I kind of get the second part of the post, consoles are more of a plug and play experience and you don't worry about the settings, because most of the time you can't even change anything besides toggling between a fidelity/performance mode. But how is a 5800x and a 3080 shitty PC in 2024? I seriously can't believe what I read on this forum sometimes.Funny I only ever hear about PCs that make consoles look like shit but when I built one it cost around 2000 dollars and is currently pretty shitty(5800x and 3080 shit card, basically a 2080TI with better RT and rasterization(or wtf ever).
Can't stand gaming on my PC, so I only use PS5, PC collects dust. PC can probably play most games better than PS5 but you know, my 3080 doesn't support any frame gen so it's pretty super shitty and basically useless and obsolete.
Glad to see us actually judging PCs as gaming devices properly instead of just using them as talismans to ward off the evil console makers.
One thing I heard lately that really tripped me up. In the other thread about steamdeck, there was a PC guy in there saying how the steamdeck totally changed their view of handheld PCs. That since they gamed on the deck, they were able to just forget about everything and game again(they didn't say this part, but as I've stated numerous times when you game on PC you are thinking about many things besides gaming, like performance, like mods, like "did that mod I installed cause the crash, better test" and other things about your big investment). With the deck they were able to just stop worrying about it, relax and play.
Well you know what? The steam deck is a CONSOLE! The reason you love it is because it has uniform hardware and support from valve. It isn't "yours" or something "you built" it is just a simple console that lets you play your games without worrying about ANYTHING. So why don't you PC gamers see that this also has benefits? Isn't it actually childish to worry so much about graphics to the point it creates a neurosis in yourself and you can't enjoy games, and more mature to prefer convenience and uniform hardware? That man in the other thread I mentioned could not enjoy gaming anymore until he swapped to a console. Think about that.
The only childish thing is thinking all PC gamers have such a neurosis about graphics or mods. You know what I did to play the recently released Space Marine 2? I launched the game from Steam, checked DLSS was enabled, and clicked play.Funny I only ever hear about PCs that make consoles look like shit but when I built one it cost around 2000 dollars and is currently pretty shitty(5800x and 3080 shit card, basically a 2080TI with better RT and rasterization(or wtf ever).
Can't stand gaming on my PC, so I only use PS5, PC collects dust. PC can probably play most games better than PS5 but you know, my 3080 doesn't support any frame gen so it's pretty super shitty and basically useless and obsolete.
Glad to see us actually judging PCs as gaming devices properly instead of just using them as talismans to ward off the evil console makers.
One thing I heard lately that really tripped me up. In the other thread about steamdeck, there was a PC guy in there saying how the steamdeck totally changed their view of handheld PCs. That since they gamed on the deck, they were able to just forget about everything and game again(they didn't say this part, but as I've stated numerous times when you game on PC you are thinking about many things besides gaming, like performance, like mods, like "did that mod I installed cause the crash, better test" and other things about your big investment). With the deck they were able to just stop worrying about it, relax and play.
Well you know what? The steam deck is a CONSOLE! The reason you love it is because it has uniform hardware and support from valve. It isn't "yours" or something "you built" it is just a simple console that lets you play your games without worrying about ANYTHING. So why don't you PC gamers see that this also has benefits? Isn't it actually childish to worry so much about graphics to the point it creates a neurosis in yourself and you can't enjoy games, and more mature to prefer convenience and uniform hardware? That man in the other thread I mentioned could not enjoy gaming anymore until he swapped to a console. Think about that.
Wrong. Supports every frame gen (DLSS3 FG forced through DLSSG to FSR3).my 3080 doesn't support any frame gen so it's pretty super shitty and basically useless and obsolete.
Very wrong, for obvious reasons.Well you know what? The steam deck is a CONSOLE!
To be fair, I wasn't aware my 3080 supported FG, so I do appreciate that tip and I'm going to look into it. It is still a meh card imho. It was a terrible upgrade at the time I bought it. 2080ti was on sale for much cheaper but I opted for the 3080 and still kinda regret. I upgraded from a 2080 iirc. I was looking recently at the spec sheets for wukong and assumed my card would not provide frame gen(it didn't perform so hot in their benchmarks iirc, despite the astronomical cost).Wrong. Supports every frame gen (DLSS3 FG forced through DLSSG to FSR3).
Very wrong, for obvious reasons.
my 3080 doesn't support any frame gen
To be fair, I wasn't aware my 3080 supported FG, so I do appreciate that tip and I'm going to look into it. It is still a meh card imho
AMD's FSR3 frame gen works even on 20xx series cards, no?
Yep, even older cards.
U have no idea, bro, both console and pcmr warriors already working hard and its 1,5months till ps5pr0 launch only.If this thread is any indication...PS5 Pro vs PC comparison threads are going to be a fucking warzone. Lol.
I searched, "Nvidia frame generation work on a 3080"AMD's FSR3 frame gen works even on 20xx series cards, no?
Oh shit really? Didn't know that. Perhaps my 1060 laptop can survive through next year for games like Trails into Daybreak 2. * if supported.
3080 is hotter than PS5 GPU and on paper will be ~as hot as the Pro GPU in resolution and framerate.To be fair, I wasn't aware my 3080 supported FG, so I do appreciate that tip and I'm going to look into it. It is still a meh card imho. It was a terrible upgrade at the time I bought it. 2080ti was on sale for much cheaper but I opted for the 3080 and still kinda regret. I upgraded from a 2080 iirc. I was looking recently at the spec sheets for wukong and assumed my card would not provide frame gen(it didn't perform so hot in their benchmarks iirc, despite the astronomical cost).
Black Myth: Wukong GPU Benchmark
Black Myth: Wukong is a new action RPG that's gained attention for its stunning visuals and intense combat. Today, we'll focus on GPU benchmarking to compare performance...www.techspot.com
I mean, even you gotta admit 3080 don't look so hot on those benchmarks....I can't remember what I paid but it was at launch, and way higher than a Ps5 Pro.
I think it is interesting to say Steam Deck isn't a console at least in spirit. You think the steam deck isn't a console at all or at least console adjacent? Let's forget textbook definitions and speak in general terms here.
It seems to me the Steam Deck is a way to provide a console like experience using a portable PC but also offering extra expandability for users who want to mod it or alter it. Seems like the device is trying to use the benefits of a console on a prebuilt PC that is also mobile(with great success). However, let's be honest, isn't the PC bit extra. I assume most people are using Steam deck as a plug and play console like experience, no? I could be wrong. What do you think? Maybe most people are using theirs as a PC first and a game console second, but I just have trouble imagining that. I would guess that most Steam Deck users who find they love the device are loving it because of how adjacent it is a console. That simplicity has an appeal, no?
I do get that, I accept your classification, it is a PC, but but but...the reason it appeals to so many is because it is a PC that also has benefits of a console, such as uniform hardware and plug and play. The reason is may feel like a breath of fresh air to play is imho the convenience of it. It was copied from the Switch, no? Isn't that convenience why it is such a groundbreaking product? One can simply turn it on and go, and that is a feature that a custom built PC lacks.3080 is hotter than PS5 GPU and on paper will be ~as hot as the Pro GPU in resolution and framerate.
Steam Deck can run everything a Desktop and laptop can, so until a console can't do the same, it is a PC.
The uniform hardware still has basically the same drivers and APIs and it is just as plug and play as any pre build PC with Steam installed.I do get that, I accept your classification, it is a PC, but but but...the reason it appeals to so many is because it is a PC that also has benefits of a console, such as uniform hardware and plug and play. The reason is may feel like a breath of fresh air to play is imho the convenience of it. It was copied from the Switch, no? Isn't that convenience why it is such a groundbreaking product? One can simply turn it on and go, and that is a feature that a custom built PC lacks.
Better yet, let me ask this. Does uniform hardware offer an advantage to a gaming platform in any way?
Oh shit really? Didn't know that. Perhaps my 1060 laptop can survive through next year for games like Trails into Daybreak 2. * if supported.
There are virtually zero stutters in this game, parrot.%100 of them can enjoy stutters though
Look man, I appreciate your input. I'm sorry everyone. I'm backing out of the thread now, slowly. Steam Deck is a PC and not a console and 3080 is a great card with great frame generation.The uniform hardware still has basically the same drivers and APIs and it is just as plug and play as any pre build PC with Steam installed.
This is a outrage.
MS has infinite war chest but our very own MS gaming representative has to make due with that?!
Lol. I don't need any video. I played the demo and other users here on GAF too stated almost zero or zero stutters noticed.
Not here. Or at least not noticed, unless I turned on some frame time graphics.Before driver update and demo patches (lol) it was stuttering. Basically compiling shaders real time.
And how many PS5s could run it at 1080p 60fps? Oh right, that'd be zero
lol stoop, its getting sad.Yep.
Enjoying your stutter free non blurry mess?
Of course it is sad. It is a PS5 screen, with frame time graphics.lol stoop, its getting sad.
You are preaching to the choir here.Who is "they"? Nice generalization there. And yes, if a game like FF16 barely runs at 60 FPS average at 1080p, medium settings on a 4090, it is most definitely poorly optimized.
Whats that got to do with me. I don't care what the idots that have double standards do or who they are... but those that it applies to, would know themselves.Because everyone knows the double standards and hypocrisy only come from PC gamers…right.
There are a lot of PC gamers who don't play the latest triple A games anyway. I recently finished Pathfinder for example. Graphics don't make a game good.The only childish thing is thinking all PC gamers have such a neurosis about graphics or mods. You know what I did to play the recently released Space Marine 2? I launched the game from Steam, checked DLSS was enabled, and clicked play.
You don’t enjoy PC, that’s fine, plenty of people don’t. But don’t try and pretend that the hundreds of millions that do all have these issues or concerns.
I still think FFXV looks better than this game, but to its merits, its lighting SOMETIMES look on par to that one. The only thing I can say for sure that looks on a whole new level is the amount of geometry in forest area.These are screenshots from my PS5 (performance mode).
You don't need that much either to beat consoles tho, only a 6700XT/3060Ti, any mid range CPU, which are very cheap, run laps and rounds around consoles CPU so you'll get better results most of the time due to no CPU bottleneck even on bad ports (unless they're TLOUP1 port, that thing is even so uniquely bad that not even Sony could top it with their other ports, which tend to be heavier on PC than others from other studios).Actually surprised it. When you hear PCMR talking down console peasants, you would think 90% are using 4080's or 4090's, then find out only 6% are using 4070. I wonder what GPU most PCMR users are rocking then?
0.10 interested * 0.10 who can comfortably play it = 0.01 so 1% seems to be a problem, at least for the publisher.Yeah, but I doubt more than 10% of Steam users ever had an interest in the game in the first place, so it's hardly a problem.
nope
That's assuming interest in the game and user hardware are unconnected, which I doubt is the case. Someone with an interest in playing current-gen console ports on their PC is unlikely to be one of those people running Steam on their five year-old Dell laptop.0.10 interested * 0.10 who can comfortably play it = 0.01 so 1% seems to be a problem, at least for the publisher.
Even if you concentrate the interest in this game around the alleged 10% that can comfortably play it's still a problem. From 1% to maybe 3%? That's a failure in my book.That's assuming interest in the game and user hardware are unconnected, which I doubt is the case. Someone with an interest in playing current-gen console ports on their PC is unlikely to be one of those people running Steam on their five year-old Dell laptop.
Steam has ~135 million users, so 3% of that would still be around 4 million. I have no idea how well other PC releases of Final Fantasy games have sold, but that doesn't seem too bad to me. I really doubt they'll end up losing money on this port.Even if you concentrate the interest in this game around the alleged 10% that can comfortably play it's still a problem. From 1% to maybe 3%? That's a failure in my book.
Probably closer to 200 million users now.Steam has ~135 million users, so 3% of that would still be around 4 million. I have no idea how well other PC releases of Final Fantasy games have sold, but that doesn't seem too bad to me. I really doubt they'll end up losing money on this port.
Considering the piece of shit it is I doubt they wouldn't break even with just 100 copies sold.Steam has ~135 million users, so 3% of that would still be around 4 million. I have no idea how well other PC releases of Final Fantasy games have sold, but that doesn't seem too bad to me. I really doubt they'll end up losing money on this port.
Not really a surprise after it's console debut and the games before. They don't really optimize these days, they just lower details until it is running.Square Enix doesn’t seem to have put too much effort into optimization. Therefore, visually more stunning games that should be much more demanding on the system are easier to run than Final Fantasy 16.
- A detailed analysis shows you need at least an RTX 4070 to run Final Fantasy 16 at native 1080p 60 FPS at medium.
- This makes over 90% of Steam users unable to reach 60 FPS because of the optimization issues.
- Only 6% of users on Steam have an RTX 4070 or a better GPU, making the game limited for the masses.
The graph shows Final Fantasy 16 only runs at native medium 1080p 60 FPS on RTX 4070 and above
According to a detailed analysis, to run the game at 100% scaling without using DLSS or FSR 1080p medium at 60 FPS, you need at least a GeForce RTX 4070 graphics card. The GPU falls in the upper mid-range of GPUs, which everybody can’t afford.
Source