#schubastard is catching on :lolJuicy Bob said:Rubens assembling his own private Twitter army.
derFeef said:Why do you even watch this? You obviously only get entertained by crashes, injuries and deaths (?).
Shaneus said:So how is Schumi attempting to run someone into a wall "entertainment"?
Just because F1 is shit doesn't mean drivers have to end up getting killed just because you can be entertained by it.avaya said:Keep on putting words in my mouth.
I used to watch it because it was a street fight on the track.
I watch it these days because of Ferrari and Mercedes.
How is watching two shitty V8 powered neutered F1 cars driving in a procession with the other clearly unable to get within 50metres of the other because of an illegal aerodynamic device which was slyly approved by a corrupt FIA president last year "entertainment"?
The only entrainment you get these days is when it rains. F1 is fucking shit these days. The cars are no longer as good as they could be because of the shit rules on testing, engines and budgets.
kikanny said:Just because F1 is shit doesn't mean drivers have to end up getting killed just because you can be entertained by it.
avaya said:The only entrainment you get these days is when it rains. F1 is fucking shit these days. The cars are no longer as good as they could be because of the shit rules on testing, engines and budgets.
Jinjo said:That's why multiple previous trackrecords have been smashed to bits this year. This is one of the fastest classes of F1 cars ever.
avaya said:Yeah that was great entertainment. Almost as good as watching paint dry.
Jinjo said:That's why multiple previous trackrecords have been smashed to bits this year. This is one of the fastest classes of F1 cars ever.
avaya said:The only entrainment you get these days is when it rains. F1 is fucking shit these days.
But current tracks would be unsuitable for such cars. F1 is also about turns and not pure speed. This is not Nascar.avaya said:Err that tends to happen with natural technological evoluation but what do you think would happen if they went to back to 2002 rules?
V10 1000bhp+, 21,000RPM+ engines, cars with 2-3x the aerodynamic efficiency, qualifying engines, chassis and parts. Cars on the VERY cutting edge. Since 2002 there has been a concerted effort to tone down how F1 has been approached and it is very much an endurance series these days instead of the pure sprint it was before.
Cars these days are neutered. You could be seeing lap records 4-5s/lap faster than what they're going now. Probably approaching 7g+ at peak cornering performance.
Spending $500m+/year will get you far more than spending a fifth of that.
avaya said:Err that tends to happen with natural technological evoluation but what do you think would happen if they went to back to 2002 rules?
V10 1000bhp+, 21,000RPM+ engines, cars with 2-3x the aerodynamic efficiency, qualifying engines, chassis and parts. Cars on the VERY cutting edge. Since 2002 there has been a concerted effort to tone down how F1 has been approached and it is very much an endurance series these days instead of the pure sprint it was before.
Cars these days are neutered. You could be seeing lap records 4-5s/lap faster than what they're going now. Probably approaching 7g+ at peak cornering performance.
Spending $500m+/year will get you far more than spending a fifth of that.
Caramello said:You know for all the stuff you seem to think happened in the 90's, Schumacher's antics (putting certain people into walls for example) gave him the reputation of being a dirty cheat.. He's always been one, it's not like his antics back then were 'normal' and I don't get why you think they were.
Btw, Senna was on the grass when he took out Prost at Suzuka in 1990, it's not like he didn't give him room. Certainly not the same as turning in one someone to put them into a wall.
Juicy Bob said:Really? I can't disagree more. This season has been hugely eventful. Outside of Bahrain and Hockenheim, every race has been entertaining at the very least with Australia, China, Turkey, Canada and Silverstone being truly awesome races.
derFeef said:But current tracks would be unsuitable for such cars. F1 is also about turns and not pure speed. This is not Nascar.
Caramello said:Btw, Senna was on the grass when he took out Prost at Suzuka in 1990, it's not like he didn't give him room. Certainly not the same as turning in one someone to put them into a wall.
avaya said:V10 1000bhp+, 21,000RPM+ engines, cars with 2-3x the aerodynamic efficiency, qualifying engines, chassis and parts. Cars on the VERY cutting edge. Since 2002 there has been a concerted effort to tone down how F1 has been approached and it is very much an endurance series these days instead of the pure sprint it was before.
Scipius said:Don't know if you were watching in the turbo era, but having wheelspin in 6th gear while going uphill is no one's idea of having fun. Cars were ridiculously overpowered in the early 1980s and most drivers were only too happy to go back to aspirated engines and reduced ground effect. Restrictions on technology have always been part of F1.
