The 360 launch wasn't bad, it was the utter wasteland between launch and it's second holiday season that sucked.
Oblivion alone probably kept a lot of people occupied until Gears of War hit.
The 360 launch wasn't bad, it was the utter wasteland between launch and it's second holiday season that sucked.
-Xbox Store might contain a lot of easily portable titles between xbox/w8/phone
So you think the Kotaku rumor is definitely referring to WinRT then? Yes.
Would Windows RT (the OS) even be feasible given what we know about the Durango hardware? Maybe with some weird abstraction layer or something.
WindowsRT is basically a more locked down version of Windows, with some APIs not exposed. There would be no reason for running it (imo), and more to lose by doing so. They would be better off (assuming they have the development assets that I believe they have) doing a WINPHONE-esque customization to the actual UI. not saying that it should look like winphone, but be its own tailored experience specifically geared towards games and media consumption. Like what the 360 is now, and what my vision of what BigPictureMode is (never used it). But of course exposing a lot more functionality, features, and badassery.
And this is what people were worried about when win8 launched.
That is, a situation wherein big game titles, both 1st and 3rd party, will release only through the windows app store and require winRT. It will mean more money for ms and more control over the software for the developers.
It will also mean higher prices and much less retail competition in the PC space and the end of win7 as a decent gaming platform.
lolwat
Very interesting Stephen. I thought the 360 had an absolutely stellar launch. Just on day 1 I purchased NFS: Most Wanted and Call of Duty 2.
About a week later I got Kameo, Perfect Dark Zero, PGR3, and Condemned. That's not even including a couple other good games at launch. I don't think the Wii U launch is typical one bit.
Man, it is bleak as hell in this thread. Does Durango even exist?
The bird has been proved legit...many times.
He only missed the 8gb thinghy, even asking for an autoban when proved wrong.
Microsoft Durango: Does it even exist?
Decent tagline.
Vita had a good launch, imo.
Many times? I have asked and been giving one thing that I could verify and that was the esram speed and that will not be proven until MS releases specs. So how has he been proven legit?
History of his post are few clicks away.
Yes it is, the burden of proof is always on the one trying to dispute the evidence. He is simply putting out info out there and it's up to people here to believe him or not but if you want to say he's lying you have to show us some proof.The burden of proof is not on me.
Man, it is bleak as hell in this thread. Does Durango even exist?
I have to say the 2012 720 release claim is odd considering they released Halo 4 on the 360 that holiday season. It seems possible, but unlikely to me.
People are paid to post shit on forums? Where do I sign up?.....
Like the other members of the team, he posed as a disinterested member of the public. Or, to be more accurate, as a crowd of disinterested members of the public: he used 70 personas, both to avoid detection and to create the impression that there was widespread support for his pro-corporate arguments...
Emails obtained by political hackers from a US cyber-security firm suggest that a remarkable technological armoury is being deployed.
- companies now use “persona management software”, which multiplies the efforts of the astroturfers working for them,
- this software creates all the online furniture a real person would possess: a name, email accounts, web pages and social media.
- fake accounts can be kept updated by automatically re-posting or linking to content generated elsewhere, reinforcing the impression that the account holders are real and active.
- human astroturfers can then be assigned these “pre-aged” accounts to create a back story,
But perhaps the most disturbing revelation is this. The US Air Force has been tendering for companies to supply it with persona management software, which will perform the following tasks:
- . Create “10 personas per user, replete with background, history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographically consistent. … Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms.”
- Automatically provide its astroturfers with “randomly selected IP addresses through which they can access the internet.” [An IP address is the number which identifies someone's computer]. These are to be changed every day, “hiding the existence of the operation.” The software should also mix up the astroturfers’ web traffic with “traffic from multitudes of users from outside the organization. This traffic blending provides excellent cover and powerful deniability
- . Create “static IP addresses” for each persona, enabling different astroturfers “to look like the same person over time.” It should also allow “organizations that frequent same site/service often to easily switch IP addresses to look like ordinary users as opposed to one organization.”
The burden of proof is not on me.
that's pretty sad for anyone involved in that. Also the accusations you make are saddeninghttp://topbestlisted.blogspot.com/2011/08/top-10-best-paid-forum-posting-jobs-on.html
expect to make $3-$5/hour.
If you want to whore yourself for companies like MS etc, you need to work for a large PR firm with ironclad guards against any astroturfing accusations being able to stick against the client. You might want to shoot off a resume to Bivings Group or similar.
further reading: http://www.monbiot.com/2011/02/23/robot-wars/
EDIT: check out this thread for some good role models: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=552004
Pretty sure he got PS4's RAM speed correct as well (when we were all assuming 192).Here is what I remember about his claims:
1. He got Durango's RAM speeds correct
2. He was the first one to claim Sony's RAM was upgraded to 4 GB, which was correct.
3. He got PS4's box dimensions hilariously wrong. I guess technically they could be right as we don't know the actual dimensions but the dimensions he claimed were just straight up ridiculous
4. Claimed 8 GB was impossible.
There were other rumors he had, but I don't remember them. Maybe the ones I'm forgetting improve his rumor track record, but from what I recall he hasn't been super reliable.
Yes it is, the burden of proof is always on the one trying to dispute the evidence. He is simply putting out info out there and it's up to people here to believe him or not but if you want to say he's lying you have to show us some proof.
Here is what I remember about his claims:
1. He got Durango's RAM speeds correct
2. He was the first one to claim Sony's RAM was upgraded to 4 GB, which was correct.
3. He got PS4's box dimensions hilariously wrong. I guess technically they could be right as we don't know the actual dimensions but the dimensions he claimed were just straight up ridiculous
4. Claimed 8 GB was impossible.
There were other rumors he had, but I don't remember them. Maybe the ones I'm forgetting improve his rumor track record, but from what I recall he hasn't been super reliable.
And you were told to check the posting history, I don't see why it's someone's job to find the quotes so you can think he is legit.If a person claims something then the burden is on that person to supply some support for that claim, some evidence that others can examine before accepting it.
Pretty sure he got PS4's RAM speed correct as well (when we were all assuming 192).
If a person claims something then the burden is on that person to supply some support for that claim, some evidence that others can examine before accepting it.
This is simply not possible. Some people have a good track record with these kinds of things, and it's their reputation you use to judge their merits. Asking for insiders to post evidence about or from their sources is a silly notion that simply wouldn't ever happen.
And yea, I'll vouch for Thuway. No insider is going to be correct all the time since even developers only know so much, but he's been right the majority of the time. I have actually been privy to some of his insider stuff and it's legit.
There are people reading this thread right now who have yet to say a damn thing and know I am telling the truth. I am not arguing the road map, I am intentionally telling you that Durango at ONE point in time was scheduled for a 2012 release to usurp Sony and go head to head with the Wii U. Don't believe me if you don't want. Thanks.
slider said:The way I've always taken insiders is as nothing more than mouthpieces. They'll be used to disemminate information
I think BruceLeeRoy was the one who gave us that and he (Thuway) verified the info?
Why did they even close studios like Bizzare? They really need to secure more first party studios, as we can see from Sony, third party exclusives have unreliable platform allegiances at best.
This is simply not possible. Some people have a good track record with these kinds of things, and it's their reputation you use to judge their merits. Asking for insiders to post evidence about or from their sources is a silly notion that simply wouldn't ever happen.
And yea, I'll vouch for Thuway. No insider is going to be correct all the time since even developers only know so much, but he's been right the majority of the time. I have actually been privy to some of his insider stuff and it's legit.
Gesh, some context. The key here is the FCC 2010 mandate for RVU to be offered by cable companies Dec 2012 till TiVo sued the FCC and now it's been put back to June 2014. The 4/2010 document mentions getting a Xbox 361 on the market by Dec 2012 to support XTV. So you are likely correct that by 4/2010 Microsoft had given up plans to launch in 2012 but at one point it's likely they planned for 2012.It's easy to question your claims when the goddamn official source contradict exactly what you're saying. Are you suggesting the leaked roadmap is wrong? That MS intentionally aimed to mislead by claiming a 2013 release when they were aiming for 2012?
What makes me question you further is that if they were indeed aiming for a 2012 release, why in the hell are they struggling at the moment? All signs point to a 2013 release, regardless of what one game intended to aim for.
Such BS. Either you're lying or your sources are shit.
They can even do it reality TV style if they wanted to; imagine if we were able to follow the Durango development process from day one, with all the ups and downs, via blog or tv.
The 360 launch wasn't bad, it was the utter wasteland between launch and it's second holiday season that sucked.
Plus weird, unpolished side-stuff like Ninety Nine Nights, Kameo, Chromehounds, Culdecept Saga, Earth Defense Force, Phantasy Star Universe, Project Sylpheed, Rockstar Table Tennis and Test Drive Unlimited, among others, that appealed depending on your taste.
Yes, I looked at a list.
Do you mean Ensemble?
Because mother fucker I am still mad about MS killing Ensemble.
Ghost Recon AW, Oblivion, PGR3, Dead or Alive 4, Call of Duty 2, Dead Rising, Fear, Hitman Blood Money, Battlefield 2, Burnout Revenge, Condemned Origins, Lost Planet, Prey, Saints Row, LotR: Battle for Middle Earth and Rainbow Six Vegas seem like a reasonable release schedule leading into Gears of War, Halo 3, Viva Pinata and many others that started off the "boom" of games after the launch year.
Plus weird, unpolished side-stuff like Ninety Nine Nights, Kameo, Chromehounds, Culdecept Saga, Earth Defense Force, Phantasy Star Universe, Project Sylpheed, Rockstar Table Tennis and Test Drive Unlimited, among others, that appealed depending on your taste.
Yes, I looked at a list.
EDIT: check out this thread for some good role models: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=552004
It really doesn't. This isn't the 90s and 'specs' don't sell anymore.Durango needs to spread hype by saying it has something that sounds cool yet technical (i.e. 8 GB DDRAM)
Durango needs to spread hype by saying it has something that sounds cool yet technical (i.e. 8 GB DDRAM)
http://topbestlisted.blogspot.com/2011/08/top-10-best-paid-forum-posting-jobs-on.html
expect to make $3-$5/hour.
If you want to whore yourself for companies like MS etc, you need to work for a large PR firm with ironclad guards against any astroturfing accusations being able to stick against the client. You might want to shoot off a resume to Bivings Group or similar.
further reading: http://www.monbiot.com/2011/02/23/robot-wars/
EDIT: check out this thread for some good role models: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=552004
There is a famous poster on Beyond3D named Bkilian. He was the audio engineer on Durango, and he is one of the biggest sources for all of this information. He no longer works at Microsoft, but during a private message session with a particular GAF member, he mentioned that he is frustrated that "the suits began caring only about profit". On his way out he was terribly frustrated with the design and goals of the machine. Karak eat your heart out.
As far as I know the current Durango was always planned for 2013. There was no one year delay.
They might have targeted 2012, but that would be before any real work was done on the system.
This is terribly disappointing to hear. I might be a PS owner by the end of this year then.
Interesting. So you are saying pretty confidently that it wasn't due to issues that they are releasing this year?
It's what I suspected for a while, I'm trying to get excited for this reveal but stern caution overshadows. Would be nice to be pleasantly surprised on the 21st though
Microsoft Durango: Does it even exist?
Decent tagline.