Roger that, homeslice.jobber said:damn I missed you on IRC. I'm finishing a offline game...ummm meet me in the lobby around 10:15ish (est) which would be in 25 minutes in yahoo time -_-
I'm playing a classic game!
Roger that, homeslice.jobber said:damn I missed you on IRC. I'm finishing a offline game...ummm meet me in the lobby around 10:15ish (est) which would be in 25 minutes in yahoo time -_-
I'm playing a classic game!
Cerrius said:pheeniks, you wanna ball? I'm available.
Cerrius said:pheeniks, what happened? did your internet crap out again
I was winning too :-(
KG and Toine were taking care of business
pheeniks said:Not complaining---but are we allowed to control a player not defending the ballhandler? I saw that you did that, and I've wanted to do that sometimes, but I didn't know if it was allowed.
Fifty said:edit: above post. It's not IMPOSSIBLE to cover a ball handler at all. What is tricky is when they cut back and forth rapidly to get past you. There's no momentum in the game and, well, it can get pretty crazy. I've only encountered a few times when it wasn't in my best interest to play manual D. Now I've been playing legit players only..if I played someone who was trying to exploit stuff, then I might be complaining more. In the course of a legit game it's perfectly manageable to play manual all game
Fifty said:Fine, maybe my 'at all' was a mistake. I'm saying when I play legit gaffers, who play a realistic game and don't try to exploit driving past a manual defender every game, it's ok to play manual D. Personally I'd be pissed as hell if someone did try to drive past me every possession, and I wouldn't play them again..so I'm not talking about situations like that. I'm assuming league players wouldn't be relying on exploits.
:|jobber said:GAME OF THE YEAR!
even if I would've lost
Rorschach said::|
Turnover central!
I expected something more...slowly paced against the Spurs. Every pass was intercepted...
I cry...GG.
Rorschach said:btw- that glitch where you shoot the FT while my subs are still walking in sucks ass...automatic rebound for the shooter.
bluemax said:WTF is up with the TWolves owner? 38 3 Point attempts? Some weird man crush on Fatoine Walker (36 shots by him!)?
I know a I played like ass but what the hell!
bluemax said:WTF is up with the TWolves owner? 38 3 Point attempts? Some weird man crush on Fatoine Walker (36 shots by him!)?
I know a I played like ass but what the hell!
Fifty said:Those two posts are mighty conflicting. Please tell me you not getting the Heat hasn't turned you insane.
Shimmy all you want, but that sounds like BS. Sim league. You and Bog can play 1 on 1 .
Fifty said:Those two posts are mighty conflicting. Please tell me you not getting the Heat hasn't turned you insane.
Shimmy all you want, but that sounds like BS. Sim league. You and Bog can play 1 on 1 .
Cerrius said:oh please, the game was a blowout. I don't think there's anything wrong with chucking up threes with toine when the outcome was obvious.
Fifty said:Shimmy all you want, but that sounds like BS. Sim league. You and Bog can play 1 on 1 .
ColdBlooded33 said:Richard Hamilton wasnt "chucking up 3's" in a blow out win.
Cerrius said:Richard Hamilton's last game: FG Attempts: 44, rest of team FG attempts: 30
OMG PLAY SIM
DMczaf said:Matrix, game?
VC vs. T-Mac! Cousin vs. Cousin!
Matrix said:Playing my league game against Fifty in 5 mins.
ColdBlooded33 said:...And? If he wants to play Kobe with Richard Hamilton thats fine. Your missing the point here. There is no reason to chuck up 3-pointers in a blowout. Thats like Peyton Manning throwing bombs to Marvin Harrison in the 4th quarter, 4 minutes left, with a 28 point lead.
Cerrius said:Richard Hamilton's last game: FG Attempts: 44, rest of team FG attempts: 30
OMG PLAY SIM
DMczaf said:Richard Hamilton wants the damn ball! GET HIM THE DAMN BALL!