Daniel B·;190096265 said:
Hillary's email in full:
I thought Jonathan Karl said it best (an awesome start to ABC's debate coverage):
O.k., I ad-libbed with "she got creamed", as I had trouble making out what he was saying, but you get the gist
.
And Matthew Dowd is full of crap:
No, Matthew, he's drawing
all time record crowds, such as the 28k, at his rally in Portland, Oregon, where Obama's best was only 10k (pre-nom)!
So, I think that dispels any question over whether I'm still 100% #FeelingTheBern, and Hillary's sold debate performance just means that
if she gets the nom', it won't feel so much like I'm suckling on a lemon, when I cast my vote in the GE
.
I'm gonna let you in on a little secret.
A campaign that's winning NEVER tells anyone they're winning. The campaign that's losing, those are the ones who tell you that, in the metrics that matter, they're kicking ass. Of course, the only metrics that matter are the ones in which they're doing well.
I'm happy to provide you with a plethora of emails from 2012 where Obama, the DNC and everyone else, let me know that without my $5, Romney would be the next President. It's called fundraising.
Also, great poll to pick from in this point in 2007. Let's look at a few others.
Rasmussen
Hillary Clinton 38%, Barack Obama 27%, John Edwards 13%
Reuters
Hillary Clinton 40%, Barack Obama 32%, John Edwards 13%, Bill Richardson 3%, Joe Biden 3%, Chris Dodd 1%
USA Today/Gallup
Hillary Clinton 33%, Barack Obama 33%, John Edwards 20%, Dennis Kucinich 3%, Bill Richardson 1%
Or what about a few Iowa Polls?
Obama 27%, Clinton 27%, Edwards 22%, Richardson 8%, Biden 5%
Obama 33%, Clinton 29%, Edwards 20%, Richardson 8%, Biden 4%, Kucinich 1%, Dodd 1%, No opinion 3%
Obama 30%, Clinton 29%, Edwards 28%, Biden 5%, Richardson 2%, Dodd 1%, Kucinich 1%, Undecided 4%
(These were from early-late December 2007).
And today?
Hillary's spread is, on average, nearly 15%.
2016 is not 2008.
The same dynamics are not in play. It's not even close.