Rep. Peter King (R-NY) suggested that the torture referenced in a Senate report released earlier in the week is actually just referring to "people being made to stand in awkward positions."
"I dont believe these are torture at all. For instance waterboarding, there were medical personnel present during the whole time. It creates tremendous discomfort theres no doubt about it. It creates tremendous fear, but the fact is there was no lasting damage to these people and we got information from them, which is very helpful," King said in an interview on New York's WCBS. The interview was flagged by Buzzfeed.
The trendline is pretty clear there, though. Newton was just a speedbump to the shift, nothing more.
Also, the question on gun control is always laughably stupid.
When asked about specifics, such as universal background checks, it still has massive support.
It would simplify my list of countries to never visit:
Any Middle Eastern Country
Any African Country sans South Africa.
North Korea
Cuba
Confederate States of America
Pretty easy. I wonder if the new congress would pass a law to allow states to rescind their statehood. lmao
I'm batting 1.000 on your list.It would simplify my list of countries to never visit:
Any Middle Eastern Country
Any African Country sans South Africa.
North Korea
Cuba
Confederate States of America
Pretty easy. I wonder if the new congress would pass a law to allow states to rescind their statehood. lmao
The trendline is pretty clear there, though. Newton was just a speedbump to the shift, nothing more.
Also, the question on gun control is always laughably stupid.
When asked about specifics, such as universal background checks, it still has massive support.
The trendline is pretty clear there, though. Newton was just a speedbump to the shift, nothing more.
Also, the question on gun control is always laughably stupid.
When asked about specifics, such as universal background checks, it still has massive support.
Peter King is continuing to prove that he is also a complete idiot.
Only in America would a news network give the orchestrator of crimes against humanity an interview and then call it a great interview.
I just want to make some kind of joke about that last line.
Kentuckys Tourism Arts & Heritage Cabinet Secretary Bob Stewart informed representatives of the proposed Ark Encounter tourist attraction today that their project will not be eligible for up to $18 million in tax incentives from the state, due to their refusal to pledge not to discriminate in hiring based on religion.
As you know, since the filing of the original incentive application in 2010, we have strongly supported this project, believing it to be a tourism attraction based on biblical themes that would create significant jobs for the community, wrote Stewart in a letter to Ark Encounters attorney. However, based on various postings on the Answers in Genesis (AIG) and Ark Encounter websites, reports from Ark Encounter investor meetings and our correspondence, it is readily apparent that the project has evolved from a tourism attraction to an extension of AIGs ministry that will no longer permit the Commonwealth to grant the project tourism development incentives.
Certainly, Ark Encounter has every right to change the nature of the project from a tourism attraction to a ministry, wrote Stewart. However, state tourism tax incentives cannot be used to fund religious indoctrination or otherwise be used to advance religion. The use of state incentives in this way violates the Separation of Church and State provisions of the Constitution and is therefore impermissible.
Stewart went on to wish the Ark Encounter project well, despite the fact that it will receive no money or incentives from the state.
Goddamn it. Sean Hannity just retweeted someone who tweeted a picture of one of the Isis beheading. I had avoided them for so long...
It would simplify my list of countries to never visit:
Any Middle Eastern Country
Any African Country sans South Africa.
North Korea
Cuba
Confederate States of America
Pretty easy. I wonder if the new congress would pass a law to allow states to rescind their statehood. lmao
Anal leakage is running for president again. Yaaaaaaaaaaaassss!
Ben Carson leads the way for the Republicans with 19% to 15% for Jeb Bush, 14% each for Chris Christie and Mike Huckabee, 11% for Paul Ryan, 7% for Rick Perry, 5% each for Ted Cruz and Rand Paul, and 4% for Marco Rubio.
Carson's name recognition isn't as high as the other Republicans, but among those familiar with him 47% have a favorable opinion to just 12% with a negative one. Huckabee (67/17) and Bush (61/17) are also pretty popular with the Republican base, while feelings toward Christie (42/32) are considerably more mixed.
On the Democratic side Hillary Clinton continues to be pretty dominant. She's at 52% to 18% for Joe Biden, 7% for Elizabeth Warren, 5% for Bernie Sanders, 4% for Andrew Cuomo, 2% for Jim Webb, 1% for Martin O'Malley, and less than half a percent for Brian Schweitzer.
What's particularly noteworthy in Clinton's numbers is how consistent they are across various demographic lines. She's at 55% with 'very liberal' voters, 55% with 'somewhat liberal' ones, and 52% with moderates. She's at 57% with African Americans and 52% with whites. She's at 53% with seniors, 52% with middle aged voters, and 52% with younger voters. The only place where you see a real divide is along gender lines where she gets 56% with women and 48% with men.
At least at this very early stage it looks like North Carolina will yet again be a swing state in 2016 if Clinton is indeed the Democrat nominee. She is very closely matched with all of her potential Republican opponents, leading Mike Huckabee and Chris Christie each by 2 points at 46/44 and 44/42 respectively, while tying Bush and Carson at 46% and 44% respectively. Those numbers show there isn't a big electability difference between the Republican candidates at least at this point. We also tested Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren in head to head match ups with Bush and Carson, and they fare a good bit worse than Clinton. Biden trails Bush 47/42 and Carson 45/40, while Warren trails Bush 46/39 and Carson 44/37.
