• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2013 |OT1| Never mind, Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't Obama have fourteen people on stage everytime he makes a speech in the East Wing?

They are always people directly affected by the issue at hand and have specifically spoke before about it.
 

Acheron

Banned
I have this West Wing fantasy of Obama framing the debt ceiling as economic hostage taking from day one, and saying day one he won't sign anything but a clean bill and actually holding firm. Every day he uses his bully pulpit: "America does not negotiate with terrorists." Every day Democrats are on message saying the same thing.



Fantasies are nice.

The West Wing is not representative of reality, I don't know why so many expect Democratic presidents to measure up against Sorkin's cartoon characters.
 

pigeon

Banned
The West Wing is not representative of reality, I don't know why so many expect Democratic presidents to measure up against Sorkin's cartoon characters.

Yglesias had a great series of tweets last week about how if Bartlett were real liberals would've freaked the fuck out about all his absurd compromises.
 
Actually I'm a fan of this now. Sorry for the freakout roller coaster. I just fear now republicans are gonna see the fact that they've given up taxes for future spending cuts that won't happen are going to cancel this.
 

RDreamer

Member
Ah, I see, he's already framing things for the next fight and any fight after that revenue from the wealthy has to come with anything and everything.
 
Actually I'm a fan of this now. Sorry for the freakout roller coaster. I just fear now republicans are gonna see the fact that they've given up taxes for future spending cuts that won't happen are going to cancel this.

What changed your mind?

Yeah this'll work for the Republicans. President comes out seeming reasonable and caring, and then Republicans come out foaming at the mouth. Good luck with that lol

Either way they lose, which I think is the point.
 
Obama's making it harder for a deal to be made. https://twitter.com/samsteinhp/status/285820795295526912


I think thats bs and they are just reading this and realizing they're never gonna get their cuts and making up excuses to scuttle the deal

What changed your mind?

The boehner quote that if you don't do taxes and spending at the same time spending never gets cut. I think its true. It just made me realized I'm only freaked out about some future possibility that actually never has happened. I mean we didn't even get cuts out of the debt ceiling debate we got a deadline for cuts plus a few minor ones. Congress doesn't actually want to cut spending

With this deal all we get for sure is more taxes
 
reality check:

- Obama insists that there is no deal right now. The info from the Senate GOP piped through Rebecca Berg and co. has always been a bit fuzzy compared to reality in the past. No one in the GOP wants to negotiate after we go over the cliff because their hand is so much weaker, I am thinking that the currently discussed numbers are part of the same game they have been playing for weeks.

- No bill gets through the House without Obama's blessing because w/o it Dems won't vote for it and Boehner can't get the votes for anything right now.
 
Obama's bargaining position to the GOP should be "We can do a deal now or we can do a deal in a week when you have less power than you do now." Nothing bad will happen if taxes go up for 1 week.
 

Chichikov

Member
I think that's a sound tactic, make them break the Norquist pledge now, then deal with it more seriously once you have a new congress while still retaining the upper policy hand by not raising the taxes on the rich as much as you promised during the election.
Obama's bargaining position to the GOP should be "We can do a deal now or we can do a deal in a week when you have less power than you do now." Nothing bad will happen if taxes go up for 1 week.
Taxes are not the issue, congress will fall over itself to re-cut them.
It's the spending that worries me.
Though I'm honestly not even sure how it will play out in practical terms.
 
I think that's a sound tactic, make them break the Norquist pledge now, then deal with it more seriously once you have a new congress while still retaining the upper policy hand by not raising the taxes on the rich as much as you promised during the election.

This is how I'm beginning to see it. I think this actually differs a lot from other caves. They're not "giving up" anything. Just not getting every thing they wanted.


And exactly why I changed my mind
 

pigeon

Banned
Obama's bargaining position to the GOP should be "We can do a deal now or we can do a deal in a week when you have less power than you do now." Nothing bad will happen if taxes go up for 1 week.

This is only relevant to recalcitrant GOP reps, none of whom actually matter right now. The negotiations are already proceeding from a post-cliff framework, that's why $800 billion in revenue unaccompanied by any spending cuts is the starting position.
 
Guys, if the deal is a few small tax raises on the rich and no spending cuts, it is a good deal. Fucking let Republicans push for spending cuts in three months. What cuts have they ever been able to name? They will just continue to act like children, appear to hold the country hostage, and poison their own brand. Meanwhile Obama and the Dems look like adults for compromising before the new year.

Shit, let them keep it up until 2014. Who cares? Democrats can only benefit from the tea party's kamikaze anti-spending tactics. The American people don't really want spending cuts, so if Republicans want to keep pushing for them every time the debt ceiling comes up, let them. Something has got to give eventually; they will either have to start naming cuts (which is a poison pill for them) or they will have to give it up.

edit: And if the deal has 100 billion in stimulus, even better.
 

pigeon

Banned
I just read Team of Rivals and was struck by the fact that Lincoln was accused of being a spineless conciliator and moving too slowly every time he did anything. You guys are playing right into Obama's hands here.
 
The only thing I can make of this is that there are apparently some bad things to going over this cliff that Obama sees but no one else does...

Aghhhhhhhhh damn it, folding again ugh
 

ISOM

Member
Other than obama compromising/caving on the 250k threshold can anyone else tell me why liberals don't like this deal?
 
I just read Team of Rivals and was struck by the fact that Lincoln was accused of being a spineless conciliator and moving too slowly every time he did anything. You guys are playing right into Obama's hands here.

Obama's not trying to keep the union together, win a war and end slavery. He's trying to raise taxes by 4%
 
If Obama endorsed a Republican proposal to avert the fiscal cliff, verbatim, and urged Democratic senators to pass it, Cantor and crew would still be accusing him of torpedoing the process.

They must really feel uncomfortable having a black president telling them what to do. Seriously, what the hell speech were they watching?
 
I can totally see why, so far this deal:

-Raises at least 600 billion in revenue
-Has no entitlement cuts
-Has no spending cuts
-About 100 billion in stimulative tax policies (continuation)

I just keep looking this over and, as a deal by itself, I'm like 75% behind it now. As a deal in context of how to handle the debt ceiling and other items? I'm more iffy on it.
 

Clevinger

Member
I just read Team of Rivals and was struck by the fact that Lincoln was accused of being a spineless conciliator and moving too slowly every time he did anything. You guys are playing right into Obama's hands here.

But what good or big things has O gotten post-Republican House? I'm not denying they exist, I just don't remember them.

I sort of sympathize with him because Republicans are the most insane and obstructionist as they've ever been, but his leadership (or lack there of) makes the problem much worse.



That's deep, Khloe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom