Vestal
Junior Member
I think Trump had probably just watched Blade.
Did not include entire image, since it can be deemed umm... Sexually explicit?
Next she'll photoshop herself into the swearing-in ceremony and will spend the next four years having cabinet meetings at a table full of stuffed animals.
I don't understand the vitriol toward the third party candidates in here. Every presidential cycle has them and they're not going away. At least Johnson and Stein aren't shitbag racist xenophobes like Trump.
newsweek cover
When Trump's lawyer threatened us on #TrumpInCuba, saying docs didnt exist, @Newsweek offered to post em all online. Kurt EichenwaldVerified account ‏@kurteichenwald 40m.
I mean, of course she would! Of course.Dr. Jill Stein says she would have answered Jeremy Corbyn in Johnson's place.
It looks like they're saving the receipts for the inevitable fallout:
I don't understand the vitriol toward the third party candidates in here. Every presidential cycle has them and they're not going away. At least Johnson and Stein aren't shitbag racist xenophobes like Trump.
I don't understand the vitriol toward the third party candidates in here. Every presidential cycle has them and they're not going away. At least Johnson and Stein aren't shitbag racist xenophobes like Trump.
Trump apparently lawyered up about the Newsweek/Cuba story (which is causing it to trend on Twitter now).
Colorado +6
Clinton 46, Trump 40, Johnson 6, Stein 2
Florida +2
Clinton 45, Trump 43, Johnson 3, Stein 1
North Carolina +2
Clinton 44, Trump 42, Johnson 7
Pennsylvania +6
Clinton 45, Trump 39, Johnson 6, Stein 2
Virginia +6
Clinton 46, Trump 40, Johnson 7, Stein 1
Trump apparently lawyered up about the Newsweek/Cuba story (which is causing it to trend on Twitter now).
Trump organization executives and advisers traveled to Havana in late 2012 or early 2013, according to two people familiar with the discussions that took place in Cuba
Dr. Jill Stein says she would have answered Jeremy Corbyn in Johnson's place.
That's from July.
I don't understand the vitriol toward the third party candidates in here. Every presidential cycle has them and they're not going away. At least Johnson and Stein aren't shitbag racist xenophobes like Trump.
ClinTrump supporters? I do not want to be put in the basket of deplorables
Also, we prefer "Trumptons".
Oh oops. Somebody must've retweeted it now because it's relevant againThat's from July.
I don't understand the vitriol toward the third party candidates in here. Every presidential cycle has them and they're not going away. At least Johnson and Stein aren't shitbag racist xenophobes like Trump.
What's wrong with this one?No OT thread on the train in Hoboken?
I have no problem with it, it's not sketchy. Other than Hillary herself doesn't want to give them the benefit of mentioning them so it's left to the single creepiest person inside the Clinton circle in David Brock.If I was Hillary and didn't want 3rd parties handing Trump the presidency, I'd do everything to stop them, too. Whether that stuff is sketchy or not, I dunno I'd have no idea what the right way to do that is.
These are apt and welcome admissions against ideological interest, motivated explicitly by Trumps moral ugliness and unfitness for the presidency. But their timing is heavily suggestive of a lesson learned too late: that we should be faithful to reality in criticizing ideological foes and not tolerate others efforts to demean and slander them out of convenience.
These editorials, written by experienced conservative journalists, are implicit admissions that the overwhelming majority of horrifying, conspiratorial things conservatives and Republicans have said about Clinton over the yearsfrom accusing her of murdering Vince Foster, to orchestrating and covering up the terrorist attacks in Benghazi, to endangering U.S. national security with her email setuphave been instrumentalist agitprop. Liberals have understood all along that Clintons depiction in right-wing circles is a grotesque caricature. But not everybody has been in on the scam. And its troubling that a true-to-life rendering only emerged now, six weeks before an election in which the very integrity of American democracy is at stake.
Liberals have understood all along that Clintons depiction in right-wing circles is a grotesque caricature.
Are we thinking of the same Ross Perot? The one who dropped out of the race because he said George Bush was going to sabotage his daughters wedding with black ops CIA officers? And never actually picked a VP nominee forcing Admiral Stockdale, a real war hero unlike Johm McCain, to show up and debate on his own with no backing or information from Perot.Guys like Perot were not ridiculous.
I don't know about that just from their past experience. Gary/Weld is two twice-elected blue state governors. Unless I'm forgetting somebody, neither major party has put up two Governors on a ticket since FDR/Garner.Neither third party candidate is qualified at all to be president
Liberals have understood all along that Clintons depiction in right-wing circles is a grotesque caricature.
Liberals have understood all along that Clintons depiction in right-wing circles is a grotesque caricature.
Have they?
I don't know about that just from their past experience. Gary/Weld is two twice-elected blue state governors. Unless I'm forgetting somebody, neither major party has put up two Governors on a ticket since FDR/Garner.
Wait, Dewey/Warren probably.
I'd argue the holdouts in this election prove this is not the case.
Go browse Jill Steins Twitter feed.
Go browse Jill Steins Twitter feed.
Well, sure, he's no Ron Paul or Eisenhower but it's not like there's any other even mediocre standards abound.Johnson has shown no understanding of foreign policy, which is arguably the most important job of the president, considering it's the job he or she has the most freedom to pursue without congress.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features...t-they-need-to-register/?ex_cid=2016-forecast
Missing uneducated white voters could singlehandedly win Trump the election. Like the millennials, white voters without a college degree do not show up in satisfactory numbers for the GOP. And their possible surge is not being reflected in registration data.
This is why a ground game is important.
like i'm going to trust some DNC shillBy David Wasserman
Megyn is too good for Fox News. She should jump to CNN.
I don't have Wi-Fi
Jill Stein's polling isn't out of the ordinary. Johnson's the only one polling outsized by a significant amount compared to the past. Third parties by default tend to poll at 2-4% if they're actually included in polls during the summer. Stein's at ~3-4%. Same as she was in 2012 and McKinney was in 2008. Neither one cracked 0.5% iirc.
Johnson's 8% is more likely to translate to like 2% on election day. Stein should be well under 1%.
Well, sure, he's no Ron Paul or Eisenhower but it's not like there's any other even mediocre standards abound.
like i'm going to trust some DNC shill