Bam Bam Baklava
Member
People really hate Jeb Bush.
"I'm just a die-hard Republican," she said.
By Supporters you mean his wife, right? Pretty sure it's his only supporter..
So, basically, the only people who aren't corporate shrills are the people who have endorsed Bernie Sanders. Everyone else is part of the problem.
But, again, that's not what I asked you. What I asked you was that when the election is over, and IF Hillary wins will you admit that Democrats did not agree that Bernie Sanders was the best choice for President? Will you admit that they just didn't Feel the Bern.
in the south, poor whites vote for social issues or don't vote at all. Even issues that who they vote for has no control over.
The notion that the 'moocher" is a single black woman with 8 kids is incorrect. The average poor southerner is a white family with 2-3 children struggling to pay their bills despite working 1 or 2 jobs each. And they harm themselves with these votes.
It's definitely the conclusion I would have guessed, just not quite to that extent. I didn't think the correlation would hold quite as much.
Welp, my totally not joke bet candidate dropped out. I will take any shameful avatar for the next three months that the community bestows upon me.
I think PD was the first real loser, even if that predated the game starting.Game Over Aaron and Retro. You are the first casualties of the game.
Welp, my totally not joke bet candidate dropped out. I will take any shameful avatar for the next three months that the community bestows upon me.
proof voters are morons:
edit: This should be a lesson to Dems.
1. Medicaid/Obamacare is not driving these votes.
2. What is driving these votes are the social policies of this country moving left and it's a protest vote.
Ignoring the Walker stans that died before the thing even started.Game Over Aaron and Retro. You are the first casualties of the game.
Another way to look at it is Darwinism In Action.
Ignoring the Walker stans that died before the thing even started.
I don't use the FaceBook or the Twitter, but looking at my SO's FaceBook wall, all of the Conservatives are only "liking" the Governors refusing refugees while keeping quiet. All of the Liberals have pretty good zingers. "I thought #AllLivesMatter!" lmao
Sucks that my Governor is on that list.
It's ok, you can confess that you were the one that sent in that confession nowSorry guys I was playing fallout 4 what'd I mis-
oh fuck me.
@RupertMurdoch said:No candidate with good foreign policy record available. Need for one with character, strength and determination.
I don't use the FaceBook or the Twitter, but looking at my SO's FaceBook wall, all of the Conservatives are only "liking" the Governors refusing refugees while keeping quiet. All of the Liberals have pretty good zingers. "I thought #AllLivesMatter!" lmao
Sucks that my Governor is on that list.
It's ok, you can confess that you were the one that sent in that confession now
So the people who voted for McCain and Romney will turn out for Bernie too? Cuz that is what is required for "droves."
The issue isn't whether long time democrats will vote for him. They will. Everyone here that is a Democrat will. The problem is he won't bring in as many swing voters and soft voters. And swing voters are generally morons, so don't act like Bernie can magically convince them.
And yes, a huge chunk of our population are against granting free college education regardless of income. For fuck suck's, many Republicans think Obama is a Muslim. Do you not realize how illiterate our voters are?
Daniel B·;185867597 said:Haven't you heard? There are indeed some moderate Republican voters, who are just as fed up with crony-capitalism etc as progressives and would indeed vote for Bernie, if he were the nominee.
I'm happy to say that if the Republican voters end up nominating the clown, that is Donald Trump, or they go ultra-right, with Ben Carson, it will likely be the easiest Presidential win, for Bernie, in living memory (money won't be an issue; the American people, collectively, have deep pockets). If Hillary gets the nomination, all bets are off, and Trump could swing it. I think she could comfortably beat Carson.
Daniel B·;185867597 said:Haven't you heard? There are indeed some moderate Republican voters, who are just as fed up with crony-capitalism etc as progressives and would indeed vote for Bernie, if he were the nominee.
Daniel B·;185867597 said:Haven't you heard? There are indeed some moderate Republican voters, who are just as fed up with crony-capitalism etc as progressives and would indeed vote for Bernie, if he were the nominee.
I'm happy to say that if the Republican voters end up nominating the clown, that is Donald Trump, or they go ultra-right, with Ben Carson, it will likely be the easiest Presidential win, for Bernie, in living memory (money won't be an issue; the American people, collectively, have deep pockets). If Hillary gets the nomination, all bets are off, and Trump could swing it (if he isn't Hillary's plant ). I think she could comfortably beat Carson.
I usually say this to that guy with the crazy looking head avatar from the infamous Hillary/Bernie threads but you need to come to grips with the current political reality.
Welp, my totally not joke bet candidate dropped out. I will take any shameful avatar for the next three months that the community bestows upon me.
Daniel B·;185867597 said:Haven't you heard? There are indeed some moderate Republican voters, who are just as fed up with crony-capitalism etc as progressives and would indeed vote for Bernie, if he were the nominee.
I'm happy to say that if the Republican voters end up nominating the clown, that is Donald Trump, or they go ultra-right, with Ben Carson, it will likely be the easiest Presidential win, for Bernie, in living memory (money won't be an issue; the American people, collectively, have deep pockets). If Hillary gets the nomination, all bets are off, and Trump could swing it (if he isn't Hillary's plant ). I think she could comfortably beat Carson.
Avatarize that
No they don't. Let them dream.
And make bets while you can.
No. They need a crash course in reality. Stakes are very high this time. We could be looking at worse case 35+ Governorships with up to 28 unified Republican controlled states plus a unified Republican federal government and Supreme Court. Brownback will look sane in comparison to what a President Cruz could do with that kind of power.
*Lose MT, MO, WV Govs. Fail to pickup NC
Lamar White, Jr ‏@CenLamar 5m
From a trusted source: 24 elected officials in Jefferson Parish will endorse John Bel Edwards tomorrow. 13 Republicans. Vitter's home.
No. They need a crash course in reality. Stakes are very high this time. We could be looking at worse case 35+ Governorships with up to 28 unified Republican controlled states plus a unified Republican federal government and Supreme Court. Brownback will look sane in comparison to what a President Cruz could do with that kind of power.
*Lose MT, MO, WV Govs. Fail to pickup NC & LA. Lose KY state Senate.
This is a great headline for running-out the clock. If the pacing of these announcements is the Edwards campaign's handiwork, they're doing a great job at making positive headlines every few news cycles.
To be honest, I'm not really sure why it took so long. It's lingered in the background.I don't get it. He had these problems years ago. Why are they sinking him now when they did not in 2007 & 2010? These same people likely reelected him.
I went in a slightly different directionI'd love to live in your head for a day.
To be honest, I'm not really sure why it took so long. It's lingered in the background.
It does seem like Edwards is much less hesitant to outright attack along this line of approach - and his public image as an all-american military guy makes him the perfect guy to make these kinds of attacks. Vitter's last election was for Senate in 2010 - the year that the GOP freaked-out about losing to Obama in 2008 - and his opponent wasn't able to mount such on-target attacks.
Bobby Jindal also hadn't weighed-down the GOP brand statewide either. The environment just seems really different.. a perfect storm, really.
It's a combination of everything, I think. Jindal being terrible, Vitter being terrible, Edwards being great, (very) slight turn blue, Obama derangement syndrome probably cooling off, decent economy/Obamacare situation.I would say there's definitely the Jindal effect at work, but also that JBE is just a good candidate.
It's a combination of everything, I think. Jindal being terrible, Vitter being terrible, Edwards being great, (very) slight turn blue, Obama derangement syndrome probably cooling off, decent economy/Obamacare situation.
Not enough to sink Grimes or Beshear, at least.alive and well as of a week ago in KY.
Now it's retro's turn.I went in a slightly different direction
Holllly....So, now Unions who don't endorse Bernie Sanders are part of the corporate, neo-liberal wing of the Democratic Party!? Unions? We've now reached the point where Unions are part of the problem. In a Democratic Primary. Is this real life? Is this just fantasy?
So, basically, the only people who aren't corporate shrills are the people who have endorsed Bernie Sanders. Everyone else is part of the problem. If Bernie has this huge majority of people supporting him....how come he doesn't have a majority of the Progressives in Congress? How about a single governor? A single Senator? A single state party chair? A majority of unions?
