It's like all you guys ever do is sit around watching TV to complain or freak out about it. No wonder you're all poor and have to vote Democrat to get all those handouts.
It's just going to make it easier someday for Congress to pass a bill which essentially neuters the Internet as we know it in the name of privacy rights, stopping various forms of abuse, making it harder for terrorists to communicate, etc.
Newt Gingrich said:There's a big Trump and a little Trump. The little Trump is frankly pathetic.
royalan said:I reject the idea that there was no oppo research done, either by the other Republican candidates or Trump himself. To believe that would be to believe that ALL of these people were asleep in American Politics 101.
Bits are bits? No matter where they come from? I beg to differOk but thats not what Net Neutrality is about
I reject the idea that there was no oppo research done, either by the other Republican candidates or Trump himself. To believe that would be to believe that ALL of these people were asleep in American Politics 101.
You know another thing candidates do when they're gathering oppo? They poll. They focus test. To see which attacks are the most effective. What angles they should focus on going against specific opponents.
Trump's predator behavior is well known. I posit that no Republican used it because they saw it wouldn't matter a damn to Republican primary voters. Looking at the state of the country, at polling numbers, his remaining support...yep, sounds about right.
Just booked the day after the election off work, now I can stay up all night for it.
YASSSSSSSSSSS QUEEN
I agree these stories would make no difference in a primary, but the RNC and the campaign should've done oppo for the general, and it seems they didn't. They don't even have a response to the stories.
I did that for the 2004 election. Worked out great!Just booked the day after the election off work, now I can stay up all night for it.
YASSSSSSSSSSS QUEEN
Yaaaaaaaa bae! You better be in chat, or I'm going to be very cross.And I won't let you spank me for being bad.
I did that for the 2004 election. Worked out great!
When you've lost Newt...
Right?Big words there.
Why do they keep calling it "inappropriate" touching in various outlets. And "improper" advances.
It's called sexual assault.
When you've lost Newt...
When you've lost Newt...
Why do news agencies keep summarizing these old leaks as new news? I don't get it. Anyway this stuff is pretty demure.Is this a nothing burger?
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/clin...-hacked-emails/story?id=42749047&cid=abcn_tco
Why is he a shitty surrogate? He does the job of being Trump's mouthpiece and for doing that he cashes his check. Its his job to deflect and shift the blame away. If he said "well yeah Trump sucks", then he's a shitty surrogate.why the fuck is Lewendowski still on CNN? this guy such a shitty surrogate
The last discredited story....with you on tape speaking about assaulting women.
“This entire article is fiction, and for the New York Times to launch a completely false, coordinated character assassination against Mr. Trump on a topic like this is dangerous. To reach back decades in an attempt to smear Mr. Trump trivializes sexual assault, and it sets a new low for where the media is willing to go in its efforts to determine this election.
"It is absurd to think that one of the most recognizable business leaders on the planet with a strong record of empowering women in his companies would do the things alleged in this story, and for this to only become public decades later in the final month of a campaign for president should say it all.
"Further, the Times story buries the pro-Clinton financial and social media activity on behalf of Hillary Clinton’s candidacy, reinforcing that this truly is nothing more than a political attack. This is a sad day for the Times.”
Big words there.
Why do they keep calling it "inappropriate" touching in various outlets. And "improper" advances.
It's called sexual assault. Call a spade a bloody spade.
Why does the actual rape case Trump is involved in get no coverage in the MSM? Is it known to be frivolous?
Why didn't the writer of the twelve year old article in People Magazine mention the "incident" in her story. Because it did not happen!
I reject the idea that there was no oppo research done, either by the other Republican candidates or Trump himself. To believe that would be to believe that ALL of these people were asleep in American Politics 101.
You know another thing candidates do when they're gathering oppo? They poll. They focus test. To see which attacks are the most effective. What angles they should focus on going against specific opponents.
Trump's predator behavior is well known. I posit that no Republican used it because they saw it wouldn't matter a damn to Republican primary voters. Looking at the state of the country, at polling numbers, his remaining support...yep, sounds about right.
Looks like a Trump tweetstorm is coming today
https://youtu.be/sa7jPOlt5w4
This email shit is so annoying, in a bad way. Every fucking thing is being taken out of context and sensationalized to hell and back to be used as a club against Clinton, like the catholic thing which was written BY CATHOLICS to attack Murdoch mostly. But no, now Clinton is against Catholics and evangelicals. Yes, I know Trump is finished, but I want this to be a fucking landslide and this meaningless shit coming out everyday doesn't help.
Yes. It's old news and just breaks down how Clinton may be on friendly terms with bankers but is still wanting to regulate them and will tell them that directly.Is this a nothing burger?
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/clin...-hacked-emails/story?id=42749047&cid=abcn_tco
Seeing the likes in that tweet really makes me angry.yep, going after the People Magazine reporter who said he sexually assaulted her now:
Never mind that she mentioned in the article why she didn't report it at the time.
Seeing the likes in that tweet really makes me angry.
I certainly can't speak for the other Republican candidates, but posters are always wondering how Trump could have run despite all of these things in his past and I think the answer is simple: he doesn't think he did anything wrong.
There was an amazing Frontline episode covering both candidates, sharing stories about them throughout their lives. When they focused on Trump's time at the military academy, they had classmates of his on that said that their sexual education was pretty much pulled out of Playboy magazine. That the greatest (in his mind) honor that Donald Trump received at the academy was being voted "Ladies Man" by his classmates. And these same classmates say that Donald Trump is essentially the same person he was then today. This is a man who has not grown or matured at all in nearly 60 years.
Donald Trump is probably flabbergasted that any of this is happening. Women love me! They love me because I'm rich and famous! I can do anything I want to women because I'm such a Ladies Man. It is like when he brought up Rosie O'Donnell unprompted during the first debate. A lot of people watching thought he was having a meltdown. But in Trump's mind, he's in the right and this is the way women should be treated: beautiful women getassaultedkissed, ugly women get called stupid pigs.
And it's fucking disgusting.
The damage Trump has done to our country is extraordinary. I can't even handle thinking about it too much. I hate him so much.
Just read about the "hang her in the streets" chants at one of his rallies and his doubling down on the special prosecutor thing. I'm just....in shock. This with the imagery of black people being punched and shoved at his rallies just like in the segregated south.........I just can't.
It worries me. It scares me. How can we ever overcome this?