Lol now she's mad people are throwing MLK back at her and she's pissed.
Robert Byrd? Lol these clowns
I feel like this was her best speech of the campaign. At least right there with the South Carolina primary speech.
I feel like this was her best speech of the campaign. At least right there with the South Carolina primary speech.
Would be nice if people pointed out that he denounced his previous support for the KKK and spent the rest of his life fighting for Civil Righs. He's voted to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act, something not a single Republican would do today.
@daveweigel 36m36 minutes ago
Gary Johnson to Union Leader: "If it's the zombie apocalypse, and herd immunity exists, as president I'm going to order a mass vaccination."
#strongleadership
I may be in the minority here - but she sucks at soaring language imho. This is her wheelhouse.Eh, for me the points were good but it's not the kind of speech that I would consider good or great oratory. It was methodical and strong but nothing soared and her delivery was worse than it has been in the past, maybe because its not the kind of speech that inspires.
The money must be good to go on CNN and get clowned everyday
I notice this post makes no mention of all the starving children around the world. Decent post, but you really must try harder.
The future of The New York TimesCBS News poll, one of America's oldest and most influential public opinion polls, is up in the air.
At issue is the departure, after the 2016 election, of the Times' remaining veteran pollsters who worked with CBS. Two of them, Megan Thee-Brenan and Dalia Sussman, recently took voluntary buyout packages and will leave the Times at the end of the year. Another, former polling director Marjorie Connelly, who had worked in the unit for more than 20 years, took a buyout in 2014. CBS has indicated privately, according to a source familiar with the matter, that it is only interested in working with experienced, traditional pollsters at the Times.
Sources said CBS and the Times have not had any formal conversations about dissolving the 41-year-old partnership, which was the first such collaboration between two major U.S. news organizations. But there is growing speculation that they will go their separate ways after the election.
Reached by phone Wednesday afternoon, CBS polling director Sarah Dutton did not have a comment. Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy said, "We remain committed, as we have always been, to high quality public opinion research and it's something that is being considered as we work on envisioning our future newsroom."
With the surge in cell phone usage and the increasing obsolescence of landlines in recent years, telephone polls, which are considered more reliable than web-based polls, have become more costly and time-consuming to conduct. At the same time, newsroom budgets have come under pressure due to the digital-media transition that has disrupted newspapers and television networks alike.
Created in 1976, the NYTCBS operation is considered one of the gold-standard media polls, along with two other TV-newspaper polling partnerships: The Washington Post-ABC News poll and The Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll. Those three polls, along with CNN and Fox News, are the ones being used by the Commission on Presidential Debates to determine inclusion in the general election face-offs this fall.
The Times is under significant pressure to find cost savings and has also been conducting a strategic review of its newsroom. The polling unit has already seen changes over the past few years. It contracted out its call center in 2013 and had a short-lived merger with the Times' data-journalism operation, The Upshot, that didn't work out due to friction between the two teams.
I may be in the minority here - but she sucks at soaring language imho. This is her wheelhouse.
I cant comment on his views, because his views are they seem to be ever, ever-changing, depending on what crowd hes in front of. Sounds like a typical politician, by the way, where you get in front of one crowd and say one thing, and then say something else to another crowd that may want to hear a different view. All the things that Donald Trump railed against, he seems to be morphing into its kind of disturbing.
He doesnt believe in things, this is all a game, added Bush.
I may be in the minority here - but she sucks at soaring language imho. This is her wheelhouse.
They do mention that. They mentioned it to her last night on Anderson Cooper, twice. Doesn't stop her from saying it each and every segment.
It's the Trump strategy. Keeping saying lies over and over that the people will eventually get tired of fact checking you.
I may be in the minority here - but she sucks at soaring language imho. This is her wheelhouse.
Christopher Hayes
@chrislhayes
White supremacists respond to Hillary's speech, w/ basically. "She's right. We are SUPER RACIST"
3:05pm · 25 Aug 2016 · Twitter Web Client
Yup. You know those scenes in movies where a dude is like planning out 18 karate moves in his head in advance, and then does a methodical slow-mo/super-speed takedown breaking bones and shit? That was this.Exactly. That's not her manner of speechifying. This is her shit. A methodical and rational take down of something. Rhetoric that applies only to emotions is not the way to present this information.
When I see these charts, I'm like, I could fly through that and be safe at all times.
The airheads on CNN are stupid really. Including Wolf. Only Brianna Keilor, AC and Lemon push back and have facts on hand. She probably didnt even know who Byrd is.Would be nice if people pointed out that he denounced his previous support for the KKK and spent the rest of his life fighting for Civil Righs. He's voted to reauthorize the Voting Rights Act, something not a single Republican would do today.
It's the reason why my buzz gets knocked a bit when she busts out those "GOD BLESS EVERYONE, and GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA" type of moments. Luckily, there was actually very little of that, and just cold, hard facts, delivered by a goddamn adult.
Exactly. That's not her manner of speechifying. This is her shit. A methodical and rational take down of something. Rhetoric that applies only to emotions is not the way to present this information.
Yup. You know those scenes in movies where a dude is like planning out 18 karate moves in his head in advance, and then does a methodical slow-mo/super-speed takedown breaking bones and shit? That was this.
It's one of the reasons she's so fucking dangerous in a debate. Because this is how her brain works. Soaring rhetoric...no.
When I see these charts, I'm like, I could fly through that and be safe at all times.
Kayleigh on CNN: "If my candidate is a racist, why did they go to his wedding?"
lol, great argument, Kayleigh.
Fuckin' hate CNN and their 6 people panel segments.
/rant
LolKayleigh on CNN: "If my candidate is a racist, why did they go to his wedding?"
lol, great argument, Kayleigh.
The fact that Kingston never closes his mouth bothers me a lot. His mouth is always half open, and the way his head tilts bothers me too.
The Alt-Right responds to Hillary's speech:
"Yes, we are Nazis, absolutely, 100%"