• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2015-2016 |OT3| If someone named PhoenixDark leaves your party, call the cops

Status
Not open for further replies.

danm999

Member
Yeah I get that he's probably not gaining or losing many followers on the basis of those petty rants but shit if he were ever to become POTUS would he spend half his day calling people out on Twitter?
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
I'm starting to feel the Trump dream die. Iowa will definitely go to Cruz and New Hampshire will probably go to Rubio. Sigh.
 

Hexa

Member
I'm starting to feel the Trump dream die. Iowa will definitely go to Cruz and New Hampshire will probably go to Rubio. Sigh.

The dream will never die.

BUtdwxU.jpg
 

gaugebozo

Member
Yeah I get that he's probably not gaining or losing many followers on the basis of those petty rants but shit if he were ever to become POTUS would he spend half his day calling people out on Twitter?

@WhiteHouse said:
Look at these White House Easter egg roll losers. Total disaster! Pres. Trump much more respected egg finder.
.
 
This particular poll has Trump polling steady from October (actually gaining two points). The big difference now is Cruz on top instead of Carson. It seems like Trump has a solid base in Iowa, but that probably won't be enough to win him the state.

imrs.php


Washington Post also brought up the point that the outsider candidates now have 66% of the vote, compared to 59% in October and 54% in August.
 

Holmes

Member
One of my big pet peeves when it comes to presidential primaries is this weird assumption that a candidate winning Iowa will help propel them in New Hampshire. It didn't happen in 2008 for Democrats and Republicans, and it didn't happen in 2012 for Republicans. It won't happen in 2016 if Cruz wins Iowa. He'll still get fourth or fifth in the state.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
I would rather be beneath Carson, who is barely actually running a campaign, than Cruz, whose support is probably real and will go vote.
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
One of my big pet peeves when it comes to presidential primaries is this weird assumption that a candidate winning Iowa will help propel them in New Hampshire. It didn't happen in 2008 for Democrats and Republicans, and it didn't happen in 2012 for Republicans. It won't happen in 2016 if Cruz wins Iowa. He'll still get fourth or fifth in the state.

Yeah but Trump could use the momentum to solidify NH.

It's the same people who supported Carson who are now supporting Cruz now, though.

But Cruz will actually get them to the polls. He'll have an actual GOTY campaign.
 
So I think this DMR poll with Cruz on top is an outlier. CNN poll is definitely in the realm of a general Trump lead just like countless other polls, which makes it more acceptable. This poll however has Cruz overpolling by 20 points from the trend. Something is definitely off. It could be the start of a Cruz flavor in Iowa. I'm not doubting Cruz' staying power but remember, Carson was leading Iowa for weeks. But we need more polling out of Iowa.
 

Teggy

Member
So I think this DMR poll with Cruz on top is an outlier. CNN poll is definitely in the realm of a general Trump lead just like countless other polls, which makes it more acceptable. This poll however has Cruz overpolling by 20 points from the trend. Something is definitely off. It could be the start of a Cruz flavor in Iowa. I'm not doubting Cruz' staying power but remember, Carson was leading Iowa for weeks. But we need more polling out of Iowa.

The Monmouth poll also has Cruz in the lead.
 

Mike M

Nick N
In an alternate universe where Trump wasn't running, Cruz would have IA on lockdown. I hear stories about how organized Trump is on the ground giving out instruction cards on how to caucus, but I haven't heard anything about Cruz's effort outside of the fact that he's the only other candidate taking things seriously there.

I would expect that the nature of caucuses complicates things more than a primary, I guess?
 
The Monmouth poll also has Cruz in the lead.
It could mean that the Cruz flavor has started. But I really doubt that he doubled his lead over Trump in a week. Carson stayed on top for the entire month of October:

nGxpSUs.png


It will be interesting to see what Trump's strategy would be in taking down Cruz. I think we saw a first glimpse though: "There aren't a lot of evangelicals from Cuba"
 

NeoXChaos

Member
There is no need for Trump to take out Cruz. Either one are satisfying nominees for Hilldawg. Trump & Cruz are tag team duos against the establishment.
 

Ecotic

Member
Huckabee has got to be kicking himself. He had a cushy job with Fox News that brought him influence, connections, and a fat paycheck and now he can't get 4% in Iowa. He got lulled in by those 2014 polls showing him near the top of the pack.
 
Cenk (from TYT), did get to interview Bernie, in 2011, when he was host on MSNBC, and they both were on quite good form (again, I've skipped ahead in the video, but, you may want to rewind to get the full context):



I'm still scratching my head as to why TYT's support for Bernie, since the first Democratic debate, back in October, has gone completely off the boil, and when a Trump supporter said (TYT video link):

We've got people in positions of power who I know, for a fact, are liers, liers. My President comes on the TV, and he lies to me. I know he's lying; he lies all the time. I don't believe anyone of them. Not one. I believe Donald. I'm telling you, he sais what I'm thinking ... he's resonating with the people and is speaking our minds."

Cenk's response was:

Does the President lie about certain things? Of course! So, my guess is, she and I would disagree on which of the politicians lie more, but they're all politicians, they're all lying, to some degree, if not to an enormous degree.

For the remaining two minutes of the video, I was waiting for Cenk to justly single out Bernie, as an exception, but my wait was in vain :(; Bernie snubbed TYT for an interview, confirmed ;).

Despite the false impression given by that Polifact chart, that Hillary doesn't deserve to lumped in with all the other "politicians" (don't make me laugh; “Hillary Clinton has more gates than a south Texas cattle ranch.” (yes, I know that was LaPierre), e.g, Travelgate (rampant nepotism), Pardongate (freeing suspected FALN terrorists), etc, etc), I have seen absolutely nothing to suggest that Bernie is nothing but, an extremely dedicated, and truly honest politician, and, without doubt, "You are our only hope!".
 

Mario

Sidhe / PikPok
I really wish some of these losers would quit already. What the fuck is Pataki still hoping to accomplish?

To me it seems like everybody on the undercard and down apart from Rand isn't actually running for the Presidency. Hanging in there at this stage has got to be about profile and future book/speaking/commentator deals.

However, while that may have been a thing in past cycles, it doesn't seem like that is really going to be the case this time around. The field has just been too crowded from the outset, and Trump has monopolized the media. Very few people have had their time in the sun like the merry-go-round we had last time. As you say, most of them just look like losers.

I'd say the only ones coming out of this primary actually better off than when they started, regardless of outcome are Trump, Cruz, and Carson. Carson by a long shot too, in terms of where he started from. He'll be selling more books and making more awkward mumbling speeches for years to come.
 

Holmes

Member
I don't think I fully understand Daniel B's latest post. If someone can make a Sparknotes version that'd be cool, then again I don't exactly care enough that I really need one.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
I think Rand had high hopes for presidency because it has been pretty clear that the party is too old and will need new direction soon and he was setting himself to be that new direction whether that be 2016 or 2020 or 2024. Unfortunately for him, its seeming like the party is moving the exact opposite direction towards fascism instead of libertarianism, and it's honestly shocking he can't find even 5% of republicans to support his libertarian style.

I did once think that Rand's style was the future of the party, but when the realignment does happen, it'd probably look more like Bill Maher than the Pauls.
 
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
So I think this DMR poll with Cruz on top is an outlier. CNN poll is definitely in the realm of a general Trump lead just like countless other polls, which makes it more acceptable. This poll however has Cruz overpolling by 20 points from the trend. Something is definitely off. It could be the start of a Cruz flavor in Iowa. I'm not doubting Cruz' staying power but remember, Carson was leading Iowa for weeks. But we need more polling out of Iowa.

Honestly, I'd just go with Selzer. At least with them, you know outliers are statistical noise rather than terrible sampling a la Monmouth.
 

Makai

Member
I think Rand had high hopes for presidency because it has been pretty clear that the party is too old and will need new direction soon and he was setting himself to be that new direction whether that be 2016 or 2020 or 2024. Unfortunately for him, its seeming like the party is moving the exact opposite direction towards fascism instead of libertarianism, and it's honestly shocking he can't find even 5% of republicans to support his libertarian style.

I did once think that Rand's style was the future of the party, but when the realignment does happen, it'd probably look more like Bill Maher than the Pauls.
Yeah, I remember everyone thinking he would do well because he would get his dad's supporters plus establishment support. Nope, everybody abandoned him.
 

Bowdz

Member
I saw Rubio was sniping Trump this morning again. I sincerely hope Trump unleashes some attacks on Rubio before the primary is over. Damaging Rubio is priority number one in my mind.
 

Bowdz

Member
The Cruz rise is certainly real. I'm curious to see if Trump will savage Cruz or be content to lose Iowa and take NH.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Hillary v. Cruz would be hilarious.
 
Cruz is just this cycle's santogrich. Chillax dudes.

I think Rand had high hopes for presidency because it has been pretty clear that the party is too old and will need new direction soon and he was setting himself to be that new direction whether that be 2016 or 2020 or 2024. Unfortunately for him, its seeming like the party is moving the exact opposite direction towards fascism instead of libertarianism, and it's honestly shocking he can't find even 5% of republicans to support his libertarian style.

I did once think that Rand's style was the future of the party, but when the realignment does happen, it'd probably look more like Bill Maher than the Pauls.

Id guess that a large part of Rand's problem is simply that he's an asshole. RuPaul, dried prune that he was, had a whole lot of charisma. He was this nice, funny, approachable old man that went to leftie shows and managed to make people simply like him. Not so with the son.
 

Tarkus

Member
Hillary v. Cruz would be hilarious.
Not in a debate. Cruz is a master debater and would tear her apart. Master as in he was a national champion in undergrad. I think he's the last person you'd want against her on the national stage where voters can be swung based on performance.
 

Makai

Member
The Paul campaign released a statement Saturday night, saying "rounding up should be applied" when CNN chooses the field.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom