Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.
The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).
This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.
The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).
This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.
Question of the day: if Curry wins 7 straight titles, is he the GOAT?
I was going to respond to your whole dismissal of the WCF in your last post but after this post i'm confident your whole position is nothing but bait.
cavs have more options than okc.I'm honestly flabbergasted by any analysis that has Lebron/Kyrie putting up bigger numbers than Durant/Westbrook last series.
Westbrook is a far, far better player than Kyrie on both ends of the floor. And Durant isn't the playmaker Lebron is, but he's a much better shooter.
It will be very difficult for the Cavs to lean on them as much as OKC did, especially if Kerr cuts the bs and starts Iggy over Barnes from the jump.
Edit: no this guy did not put James Jones in a bench list wars. In terms of raw points and differential, Cleveland has one of the worst benches in the league.
http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/teamstats/16/7/diffeff/1-1
they've added Jefferson and Frye, who, if you don't know, is the best 3 point shooter in the playoffs right now
cavs have more options than okc.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but they are not entitled to their own facts.Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.
The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
The Cavs on the other hand run set plays, make adjustments and play overall smoother basketball (except for when Kyrie goes into iso mode, which can last an entire quarter).
This boils down to the coaching. The Warriors had been winning because they're talented-- this is why Kerr could miss half a season and Walton could "coach" the team and they didn't miss a beat. It's a sham that he won CoTY when the Raptors coach or Thunder coach probably should have won. Yeah yeah, 73 wins. But that wasn't Kerr.
cavs have more options than okc.
So much crow will be eaten in this thread, the bird might go extinct.
Cavs don't stand a chance?
Let me remind you, this Golden State team just struggled against the Thunder-- a team that habitually gives up 4th quater leads, turns the ball over at an absurd clip, has two chuckers that cannot close out close games and choke over and over.
This Cavs team took the Warriors to 6 games with only LeBron at the helm. Now Kyrie and Love are healthy, they've added Jefferson and Frye, who, if you don't know, is the best 3 point shooter in the playoffs right now and are playing their best basketball, with not to mention the best player in the world hungry to bring his hometown a championship for the first time in over 50 years.
I would honestly be surprised if Golden State wins 2 games.
Cavs are the better team, and are better coached. They have a far more deadly bench (Frye, Shumpert, Jefferson, Dellevadova, Mo Williams, James Jones) and are better top to bottom.
This is going no more than 6 games, Cavs. That is, unless the refs and NBA artificially drag this series out.
It's not terrible fundamentals if you have Klay Thompson and Steph Curry lol. Do you also think it's terrible to intentionally foul and put ~50% FT shooters on the line when you're almost definitely giving up a point per possession?The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
Eh, I mean yeah I have to admit that when you have those guys then it's hard not to let it fly, but most of us are human.It's not terrible fundamentals if you have Klay Thompson and Steph Curry lol. Do you also think it's terrible to intentionally foul and put ~50% FT shooters on the line when you're almost definitely giving up a point per possession?
I'm honestly flabbergasted by any analysis that has Lebron/Kyrie putting up bigger numbers than Durant/Westbrook last series.
Westbrook is a far, far better player than Kyrie on both ends of the floor. And Durant isn't the playmaker Lebron is, but he's a much better shooter.
It will be very difficult for the Cavs to lean on them as much as OKC did, especially if Kerr cuts the bs and starts Iggy over Barnes from the jump.
Edit: no this guy did not put James Jones in a bench list wars. In terms of raw points and differential, Cleveland has one of the worst benches in the league.
http://www.hoopsstats.com/basketball/fantasy/nba/teamstats/16/7/diffeff/1-1
The game requires/feeds itself of more things than just scoring.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/playoffs/NBA_2016_leaders.html
Eh, I mean yeah I have to admit that when you have those guys then it's hard not to let it fly, but most of us are human.
Heck, back in college, I was an above average 3pt shooter but if I took those shots they took, I'd be benched almost immediately. A lot of the fans of GS are younger, so I don't think constant pulling from 3, even when guarded teaches them good fundamentals.
About the freethrow thing, I have mixed feelings. One could say they shouldn't allow it because it slows the pace but then again, learn how to shoot freethrows and we don't have that issue.
There is a pretty big difference between an above average 3 pt shooter in college and Steph Curry.
Thanks for posting this. Couldn't post because I'm on mobile.
Proves my point about Channing Frye.
Your incredulity makes me question if you've watched the Warriors or the Cavs this season with a critical eye.
The Warriors do not have set plays. Their literal game plan is to set as many screens as it takes for Curry to get free, and launch threes all game. When that breaks down, have whoever has the ball in their hands make a bail out play, or pass to the open man, and (you guessed it) launch threes, even with a man in your face. It's terrible basketball and teaches the younger generation poor fundamentals.
lol@ junior concern trolling Curry's 3pt shot.
Here we go again. Using percentages to prove a point.
![]()
Why? Cavs are one of the most emotionally unstable teamsThe biggest minus of OKC is their tendency to beat themselves. I don't think the Cavs will do that but they don't have the same strenghts of OKC. The Cavs ain't OKC but that goes for the good & the bad.
Not even. Curry is the greatest shooter ever, and Klay isn't too far behind. Like I said above, those guys aren't human haha
I'm just saying that we are, and no matter how you slice it, it's not fundamentally sound to play that way. You live by the three, you die by the three, and they almost died, down 3-1.
To be honest I don't care for analytics. Analytics said the spurs should have at least been in the conference finals right? I know what I have seen and what is very true James I don't care to look up the numbers this playoffs leading up to the finals has played the least amount of minutes. That is HUGE!
Thank you for gracing us with your presence, Mr. Barkley.
I'm being serious here, you really sound like Chuck.
Thank you for gracing us with your presence, Mr. Barkley.
I'm being serious here, you really sound like Chuck.
I think he's closer to Mark Jackson. Steph and Klay are great shooters but they're ruining the game. That kid's a fighter..check out his pedigree...mom's a nurse, dad's a blue collar steel worker. Hustle and Heart..Hand down, man down...momma there goes that man again..
Why? Cavs are one of the most emotionally unstable teams
Says Lebron is the best player when Curry has won two back to back Mvps and broke the regular season record. Golden state in 5.Um lets start off with the fact that the best player in basketball (Yes he still is that) is WELL rested. LeBron James has fresh legs and along with that he doesn't have to shoulder the load. So yes love and Kyrie might have an off game but James can easily offset that with a (35-40 point night if needed. They have a very underrated bench and team in general. Fry can come in an give you 15 points if needed, Dellie can give you needed points,defense intensity and assist. Richard Jefferson bring scoring still athleticism and experience, and shumpert bring scoring, DEFENSE, and athleticism. Long story short this team is deep, very good and criminally underrated and undervalued. But the games have to be played and it is on them to prove who they are and can be collectively.
It's funny how Cavs fans don't believe in statistics. I wonder why that is...
No I totally agree and that is my point... if not even an above average shooter could/should do it, don't you think that sends the wrong message to the kids that are watching?
I've seen the fruits of people thinking they're Curry.
It ain't pretty... lol
You're right, games do need to be played. Four games.Somebody tell the players & ABC, there's no need to play the games cause we know who's winning already because of the past.
Stats favor the GSW handily. We understood that by page 1, the games need to be played and all those models would be put test while the result it's obtained. I remember last year that based on stats GSW was going to sweep, they were also beating OchoKeC in five games but ended up scraping by in 7 games, but I digress.
I accept stats cause they are an abstraction of the past facts and hold predictive value, games still need to be played.
You're right, games do need to be played. Four games.
He hasn't even taken 50 three pointers this postseason. He's 26 out of 45....which is great but if he was to take the same amount of threes as Klay and Steph that number would drop.Not even. Curry is the greatest shooter ever, and Klay isn't too far behind. Like I said above, those guys aren't human haha
I'm just saying that we are, and no matter how you slice it, it's not fundamentally sound to play that way. You live by the three, you die by the three, and they almost died, down 3-1.
It's not just the percentages. Frye is significantly important to the Cavs, and is one of the league leaders in Win Shares per 48, the league leader in Offensive Rating, the leader in TS% (which is a far better metric than pure FG%), and yes, the league leader in 3P% at 60%, but at 4 attempts per game!
Those are not insignificant things and thus supports my claim that Frye is the best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now.
For reference, Curry and Klay are shooting 40% and 45%, respectively, both at 10 attepmts per game. Great numbers, but doesn't best Frye's. Also consider those guys are starters and Frye comes off the bench.
Dude has some ridiculous 3 pt streak going right now, like 47 out of 50 or something like that. Can't find it atm but perhaps someone better at stats fishing could do the honors.
It's not just the percentages. Frye is significantly important to the Cavs, and is one of the league leaders in Win Shares per 48, the league leader in Offensive Rating, the leader in TS% (which is a far better metric than pure FG%), and yes, the league leader in 3P% at 60%, but at 4 attempts per game!
Those are not insignificant things and thus supports my claim that Frye is the best 3P shooter in the playoffs right now.
The Cavs need to hope Klay and Curry are relatively cold, which could definitely happen. Curry has proven himself in clutch moments, but he needs to be there the entire game, not just for a quarter. If those two are on, and the rest of the team plays at least to their average, I think the series is GSW in 6. 6 at most.pfffff if it was OKC vs CAVS i'd put my money on bron bron...
But now as much as I want CAVS to win... I just know they're going to get rekt...
But I hope for Cavs in 7