Having a Republican president able to restock the conservative wing of the Supreme Court would be a disaster.As a democrat, I think Jeb wouldn't be that bad as president.
Having a Republican president able to restock the conservative wing of the Supreme Court would be a disaster.As a democrat, I think Jeb wouldn't be that bad as president.
Having a Republican president able to restock the conservative wing of the Supreme Court would be a disaster.
This seems as good a time as ever to point out Clinton has a 13-point lead on Bush according to a new Marist poll. (12 against Romney and Christie, 14 against Paul)
Yes Clinton's lead will become less gaudy when the candidates are actually running, but this seems to disprove the "Hillary's numbers are ALREADY DROPPING!" meme that seems to already be going around here since she's leading by the same margins she always has.
Although it is fun to dream about what a 13 point popular vote lead would probably look like
http://www.270towin.com/2016_election_predictions.php?mapid=bJhi
Quinnipiac isn't the most reliable pollster honestly. They get good results in their home states (CT, NY) but everywhere else is kind of hit or miss.Didn't the Quinnipiac poll from that 538 article show her down to Romney by 1? How can these be so different?
Quinnipiac isn't the most reliable pollster honestly. They get good results in their home states (CT, NY) but everywhere else is kind of hit or miss.
This seems as good a time as ever to point out Clinton has a 13-point lead on Bush according to a new Marist poll. (12 against Romney and Christie, 14 against Paul)
Yes Clinton's lead will become less gaudy when the candidates are actually running, but this seems to disprove the "Hillary's numbers are ALREADY DROPPING!" meme that seems to already be going around here since she's leading by the same margins she always has.
Although it is fun to dream about what a 13 point popular vote lead would probably look like
http://www.270towin.com/2016_election_predictions.php?mapid=bJhi
I like how Republicans bringing up the Bradley Effect is basically admitting the country is racist.I would love to see how the right reacts if she were to maintain even one third of that lead for the whole campaign. Would they still be able delude themselves into thinking they'll win ("Gallup shows them in a dead heat!") like they did with the Bradley Effect and unskewing? And if they knew defeat was coming, would this depress turnout?
(I wish work was slower today. I'm sure FreeRepublic is having kittens right now over all of this Jeb-Mania)
Also, polling CT isn't very hard. Our (and I use our because I grew up there) population numbers are fairly consistent and there hasn't been any huge demographic changes in the past 10 years.
A Bush vs Clinton election would solidify the fact that Tudor England was more of a Democracy than modern America
Agreed, for the most part.I still don't think a "lol Clinton wins" mentality over the next two years is good for the party. A competitive primary made Obama a better candidate in the general, and it isn't like Hillary is without fault in campaigning. The Democratic Party has a built-in advantage on general elections, but it isn't impossible to see Hillary (or any Democrat) lose.
Regardless, I don't like the Clintons a whole lot outside of Bill being able to give a great speech. I'd gladly throw my vote and financial support to her campaign in a general election, but I'm going to hold out hope for a contentious primary first before I line up behind her.
Jeb is hands-down the best possible candidate for the Republicans. He probably won't win the primary, but he's their best shot, IMO.
If he made it through, you'd see a lot of people having to make difficult choices, especially if he successfully moves on Immigration.
just stop it
No, its absolutely true.
An entire generation of voters would look at a Clinton vs Bush ticket and stay home. It laughs at the face of what people are told to think America is. A land of oppertunity and equality.
"Anyone can be president!" is the mantra taught to children. If you care enough to follow politics, you know this is bullshit, but spelt out so plainly? A flashing asterisk that says "if youre part of a political ruling family"?
It's unprecedented.
A federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled on Tuesday that President Barack Obama's recent executive actions on immigration are unconstitutional.
"The Court holds that the Executive Action is unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution," wrote U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab, who was appointed by George W. Bush.
Schwab determined that Obama's actions — which pave the way for three-year work permits for more than 4.4 million people (those brought to the U.S. as children and undocumented parents of American citizens) — were illegal because they permit "substantive rights" for "broad categories" of individuals.
3rd Bush or first woman?
not a hard choice.
Did I mention 3rd Bush?
Those same children, growing up with a black guy in the WH and black children living in the White House. Take that shit elsewhere.
