Aaron Strife
Banned
Why not both?see the above. I don't need a map that's biased in favor of democratic districts, vulnerable to a veto- I need one that's balanced and reverses the damage done in 2010. population and demographic shifts will take care of the rest. all things considered I prefer to rely on high turnout in 2020 leading to more D congressmen to draw the map, than D governors to try and bargain one via veto.
.jpg
I think you're severely underestimating the power of the veto pen here.
Also, the state legislature elections in 2020 will still be based on the 2010 maps. There's no guarantee that demographic shifts will allow Democrats to pick up key state legislatures. Look at Michigan in 2012. Democrats won 54% of the two-party vote to Republicans' 46% in the House, an 8 point margin. The result? Republicans won an 8 seat majority. Democrats even won the popular vote in 2014 and they lost seats.
Yes, obviously empowering the minorities (and maybe even flipping chambers) is important. So is winning the governor's elections.