• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NBA Finals 2016 |OT| - The King demands seconds. The Chef delivers.

Status
Not open for further replies.

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.

The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.

The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).

This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.

Alright, let's get this out of the way early so this thread doesn't get worse before the games actually start.

Let's knock it off with the nonsensical hot take trolling analysis stuff. It's not constructive, is the worst semblance of "trash talk," it irritates pretty much everyone. and prevents genuine analysis and discussion from getting off the ground.

Trash talking is fine - but let's at least base it in some semblance of what's actually happening. Not random bullshit.
 
I'm honestly flabbergasted by any analysis that has Lebron/Kyrie putting up bigger numbers than Durant/Westbrook last series.

Westbrook is a far, far better player than Kyrie on both ends of the floor. And Durant isn't the playmaker Lebron is, but he's a much better shooter.

It will be very difficult for the Cavs to lean on them as much as OKC did, especially if Kerr cuts the bs and starts Iggy over Barnes from the jump.

Edit: no this guy did not put James Jones in a bench list wars. In terms of raw points and differential, Cleveland has one of the worst benches in the league.


http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/teamstats/16/7/diffeff/1-1
 

hbkdx12

Member
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.

The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.

The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).

This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.

I was going to respond to your whole dismissal of the WCF in your last post but after this post i'm confident your whole position is nothing but bait.
 

XiaNaphryz

LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
I was going to respond to your whole dismissal of the WCF in your last post but after this post i'm confident your whole position is nothing but bait.

I already gave a general warning above. Anyone who disregards it moving forward, they can't say they weren't warned ahead of time. :p
 
I'm honestly flabbergasted by any analysis that has Lebron/Kyrie putting up bigger numbers than Durant/Westbrook last series.

Westbrook is a far, far better player than Kyrie on both ends of the floor. And Durant isn't the playmaker Lebron is, but he's a much better shooter.

It will be very difficult for the Cavs to lean on them as much as OKC did, especially if Kerr cuts the bs and starts Iggy over Barnes from the jump.

Edit: no this guy did not put James Jones in a bench list wars. In terms of raw points and differential, Cleveland has one of the worst benches in the league.


http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/teamstats/16/7/diffeff/1-1
cavs have more options than okc.
 
they've added Jefferson and Frye, who, if you don't know, is the best 3 point shooter in the playoffs right now

giphy.gif


This just made my night, thank you.
 

Chichikov

Member
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.

The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.

The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).

This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.
For example, saying that the Cavs is a better coached team than Warriors is an opinion, I think it's a pretty crazy opinion, but again, you are entitled to it just as you're entitled to think that they play terrible basketball.
But saying that the don't have set plays is demonstrably false.
Honest question, do you know what set plays are?

p.s.
Wait, you're saying that Billy fucking Donovan should've won coach of the year?
Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaan, I might have to reconsider my stance on the whole entitled to have an opinion thing.
 
cavs have more options than okc.

Offensively? Sure. Defensively they are not on the same level. Tristian Thompson is a good rebounder but he's no where near as laterally agile or athletic as Steven Adams, which was key. Westbrook was very physical defensively with Curry in the first few games, which clearly had an effect on Steph and wore him down. Kyrie, on the other hand, well calling him a point guard is almost unfair as it implies he knows how to guard. Love? Another okay rebounder, but play him at the 5 and he's again no match for Adams as a defender or rim protector. As a 4? Again, can't come anywhere close to mimicking what Durant did defensively against GS, which was brilliant. OKC had 3 above average rim defenders they could throw in the game at any time, Ibaka, KD and Adams. Cleveland has zero. Golden State's struggles last series came almost entirely from what OKC did defensively.
 
So much crow will be eaten in this thread, the bird might go extinct.


Cavs don't stand a chance?

Let me remind you, this Golden State team just struggled against the Thunder-- a team that habitually gives up 4th quater leads, turns the ball over at an absurd clip, has two chuckers that cannot close out close games and choke over and over.

This Cavs team took the Warriors to 6 games with only LeBron at the helm. Now Kyrie and Love are healthy, they've added Jefferson and Frye, who, if you don't know, is the best 3 point shooter in the playoffs right now and are playing their best basketball, with not to mention the best player in the world hungry to bring his hometown a championship for the first time in over 50 years.