You clearly don't know what an actual monarchy is. Bush won't get the nomination so we can dead that right now. And a Clinton winning changes nothing. The same corporatists in charge now will still be in charge. And I'll take it as I'd rather have Obamaca protected and liberal judges on benches including the SC.
There is no guarantee that Clinton would appoint liberal judges, based off her history.
Mark Levin ripped Republicans a new one tonight as he opened his show tonight, saying that he is one inch away from leaving the Republican Party.
He starts in hard, asking Republicans if they think this is a joke, if they think they can just lie to Republicans and conservatives with impunity about defunding Obamacare and fighting Obamas illegal amnesty.
Obama didnt exactly come from hardship.
There is no guarantee that Clinton would appoint liberal judges, based off her history.
And yes, lets protect Obamacare at all costs. Those poor insurance companies need all the subsidies they can get
Being raised by a single mom, including living poor in a third world country, doesn't count as hardship? Then essentially being abandoned by your mom to be raised by your grandparents, struggling to make it in New York...etc.
I'm done. Obama didn't have an easy childhood, and as I'm pretty sure you're white I don't feel like hearing your views on the difference between Obama's blackness experience being different from others.
A crash in Alaska North Slope crude prices that echoes a worldwide drop in the price of oil has raised the possibility of multibillion-dollar deficits in a state where 88 cents of every dollar spent by state government comes from oil production.
Alaska crude hit a four-year low of $60.80 a barrel Thursday, a collapse that threatens jobs, public services and some of the ambitious infrastructure projects needed to harness and navigate the state's vast natural landscape.
State officials are now projecting a $3.5-billion shortfall in funding the state's original spending plans. Across the U.S., oil-producing states are feeling the pinch. Louisiana is mulling cuts in youth programs and road maintenance to fill a $180-million funding gap. New Mexico recently cut its projected revenue growth in half. North Dakota is counting on a rebound in oil prices, higher taxes and increased production to help balance its budget.
None are facing a situation quite so precarious as Alaska's, because no other state relies so heavily on oil production.
"This isn't the hand we thought we would be dealt, quite honestly," said Walker, an independent who defeated Republican Sean Parnell in November. "Nobody anticipated this."
Alaska has about $13 billion in rainy-day savings accounts that will last four to five years at current oil prices and forecasts, provided the new administration makes "prudent reductions," said Office of Management and Budget Director Pat Pitney.
Alaskans also enjoy some of the lowest taxes in the country, with no state sales tax or income tax. Nearly every year-round resident receives an annual check paid for with earnings from a $51-billion Permanent Fund created at a time of windfall oil revenue.
Politicians here are loath to suggest that Permanent Fund revenue be tapped to pay for government, and Walker has said he'll instead focus on cutting state spending, or enacting some broad-based tax.
You know, I didn't know if it were even possible to loathe Dick Cheney more than I already did, but his recent appearances after the CIA torture release has made my level of hatred for the man skyrocket.
"Rarely has a U.S. president been so wrong, about so much, at the cost of so many" from Cheney about Obama is quite memorable. I keep going back and forth between Cheney being a troll or just completely evil.
"And no Republican ticket would have won without a Bush or a Nixon on it since 1928."
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/29/opinion/stanley-jeb-bush/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/22/AR2006102200220.htmlhttp://www.npr.org/blogs/itsallpoli...on-fighting-the-banks-and-her-political-futur
She's going out of her way to keep the door open.
I remember Obama being adamant about saying "no" in 04-06.
Hell, he was more forceful and specific about saying he wouldn't run in 08 than Warren is now.
He announced his run the next February.Monday, October 23, 2006
"Given the responses that I've been getting over the last several months, I have thought about the possibility, but I have not thought about it with the seriousness and depth that I think is required," Obama said on NBC's "Meet the Press." "After November 7th, I'll sit down and consider it, and if at some point, I change my mind, I will make a public announcement and everybody will be able to go at me."
Jeb is hands-down the best possible candidate for the Republicans. He probably won't win the primary, but he's their best shot, IMO.
If he made it through, you'd see a lot of people having to make difficult choices, especially if he successfully moves on Immigration.
I can't believe America would be ready for another Bush in the White House again.
I still think Carson is the GOPs best chance.
He's actually smart (pediatric neurosurgeon), has a well-known story, he's a minority (a fact which could possibly draw some votes from the middle), believes the government should provide catastrophic health care at the expense of private insurance companies, etc. People like him. He can appeal to the general public. I think this board is foolish to discount him so quickly.
I can't believe America would be ready for another Bush in the White House again.
I still think Carson is the GOPs best chance.
He's actually smart (pediatric neurosurgeon), has a well-known story, he's a minority (a fact which could possibly draw some votes from the middle), believes the government should provide catastrophic health care at the expense of private insurance companies, etc. People like him. He can appeal to the general public. I think this board is foolish to discount him so quickly.
You act like he's never said anything stupid before. He's not gonna pull the black vote just because he's black either. On paper he looks fine, but he's like Christie in that even a modicum of research will show a bunch of issues just waiting to come out and sink him.
You act like he's never said anything stupid before. He's not gonna pull the black vote just because he's black either. On paper he looks fine, but he's like Christie in that even a modicum of research will show a bunch of issues just waiting to come out and sink him.
lol
Carson is an extremist who has largely been insulated by right wing media. Turn him loose amongst the traditional media and he would implode daily. He's smart yet has not introduced a single idea or policy since taking center stage. Because of his lack of experience he'd have to rely on a policy group of advisers, and because the "good" ones will be taken by Christie/Jeb/Walker/Romney/etc, he'll be left with the Heritage Foundation/Gingrich bomb throwers.
Jeb Bush wouldn't work solely because of what he'd have to do and say to win the nomination. If not for that sure, I would be concerned.
It just seems people keep throwing the "but he'll say something stupid!" excuse out there and I think that's a mistake. Everybody seems to think he's the next Herman Cain because he's a middle-aged black man.
It just seems people keep throwing the "but he'll say something stupid!" excuse out there and I think that's a mistake. Everybody seems to think he's the next Herman Cain because he's a middle-aged black man.
It just seems people keep throwing the "but he'll say something stupid!" excuse out there and I think that's a mistake. Everybody seems to think he's the next Herman Cain because he's a middle-aged black man.
I don't see Warren running -- it's not quite the right environment.
I do see a Gillibrand/Warren/Klobuchar primary somewhere in the future.
He's already said stupid shit, he's said some really fucked up stuff that should disqualify him but like PD said the right wing media has him pretty well insulated at this point. We aren't talking about hypothetical comments but stuff he has already said. He's like Christie and Walker in that he's pretty well insulated and is kept away from the bigger stages and only brought out on occasion.
No, I think it's because he's already said tons of stupid things. He has many fringe ideas that few people outside of Fox news viewers have heard. Plus he has zero political or foreign policy experience.
Are you familiar with his statements? He's worse than Cain. Including comparing the US under Obama to Nazi Germany...
As a democrat, I think Jeb wouldn't be that bad as president.
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) Soon after taking office, North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory and U.S. Rep. Mark Sanford of South Carolina accepted six-figure stock payouts from an online mortgage broker accused by regulators of deceiving its customers.
The two Republicans served as directors at Tree.com, the Charlotte-based corporate parent of the website LendingTree. As board members, they were entitled to large chunks of restricted company stock if they held their positions long enough. Both resigned after their election victories, which would have rendered their unvested stock worthless had the board not taken special action to provide them early payouts.
McCrory and Sanford deny they did anything improper by accepting the stock payouts, which were not fully described in their ethics statements. Their timing and total value are only being revealed now, as the result of an Associated Press investigation into the company's financial records and interviews with Tree.com officials.
Early vesting of restricted shares for departing directors is not unheard of in the corporate world.
However, more than a dozen securities lawyers and ethics experts told the AP that such stock payouts are uncommon for elected officials, and raise significant concerns. These experts gave differing opinions about whether laws were broken.
In the months after receiving his $171,071 payout of stock from Tree.com, McCrory appointed the state's banking director and a majority of the banking commissioners who regulate mortgage brokers.
McCrory spokesman Josh Ellis said there was nothing irregular about that.
"There's absolutely no conflict and nothing improper about these appointments," he said.
Some of Tree.com's payments to McCrory and Sanford weren't publicly disclosed until May 2014, when the company filed its 2013 year-end proxy statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Other details such as the fact that Sanford received his $108,539 in Tree.com stock after taking office in Congress have never been made public until now.
In a vacuum, probably not. But him combined with an absolutely insane like a Republican congress? That's another matter.