Wait so you're telling me that Ben Carson not only has traction in the Republican primary, but is competitive in a general election?
Amazing how North Carolina is a swing state now, albeit the reddest one. Gore lost it by 13 points while winning the national popular vote by .5.If they're still struggling to defend North Carolina 18 months from now..? Ha!
Amazing how North Carolina is a swing state now, albeit the reddest one. Gore lost it by 13 points while winning the national popular vote by .5.
Hillary would have a very outside chance of winning it if she invested there. So no, not really.It's going the way of Florida and Virginia and the psychotic state government/legislature may accelerate that.
Do you think Indiana might be in play again?
There's been a lot of buzz about Ted Strickland running for the U.S. Senate race in Ohio and he's said he's interested, but that he might defer to a younger candidate like Tim Ryan. Either one would be a great candidate.
My dream slate:
FL - Pat Murphy
IL - Tammy Duckworth
NC - Kay Hagan
NH - Maggie Hassan
OH - Ted Strickland
PA - Joe Sestak
WI - Russ Feingold
AZ and IA could also be competitive - I'd pick Kyrsten Sinema and Tom Vilsack for those.
And of course the only really competitive seats the Democrats will have to defend are Bennet in CO and Reid in NV.
Huh. I wonder to what extent Heller and McDonald contributed to that change? I also wonder whether more widespread personal experience with guns--or simply the combination of increasingly lax gun control laws coupled with a declining crime rate--have had any role in it?
This is also another data point suggesting that the nation is not becoming more progressive, but more libertarian.
Or fearmongering by the media is at extraordinary levels. I am willing to bet that the majority of the population, especially the majority of gun owners are not aware about the declining crime rate.
It's a pretty silly question when you look at it. Tells you nothing about what Americans actually want in legislation. Framing it as just which is more important to someone, without any context for what either means in actual law.
I love it.Amazing how North Carolina is a swing state now, albeit the reddest one. Gore lost it by 13 points while winning the national popular vote by .5.
Dick Cheney is a scumbag for throwing his buddy under the bus like that.
All the cool kids call it "speedbumping."Coincidentally, throwing someone under the bus is now considered an enhanced interrogation technique.
Coincidentally, throwing someone under the bus is now considered an enhanced interrogation technique.
So the spending bill didn't pass and we're facing another shut down at midnight? Fucking seriously?
I love it.
Meanwhile, the Republican base (seen very easily over at FR) seems thinking, "hey, it's been two terms of one party in the White House.. now the electorate will swing to us - it's our turn! That's how it works, right?" If Hillary does indeed win, they're going to be as shocked as they were after the Great Unskewing Fiasco of 2012 - maybe even moreso, actually.
Those numbers also tell something else - that Hillary has still somehow maintained a separate branding from Obama. I'm wondering if the contentious 2008 primary race left an impression in people's minds.. maybe they're wondering about the road not taken?
Huh. I wonder to what extent Heller and McDonald contributed to that change? I also wonder whether more widespread personal experience with guns--or simply the combination of increasingly lax gun control laws coupled with a declining crime rate--have had any role in it?
This is also another data point suggesting that the nation is not becoming more progressive, but more libertarian.
Wait so you're telling me that Ben Carson not only has traction in the Republican primary, but is competitive in a general election?
And that's WITH Republicans, so he's basically "Generic Republican" for probably half the people or more polled for the head-to-head.Carson's name recognition isn't as high as the other Republicans
Eh, I see clear inflection points due to fear mongering over terrorism and Obama. People were ok with the idea of controlling guns when they didn't think Obama was going to disarm them so Osama could slit their throats. Now it's just a partisan issue, like all the rest. This is really nothing but a sign that GOP scare tactics are very effective. I bet you'll see an immediate warming towards gun control when the black guy is out of the WH.
Eh, I see clear inflection points due to fear mongering over terrorism and Obama. People were ok with the idea of controlling guns when they didn't think Obama was going to disarm them so Osama could slit their throats. Now it's just a partisan issue, like all the rest. This is really nothing but a sign that GOP scare tactics are very effective. I bet you'll see an immediate warming towards gun control when the black guy is out of the WH.
Because if there's one thing this country clearly needs, it's for the upper class to do even better, because they clearly haven't done well enough the past 35 years.
FTFY
Guns have been a partisan issue for decades...
More comedyAnal leakage is running for president again. Yaaaaaaaaaaaassss!
Somewhat. But the Dems have largely avoided the issue for a long time. They only really picked it up again after Sandy hook & colorado shooting. And they've let it go since those failures. If people don't want it then there is not much you can do. We have decided as a country that it is acceptable to have so many people die from gun deaths in order to allow citizens to have guns.
I'm sure we'll revisit this at the next huge gun tragedy or when gun deaths exceed automobile deaths.