I would honestly be surprised if Golden State wins 2 games.

Cavs are the better team, and are better coached. They have a far more deadly bench (Frye, Shumpert, Jefferson, Dellevadova, Mo Williams, James Jones) and are better top to bottom.

This is going no more than 6 games, Cavs. That is, unless the refs and NBA artificially drag this series out.

I can't tell if this is a joke post or not. What got me is the Better coached and more deadly bench mentioning mo Williams and James Jones. Lmao.
 

SmokeMaxX

Member
The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
It's not terrible fundamentals if you have Klay Thompson and Steph Curry lol. Do you also think it's terrible to intentionally foul and put ~50% FT shooters on the line when you're almost definitely giving up a point per possession?
 
It's not terrible fundamentals if you have Klay Thompson and Steph Curry lol. Do you also think it's terrible to intentionally foul and put ~50% FT shooters on the line when you're almost definitely giving up a point per possession?
Eh, I mean yeah I have to admit that when you have those guys then it's hard not to let it fly, but most of us are human.

Heck, back in college, I was an above average 3pt shooter but if I took those shots they took, I'd be benched almost immediately. A lot of the fans of GS are younger, so I don't think constant pulling from 3, even when guarded teaches them good fundamentals.

About the freethrow thing, I have mixed feelings. One could say they shouldn't allow it because it slows the pace but then again, learn how to shoot freethrows and we don't have that issue.
 
I'm honestly flabbergasted by any analysis that has Lebron/Kyrie putting up bigger numbers than Durant/Westbrook last series.

Westbrook is a far, far better player than Kyrie on both ends of the floor. And Durant isn't the playmaker Lebron is, but he's a much better shooter.

It will be very difficult for the Cavs to lean on them as much as OKC did, especially if Kerr cuts the bs and starts Iggy over Barnes from the jump.

Edit: no this guy did not put James Jones in a bench list wars. In terms of raw points and differential, Cleveland has one of the worst benches in the league.


http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/teamstats/16/7/diffeff/1-1

The game requires/feeds itself of more things than just scoring.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/NBA_2016_leaders.html
 

vern

Member
Eh, I mean yeah I have to admit that when you have those guys then it's hard not to let it fly, but most of us are human.

Heck, back in college, I was an above average 3pt shooter but if I took those shots they took, I'd be benched almost immediately. A lot of the fans of GS are younger, so I don't think constant pulling from 3, even when guarded teaches them good fundamentals.

About the freethrow thing, I have mixed feelings. One could say they shouldn't allow it because it slows the pace but then again, learn how to shoot freethrows and we don't have that issue.

There is a pretty big difference between an above average 3 pt shooter in college and Steph Curry.
 
There is a pretty big difference between an above average 3 pt shooter in college and Steph Curry.


No I totally agree and that is my point... if not even an above average shooter could/should do it, don't you think that sends the wrong message to the kids that are watching?

I've seen the fruits of people thinking they're Curry.

It ain't pretty... lol
 

beat

Member
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.

The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.

Passing to the open man isn't a game plan breakdown. That's... a play. (By the way, "even with a man in your face" contradicts "the open man".)

There's a lot more information about Warriors plays at Golden State of Mind, in reverse-chronological order:

Obviously Klay and Steph are their first and second options, but their plays are designed with multiple options depending on what the defense gives them. They're a well-coached team. The difference between them and most well-coached teams is that, yes, when their plays do completely break down, Steph makes contested threes as reliably as regular shooters do when wide open. A possession that ends with a tightly contested Steph three has an expected point value of 1.26 points. That's incredible! The greatest NBA team offense of all time averaged 1.156 points per possession.
 
lol@ junior concern trolling Curry's 3pt shot.

Not even. Curry is the greatest shooter ever, and Klay isn't too far behind. Like I said above, those guys aren't human haha

I'm just saying that we are, and no matter how you slice it, it's not fundamentally sound to play that way. You live by the three, you die by the three, and they almost died, down 3-1.

Here we go again. Using percentages to prove a point.

1449025d7bb84930.gif


It's not just the percentages. Frye is significantly important to the Cavs, and is one of the league leaders in Win Shares per 48, the league leader in Offensive Rating, the leader in TS% (which is a far better metric than pure FG%), and yes, the league leader in 3P% at 60%, but at 4 attempts per game!

Those are not insignificant things and thus supports my claim that Frye is the best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now.

For reference, Curry and Klay are shooting 40% and 45%, respectively, both at 10 attepmts per game. Great numbers, but doesn't best Frye's. Also consider those guys are starters and Frye comes off the bench.

Dude has some ridiculous 3 pt streak going right now, like 47 out of 50 or something like that. Can't find it atm but perhaps someone better at stats fishing could do the honors.
 

kaiju

Member
Not even. Curry is the greatest shooter ever, and Klay isn't too far behind. Like I said above, those guys aren't human haha

I'm just saying that we are, and no matter how you slice it, it's not fundamentally sound to play that way. You live by the three, you die by the three, and they almost died, down 3-1.

Thank you for gracing us with your presence, Mr. Barkley.

I'm being serious here, you really sound like Chuck.
 

Jonm1010

Banned
To be honest I don't care for analytics. Analytics said the spurs should have at least been in the conference finals right? I know what I have seen and what is very true James I don't care to look up the numbers this playoffs leading up to the finals has played the least amount of minutes. That is HUGE!

Oh, you are one of those people huh?
 
People who "don't believe" in analytics or stats because they don't tell the future always seem to miss the point of analytics and statistics.
 
Thank you for gracing us with your presence, Mr. Barkley.

I'm being serious here, you really sound like Chuck.

I think he's closer to Mark Jackson. Steph and Klay are great shooters but they're ruining the game. That kid's a fighter..check out his pedigree...mom's a nurse, dad's a blue collar steel worker. Hustle and Heart..Hand down, man down...momma there goes that man again..

In all seriousness, I don't get why people are all of a sudden disrespecting OKC. They had a solid playoff run for the most part. I thought Donovan did a good job coaching. I feel like the Thunder have the players and just need a good offseason for everyone to really buy into what Donovan's doing. The defense is legit and if they start trusting each other to run plays during crunch time, that's a formidable contender for at least the next few seasons.
 
I think he's closer to Mark Jackson. Steph and Klay are great shooters but they're ruining the game. That kid's a fighter..check out his pedigree...mom's a nurse, dad's a blue collar steel worker. Hustle and Heart..Hand down, man down...momma there goes that man again..


I laughed entirely too hard at this...

Thanks for that.
 

Supast4r

Junior Member
Um lets start off with the fact that the best player in basketball (Yes he still is that) is WELL rested. LeBron James has fresh legs and along with that he doesn't have to shoulder the load. So yes love and Kyrie might have an off game but James can easily offset that with a (35-40 point night if needed. They have a very underrated bench and team in general. Fry can come in an give you 15 points if needed, Dellie can give you needed points,defense intensity and assist. Richard Jefferson bring scoring still athleticism and experience, and shumpert bring scoring, DEFENSE, and athleticism. Long story short this team is deep, very good and criminally underrated and undervalued. But the games have to be played and it is on them to prove who they are and can be collectively.
Says Lebron is the best player when Curry has won two back to back Mvps and broke the regular season record. Golden state in 5.
 
It's funny how Cavs fans don't believe in statistics. I wonder why that is...

Stats are important, but even from a statistical perspective, basketball is a make or miss league. When you calculate the expected points of a shot (given location, difficulty, and ability of the shooter) and compare that to the actual points scored, the difference varies randomly from one game to the next. There are too many intangible factors or plain old luck deciding if your shots get a friendly roll or go halfway down and pop out.

So in a small enough sample size (4 out of 7 games), the Cavs are potent enough offensively to win if they outperform their expected points per shot while the Warriors underperform. Which is a distinct possibility. Or it could go the other way in which case the Warriors would sweep the Finals. The one outcome I wouldn't expect would be Cavs in 4 or 5.

None of this discounts statistics, but acknowledges the high variability in basketball if the two teams are reasonably well matched. Warriors are the better team, but it's not a huge mismatch. Variance could tip the scales in the Cavs' favor.
 

vern

Member
No I totally agree and that is my point... if not even an above average shooter could/should do it, don't you think that sends the wrong message to the kids that are watching?

I've seen the fruits of people thinking they're Curry.

It ain't pretty... lol

Shitty players have been emulating superstars since well before curry... Jordan's circus layups and Kobe's fadeaways weren't good for kids watching either. Not sure I understand your point.
 
Somebody tell the players & ABC, there's no need to play the games cause we know who's winning already because of the past.

Stats favor the GSW handily. We understood that by page 1, the games need to be played and all those models would be put test while the result it's obtained. I remember last year that based on stats GSW was going to sweep, they were also beating OchoKeC in five games but ended up scraping by in 7 games, but I digress.

I accept stats cause they are an abstraction of the past facts and hold predictive value, games still need to be played.
 

Two Words

Member
Somebody tell the players & ABC, there's no need to play the games cause we know who's winning already because of the past.

Stats favor the GSW handily. We understood that by page 1, the games need to be played and all those models would be put test while the result it's obtained. I remember last year that based on stats GSW was going to sweep, they were also beating OchoKeC in five games but ended up scraping by in 7 games, but I digress.

I accept stats cause they are an abstraction of the past facts and hold predictive value, games still need to be played.
You're right, games do need to be played. Four games.
 
Not even. Curry is the greatest shooter ever, and Klay isn't too far behind. Like I said above, those guys aren't human haha

I'm just saying that we are, and no matter how you slice it, it's not fundamentally sound to play that way. You live by the three, you die by the three, and they almost died, down 3-1.




It's not just the percentages. Frye is significantly important to the Cavs, and is one of the league leaders in Win Shares per 48, the league leader in Offensive Rating, the leader in TS% (which is a far better metric than pure FG%), and yes, the league leader in 3P% at 60%, but at 4 attempts per game!

Those are not insignificant things and thus supports my claim that Frye is the best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now.

For reference, Curry and Klay are shooting 40% and 45%, respectively, both at 10 attepmts per game. Great numbers, but doesn't best Frye's. Also consider those guys are starters and Frye comes off the bench.

Dude has some ridiculous 3 pt streak going right now, like 47 out of 50 or something like that. Can't find it atm but perhaps someone better at stats fishing could do the honors.
He hasn't even taken 50 three pointers this postseason. He's 26 out of 45....which is great but if he was to take the same amount of threes as Klay and Steph that number would drop.

Also this live by the three die by the three, your basically talking about both teams. Cleveland is jacking up just as much threes as GSW.
 

Jindrax

Member
pfffff if it was OKC vs CAVS i'd put my money on bron bron...
But now as much as I want CAVS to win... I just know they're going to get rekt...

But I hope for Cavs in 7
 
It's not just the percentages. Frye is significantly important to the Cavs, and is one of the league leaders in Win Shares per 48, the league leader in Offensive Rating, the leader in TS% (which is a far better metric than pure FG%), and yes, the league leader in 3P% at 60%, but at 4 attempts per game!

Those are not insignificant things and thus supports my claim that Frye is the best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now.

Forget best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now, going by those stats Frye is by far the best offensive player in the whole playoffs. He has the highest 2P FG% as well. Clearly he should be put into the starting lineup and should be the focal point of the Cavs' offense.

Or he's on a hot streak and doing well in a very small sample size, and it would be a lot more reliable to consider overall career and season in evaluating what a player's true talent level is.
 
My cheering will go towards the Warriors. Screw Lebron.

However, I doubt I'll watch much, if any of it since the Raptors are out.
 

Servbot24

Banned
pfffff if it was OKC vs CAVS i'd put my money on bron bron...
But now as much as I want CAVS to win... I just know they're going to get rekt...

But I hope for Cavs in 7
The Cavs need to hope Klay and Curry are relatively cold, which could definitely happen. Curry has proven himself in clutch moments, but he needs to be there the entire game, not just for a quarter. If those two are on, and the rest of the team plays at least to their average, I think the series is GSW in 6. 6 at most.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom