that out.
He's not Mrmattyplays, Gene Park already confirmed it:
It's like most people are playing on Game Pass or something.Doesn't look like this weekend is going to improve on last weekend. Bit of an ouch....
They don't actually care about the developers, studios, or games. Once you understand this, nothing will surprise you
So, is that why Xbox is releasing it's games on Playstation out of necessity?That genre appeals to most PlayStation users because most of them are casuals and most of them eat up lowest common denominator shit so it's to be expected.
So, is that why Xbox is releasing it's games on Playstation out of necessity?
It's such a weird choice.This is exactly my thought. The brand was just alright to begin with but the last two movies lowered the enthusiasm.
It was an old IP that never was going to move any needles. Why anyone tried to hype it up like it was going to do gangbusters was beyond me and felt like console warring bullshit.
You do realize you've been capping hard for this game, which falls into the action/adventure genre right?That genre appeals to most PlayStation users because most of them are casuals and most of them eat up lowest common denominator shit so it's to be expected.
It's a first person puzzle 1930s exploration simulator in the theme of Indiana Jones.You do realize you've been capping hard for this game, which falls into the action/adventure genre right?
Calling it 'lowest common denominator' and 'for casuals' makes the game look worse, not better.
The standards of ambassador shills has seriously fallen and Microsoft really needs to crack the whip there.
Stop it!It's like most people are playing on Game Pass or something.
Steam CCUs doesn't work for Xbox first party games, sorry Freegunners.
Why does there have to be an increase in game pass numbers in order for people to play a game...... is every game supposed to see a CoD spike in player numbers in order for YOU to say people or playing it?Stop it!
You can't use the Gamepass excuse over & over right behind one another without showing the increase in Gamepass subscribers .
Basically if Indiana Johns is being played off of the increased subs from Call of Duty Black Ops 6 without increasing the subscription itself the game basically didn't bring any value yet.
I just dont think the Indiana Jones IP is all that appealing to people under 40 years old who make up the bulk of players.
Aka Action/Adventure.It's a first person puzzle 1930s exploration simulator in the theme of Indiana Jones.