I have never seen anyone question Bernie's integrity. However, an election isn't a "Lets all hold hands and love each other" thing. If you think any criticisms of Sanders are attacks on his integrity....you're in for a world of hurt should he make it into the General. Pointing out that Bernie is wrong on something is not an attack on him as a person. It's showing that, and I know this may be surprising.....he's human. It's totally possible he's completely wrong on something. And it's okay! Hillary's wrong on things sometimes, too.
And, no, I don't think the Democratic party will be fully behind him.Will I vote for him? Absolutely. I also think it's funny that you think Bernie Sanders could "do" anything to someone in the party. He caucuses with us because we want him to. He has no power or say within the party at all. Zero. (Which is part of the reason he has so many issues trying to win.)
But, again, that's not what I asked you. What I asked you was that when the election is over, and IF Hillary wins will you admit that Democrats did not agree that Bernie Sanders was the best choice for President? Will you admit that they just didn't Feel the Bern.
For the sake of planet Earth and all its inhabitants, I am hoping, with every fibre of my being, that you are utterly wrong.I will, right now, unequivocally say that if Hillary loses, then I was wrong. I was completely wrong.
Lmao. Can't win them all!Sorry guys I was playing fallout 4 what'd I mis-
oh fuck me.
Hah hah.I went in a slightly different direction
Daniel B·;185877347 said:Based on peer reviewed, scientific data, as I haven't received a single friendly toot, from a passing motorist, clearly Bernie doesn't yet "have a huge majority of people supporting him" (your words), but we have months left yet, to spread the good word .
Seriously though, don't you think it's a problem, when a union unilaterally decides to endorse a Presidential candidate, without conducting a national ballot and also, doing so long before its members have had a chance to become fully acquainted with all the candidates? Is that too much to ask from ones union, is this day and age?
My point was that, I don't see Democrats having any trouble voting for Bernie, the happily maried, for 28 years, father and grandfather of seven (oh, I'm good ), a man of unquestionable character, who has dedicated a good part of his life to the betterment of his fellow American.
It's not Bernie who will show the door to someone in the party, who would vote against significant parts of his proposals, it's the American people!
If Bernie's supporters, me included, do everything that is asked of us (I draw the line at donating a kidney) and the American people reject the chance to put our once great nation, back on the right course, then I will live in hope, that in my lifetime, another champion emerges, who seeks the high office of President of the United States, for merely the chance to faithfully serve all Americans, our precious planet and all future generations.
For the sake of planet Earth and all its inhabitants, I am hoping, with every fibre of my being, that you are utterly wrong.
Powered by PS3 (Slim - my Phat got the YLOD's) .
No. They need a crash course in reality. Stakes are very high this time. We could be looking at worse case 35+ Governorships with up to 28 unified Republican controlled states plus a unified Republican federal government and Supreme Court. Brownback will look sane in comparison to what a President Cruz could do with that kind of power.
*Lose MT, MO, WV Govs. Fail to pickup NC & LA. Lose KY state Senate.
Daniel B·;185877347 said:Based on peer reviewed, scientific data, as I haven't received a single friendly toot, from a passing motorist, clearly Bernie doesn't yet "have a huge majority of people supporting him" (your words), but we have months left yet, to spread the good word .
Seriously though, don't you think it's a problem, when a union unilaterally decides to endorse a Presidential candidate, without conducting a national ballot and also, doing so long before its members have had a chance to become fully acquainted with all the candidates? Is that too much to ask from ones union, in this day and age?
My point was that, I don't see Democrats having any trouble voting for Bernie, the happily maried, for 28 years, father and grandfather of seven (oh, I'm good ), a man of unquestionable character, who has dedicated a good part of his life to the betterment of his fellow American.
It's not Bernie who will show the door to someone in the party, who would vote against significant parts of his proposals, it's the American people!
If Bernie's supporters, me included, do everything that is asked of us (I draw the line at donating a kidney) and the American people reject the chance to put our once great nation, back on the right course, then I will live in hope, that in my lifetime, another champion emerges, who seeks the high office of President of the United States, for merely the chance to faithfully serve all Americans, our precious planet and all future generations.
For the sake of planet Earth and all its inhabitants, I am hoping, with every fibre of my being, that you are utterly wrong.
Powered by PS3 (Slim - my Phat got the YLOD's) .
Avatarize that