Another point is that the antics of Senna and Schumacher are only made possible because of the relatively high degree of survivability of modern cars and circuits. Up until the 1980s, such tactics were not regularly seen not because there were only gentleman drivers, but because having it go wrong could easily result in someone ending up dead.
Stop It said::lol :lol
http://twitter.com/MikeGascoyne <- (Btw I like following the smaller teams on twitter)
"Have to say michaels move against the williams was way to much, the stewards must act"
Fancy calling one of the most respected figures in F1 wrong avaya? Feel free to tweet him saying that you want to see "entertainment".
ExtraKr1spy said:Schumacher's been out of F1 for 3 years and people act surprised when he does what he did. He's done that before and we've seen other drivers do it. Webber did it a few years ago to Massa iirc. A few other drivers do it at the start.
iapetus said:I'm confused. Vettel was faster than Alonso - why didn't Alonso move aside and let him through?
Deadman said:Schumacher 10 place grid drop at spa.
Deadman said:Schumacher 10 place grid drop at spa.
Goldrusher said:Fair penalty.
But Barrichello should've gone to the left. Schumacher was clearly going to the right, yet for some reason, Barrichello thought he could squeeze himself in there. That was a weird and risky move. Watch his onboard footage.
:loliapetus said:I'm confused. Vettel was faster than Alonso - why didn't Alonso move aside and let him through?
iapetus said:I'm confused. Vettel was faster than Alonso - why didn't Alonso move aside and let him through?
You don't back off when there are only a handful of laps. If you are faster and are owning, the one getting owned need to man the fuck up and make way for the one up on his ass. Schumi is used to getting his ass kicked and losing positions this entire season but this one meant alot to him especially after the previous race evoked memories of the 2002 fuckup.magnificent83 said:Schumie was in vintage bastard form. Don't really think it was worth a ten drop penalty, since Barrichello could have backed off at any time :lol
Been saying this forever. At least, he acknowledged that it was his fault in the end this time. :lolchicko1983 said:man, I dislike Vettel, he acts like such a brat.
Lince said:the pace of the bulls was insane, well done Alonso fending off Vettel who was clearly a full second "faster than you". So glad Hamilton DNF and Button did so poorly, the championship gets more interesting now (as long as RBR don't show the out of this world pace again)
Massa "what position did Webber end?" :lol
poor lad isn't fully recovered or something, he's just too unaware.
FIA to ramp up wing tests for Belgium
The FIA has moved to try to bring an end to Formula 1's flexible front wing row by telling teams it will ramp up the deflection tests from the next race in Belgium, AUTOSPORT has learned.
In the wake of complaints from a number of teams about possible flexing of the front wings of the Red Bull Racing and Ferrari cars at high speed, even though nothing has been found to be wrong with the two machines, the FIA wrote to teams after the Hungarian Grand Prix on Sunday telling them it was going to attempt to clear up the matter.
AUTOSPORT understands that from the next event at Spa-Francorchamps, the FIA has activated Article 3.17.8 of F1's technical regulations, which allows it to increase load deflection tests at any point to prevent teams being able to run flexible wings.
Article 3.17.8 states: "In order to ensure that the requirements of Article 3.15 are respected, the FIA reserves the right to introduce further load/deflection tests on any part of the bodywork which appears to be (or is suspected of), moving whilst the car is in motion."
At the moment the endplates on the front wing are allowed to flex by a maximum of 10mm when a load of 50 kilogrammes (500 Newtons) is applied to them.
The FIA has told teams now that it reserves the right to increase that test up to 100 kilogrammes - and it will only allow a linear increase of deflection up to 20mm.
The linear increase is designed to ensure that teams are not using clever material design to ensure that their cars pass the deflection test to stay within the regulations but then flex much more at higher loads.
It is also understood that the FIA is to clamp down on teams using clever fixings and joints on the underfloor of the car amid suspicions that this is one area that teams could also be exploiting the regulations.
Massa said:How on earth is he supposed to know everyone's position on the track? The fact that Webber did 40 laps on soft tyres is incredible, and from Massa's point of view Rob was telling him to push it as Webber would pit before 20 laps.
God you're thick.
Steppenwolf said:I'm really pissed off that Vettel didn't win today. I start to think he's too inexperienced at this point to really fight for the title, tho he has good position after this race. That was really a beginners error and no shame about that, we have seen similar fuck ups by way bigger names, but it's just annoying.