Most print journalism are also available in web format. So I mean NY Times, The Guardian, WaPo, The Daily Beast, WSJ, whatever, just pick whichever you feel best represents the truth according to your best judgment. Nobody can fix television because it suffers from incentive problems.
If only there was someone here who could recap the news every week, minus the fluff.
Well I think there is market for good, hard journalism. Jon Stewart, Colbert and John Oliver have done more for journalism than the clowns in the 24 hr news media. Of course they infuse humor to the story and that's one of the reasons why they are successful, but I dont know if incentivizing a truth based coverage is a good start. And fuck the panel format.
Dead Heat was a good start. It never took off because it was mostly just a bunch of opinions from internet nobodies. People spoke their passion pieces and once it was off their chest they did not come back. But the content, if yoh read it, was really good. But what I'm talking about right now is lets revive Walter Cronkite from his grave for half an hour a day (or for an hour once a week).
There is a difference between having a good story and having coverage of every story, ever. Every once in a while John Oliver drills into an asshole for 20 minutes. Cute, but real journalism is about getting as much of the facts out there as possible. You think Jon Stewart isn't reading the NY Times?
I dont even know what you're arguing.
I don't know what you're arguing! You said there's a market for good, hard, journalism and then said Jon Stewart did more for journalism than anyone ever did. I think that's a weird thing to say when the comedy news format is "pick something obviously ridiculous and drill baby drill for 10 minutes". That's a fine niche but it's not better journalism than mainstream outlets considering those institutions are managing finite resources and trying to cover, like, everything, while John Oliver can pick anything that pisses him off, manufacture one story with lots of arm waving, and then be done for the week.
Jon Stewart catches pundits, hosts and surrogates saying insane shit and goes to work. He's not a journalist, but he's doing the work of one! I used him as an example to illustrate the fact that watching half an hour of his show will give you more reality dosage than watching daily clown show in news, not that we want a clone of his show. John Oliver manufactures outrage over facts, and nothing is wrong with that. I want a program to report news and deliver facts, not perceived facts or hearsay, in cold manner. I dont know why you're so opposed to this novel idea? I'm not saying start a news channel with its own reporters, jeez. This is why the term truthiness is genius. Media pursues truthiness because it feels real, but it isnt. It drives narratives and brings the ratings.
>5.0 tflops or no deal Sony.
The real issue is her risk of DVT/pulmonary embolism from all these flights.
I need 1080p/60 in my life for all games. The rumored 4.2 tflops wouldn't be able to reach this on many games.
What's the difference between news and facts? Aren't facts an essential part of any "news story"? I think what you want is more fact checking. And you especially want more crossfire network-to-network fact checking with callouts, like Keith Olbermann or Rachel Maddow do.
Rubio is (?)
You still want to ban abortion, defund planned parenthood, neuter Obamacare, and cut welfare spending.
That's what he wants to do, not I. His Catholic-inspired policies were deplorable.You still want to ban abortion, defund planned parenthood, neuter Obamacare, and cut welfare spending.
Also this is your candidate back when he was a twink HOW DO YOU RESPOND?
DJT
Are we sure that's not little Marco?Everybody has a little gay in them
