Ghost_Protocol
Member
Man, I'm swapping back and forth between The Oreilly Factor and The Ed Show and I cannot decide who the bigger idiots are. The hosts or their guests.
Man, I'm swapping back and forth between The Oreilly Factor and The Ed Show and I cannot decide who the bigger idiots are. The hosts or their guests.
Because they do?And Obama has never accused Republicans of wanting to end Medicare?
Because they do?
The systemic trajectory is clearly ascendant.
Yeah, well, PolitiFact is wrong on that. Nice try. If I convert my garage into a shed, should I still call it a garage?That was Politifacts biggest lie of 2011.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/
That was Politifacts biggest lie of 2011.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/
And Obama has never accused Republicans of wanting to end Medicare?
That was Politifacts biggest lie of 2011.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/
The facts are Republicans want to end Medicare.
And Obama has never accused Republicans of wanting to end Medicare?
That was a weak four-seam over the middle of the plate.Or...
The people who watch them ; )
That's what she said!
I actually have little idea how Romney would actually govern. He's flip-flopped and equivocated to such a degree that I doubt even he knows. Although, if I were to place a bet, I'd wager on poorly.Man does the GOP live in a bubble, did anyone watch Romney's speech. I love how he said Obama was hiding and that we don't have to wait 4 years to find out what he (Romney) stands for and has planned.
I may have missed something but does someone care to enlighten me on Romney's vast plans for the economy and the US if he becomes President. Because right now outside him agreeing with the Ryan Budget I am at a loss lol
"As we know it" are the key words.And I'm sure he's said the sky is blue, and water is wet, at some point in his life. Republicans have wanted to end Medicare for decades, and they've tried to end it in two consecutive budgets now, both of which Romney has endorsed. Oh wait, I'm sorry: As we know it.
Politifact is not infallible, as much as they'd like to think they are. They're as shitty and lazy as most journalistic entities in America. The only difference is they focus elusively on fact checking.
Politifact also rated a statement in February claiming 40% was a majority as "mostly true".
Politifact is not infallible, as much as they'd like to think they are. They're as shitty and lazy as most journalistic entities in America. The only difference is they focus exclusively on fact checking.
"As we know it" are the key words.
Looks like someone beat you to it.
"As we know it" are the key words.
No, they're not. You can change the Marine Corps into an organization that exclusively gives puppies to sick kids, but they ain't going to be the Marines anymore. That's the same name plastered over something different.
Seems like I hear a fair bit about at least one of the Supreme Court Justices retiring during this next Presidential term. Who is expected to leave, and are they liberal or conservative?
Have you even read the Ryan plan?
It gives the option of a government subsidized private plan or the traditional medicare if you so choose.
Why do you hate choice?
That was Politifacts biggest lie of 2011.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ar-democrats-claims-republicans-voted-end-me/
It's a shame that so many people think that being objective equates to taking a middle path, as though one side can't be far more wrong than the other.
It's increased 2 years. Big deal.It's not traditional Medicare. First of all, he increases the eligibility age. Second, his plan's premium increases are adjusted by overall inflation, not medical inflation costs. Traditional Medicare will be there for a while until the medical CPI rises above it. So it won't die immediately, but die it will.
I hate choices when they're shitty ones provided by shitty people for shitty reasons.
Can we please ban Politifacts?
They are the VG-Chartz of political fact checkers.
This is the second time today someone linked to something that was bullshit by them.
It's increased 2 years. Big deal.
What's your guy's plan?
You mean aside from IPAB, 500 billion dollars in cuts to provider payments, higher premiums for wealthier seniors, a whole host of cost control reforms in PPACA, and the possibility of raising the retirement age (as offered to Boehner during the debt ceiling debacle)?
Are you serious?
It's increased 2 years. Big deal.
You don't think rich people should pay more? Why kind of liberal are you?
What in the world are you talking about? Your trolling is so annoying.
What in the world are you talking about? Your trolling is so annoying.
Nah, just pseudo-non-partisan hackery masquerading as journalism.Oh please. Let's ban everything that we don't agree with.
You're not being serious. You asked for Obama's plan for Medicare. I gave it to you. Now that I've provided you with some facts, you're deflecting with a question. Unbelievable.You just said wealthier seniors will be paying higher premiums. What's wrong with that?
You're not being serious. You asked for Obama's plan for Medicare. I gave it to you. Now that I've provided you with some facts, you're deflecting with a question. Unbelievable.
What's unbelievable about it? It's classic Baggins. Plant the flag on something and then run away to shoot at people trying to capture it.You're not being serious. You asked for Obama's plan for Medicare. I gave it to you. Now that I've provided you with some facts, you're deflecting with a question. Unbelievable.
You're right. It's more efficient.Premium support is a fundamentally different thing from a single payer system. Stop trolling.
You're right. It's more efficient.
You're right. It's more efficient.
I have to stop now anyway. Women are calling. It's going to be a long night.
If you listen you can hear the goalposts shifting.How the fuck is it more efficient when Medicare has lower administrative costs than private insurance?
Wut? For who is it more efficient? The insurance company profiting off the health of sick citizens? That is the only explanation you could possibly give me that would even begin to make sense. Because it is an absolute FACT we pay more into our current health system and get even less from it on just about every single payer system in the world. More premiums for drugs, more premiums for selective care, hospital visits, preventive care you name it, none of which also leads to bankruptcy of the individual in the single payer system and because it all comes from a single pool it means there is also a cheaper and more balanced system to pay for the services across the board for the nation.
How the fuck is it more efficient when Medicare has lower administrative costs than private insurance?
You're not being serious. You asked for Obama's plan for Medicare. I gave it to you. Now that I've provided you with some facts, you're deflecting with a question. Unbelievable.
How the fuck is it more efficient when Medicare has lower administrative costs than private insurance?
Given that the population in question is likely to be one in high need of services, what happens once insurers decide to charge more than the voucher?Puddles? I didn't recognize you.
If insurers are forced to compete for seniors' business, health plans will demand lower prices from doctors, hospitals and drug companies. And so on and so on. What is the incentive in the Medicare (I call it Old Medicare) for keeping prices down?
Flying Phoenix. Calm down. Its alright. I sometimes have an opposing view. And..
I'm a busy man. I can't always be here.
Puddles? I didn't recognize you.
If insurers are forced to compete for seniors' business, health plans will demand lower prices from doctors, hospitals and drug companies. And so on and so on. What is the incentive in the Medicare (I call it Old Medicare) for keeping prices down?
Given that the population in question is likely to be one in high need of services, what happens once insurers decide to charge more than the voucher?
Eh. I like having bulboo around______________________________________________
I've noticed that this often happens. Bulbo comes out from under the bridge and says something that angers you guys. Then after he gets you all riled up he disappears only to appear again a few hours later. May I give my previous suggestion again so we can save thread space.
You think insurance companies will simply elect to charge no more than the amount issued in the government vouchers? Why wouldn't they?I think the voucher amounts would act as limiters in a way. Maybe.
Wow, so my 18 year old co-worker today said he voted in the primary the other day. He also let it slip that he voted for Rick Santorum. But he did so because his dad pretty much made him. He didn't know anything about the candidates and didn't think he should vote, but his dad said something like "What, doing what your dad tells you isn't good enough?" And then his dad proceeded to stand right behind him while he voted. What the fuck...
Sounds like the kid should go to college and get the shit away from him