LOL Even Ben Stein said he'd vote Dem over Trump.
That just means that NeoCons love Hillary.
LOL Even Ben Stein said he'd vote Dem over Trump.
Don't forget FL, IL, MO and NC on March 15th. Big AA and Latino populations.
Next Tuesday is the real Super Tuesday! /TYTThe map is incredibly friendly to Bernie going forward.
The map is incredibly friendly to Bernie going forward.
Shorter this poll: "don't you ever show your face around here, Sanders."New Magellan Mississippi poll
Trump 41%
Cruz 17%
Rubio 16%
Kasich 8%
Carson 5%
Undecided 13%
Hillary 65%
Bernie 11%
Most of them. I am happy there wasn't a ton of gloating today.I've just kinda accepted that that's the way things are here and have made peace with it.
They're really not so bad when you get to know them
I was thinking about this earlier when I scanned your post, and while I would like to see numbers showing this shared support from Trump, I generally agree Kasich was the best choice of the group. He's similar to Hillary went it comes to experience.BTW, The establishment fucked up big time and here's how. By not rallying around Kasich. We all pretty much agreed that Kasich probably had the best shot in 2016 against Hillary. I know he's not as moderate as he pretends to be but the perception is that he is moderate. And he would play it that way. And he appears to care about the poor. And he has a good record for a Republican. And he worked in the federal gov't, private sector, media, and state gov't level. His credentials are there. He also ran a more positive campaign and he has often sounded like the adult in the group.
The Republican Establishment is well aware of their problem with minorities. But the Establishment doesn't "get it." Just like they thought by putting Palin out there that "hey we have a woman VP!" being good enough they think having a young Cuban be the face of their party would be good enough. But Rubio is a bad candidate. He's very conservative, he's unpolished, and can't debate for shit. He had to resort to dick jokes against Donald Fucking Drumpf.
Kasich was the only candidate from the very beginning calling Drumpf's positions crazy. His Medicaid expansion also wouldn't have hurt him nearly as much as they thought it would have. Kasich is the only candidate that could have siphoned off Drumpf's support. Think about it. yes, he has a bunch of racists and Kasich wouldn't touch those but that's not all his support. He has a lot of support from the "Drumpf is successful, yay businesman" group, too. It's why he won Massachusetts so easily. It's why Drumpf wins in every demographic or at least gets a good chunk of them. He appeals not just to nativists but also those who aren't super conservative and love business people and people who "gets things done". Kasich would have appealed to some of these folks!
The problem is Kasich got drowned out by the Cruz-Drumpf-Rubio wars since early January.
It's too late now, Kasich has no path to the majority of delegates. The GOP Establishment put their money on Rubio once Jeb! bombed. Partly because he's a minority and young, partly because Kasich expanded medicaid and they bet wrong. Very wrong.
Kasich was the GOP's best hope for Not Drumpf and the GE but they never recognized it and it is now waaaaaay too late. Think about it, had they unified around him in early January, Rubio drops out after NH and the GOP goes on a full on attack on Drumpf for being a racist and Kasich is now the nominee.
Alas...
You have a bad attitude unless you're joking.Shorter this poll: "don't you ever show your face around here, Sanders."
The more things change the more they stay the same.
yeah but Jeb has to go to family functions and know he is the "ain't shit bum " brotherAt least Jeb has the Bush name to fall back on. "Rubio" will become synonymous with malfunctioning robots.
LOL Even Ben Stein said he'd vote Dem over Trump.
So coming up we've got the following states. I'm predicting:
Yeah. I'm joking. It's a joke.You have a bad attitude unless you're joking.
For all the freaking out I do over Cruz, I just remembered that he would have to debate Hillary... She would eat him alive. Hell, I think she'd eat any of the top 3 alive. I just think it would be a hell of a lot easier for her if it was Trump. I'm starting to think Cruz wouldn't be much, if any, harder.
Everything is coming up Sanders in the delegate math. I have proof
The Minnesota caucuses are only an estimated ten percent non-white so you can't get good exit polling based on racial breakdown anyway; but even setting that aside there were no exit polls.
GOP trying to recruit Sleepy Ben for the FL senate race.
http://fortune.com/2016/03/02/ben-carson-senate-florida/
GOP trying to recruit Sleepy Ben for the FL senate race.
http://fortune.com/2016/03/02/ben-carson-senate-florida/
Bernie's totally getting 60% of the vote in Puerto Rico and 100% of the vote in Guam. And he's going to travel back in time and split the American Samoa caucus with Hillary. Because socialism now allows you to ret-con anything you don't like.
Did this originally come from Reddit? I have to find the source and read the comments on it. Please
Someone earlier in the thread posted what is presumed to be the original source.
I think Jeb is coming out better than Rubio.
Jeb never had the false light of being a frontrunner shined on him
Rubio had that and had it snatched away in a 48 hour period.
Inauguration Day. Executive privilege!So is there like a deadline for Hillary getting indicted?
So is there like a deadline for Hillary getting indicted?
More liberal state generally means more liberal voters across all demographics, especially in a place like NH.Now that I think about it, Bernie won the majority of AA voters in New Hampshire as well, which has an even lower population of black people than Minnesota does.
Maybe it has something to do with the ratio between how white/non-white a state is, and how that affects African-American's socio-political circumstances? I don't know, but it's worth looking into.
Because it was Minnesota. Sorry Aaron.Lol I like how big of a deal they were making about him maybe winning Virginia, but then he actually wins a state and no one gives a shit.
You have a different definition of data than I (or most of the world) does.
This is data from a northern state.
As is this.
Now that I think about it, Bernie won the majority of AA voters in New Hampshire as well, which has an even lower population of black people than Minnesota does.
Maybe it has something to do with the ratio between how white/non-white a state is, and how that affects African-American's socio-political circumstances? I don't know, but it's worth looking into.
GOP trying to recruit Sleepy Ben for the FL senate race.
http://fortune.com/2016/03/02/ben-carson-senate-florida/
Florida is where he keeps his clothes.Doesn't Carson live in Maryland?
More liberal state generally means more liberal voters across all demographics, especially in a place like NH.
I say it's more to do with being in a deep Red Republican state with eternal Republican Governors for life as opposed to being in a swing state with liberal college crowds
EDIT: There was no racial breakdown of the NH showing anyone with a majority. The sample is just too small to make inferences.
I kind of wish I had sold Trump at 85 cents just because that would've given me an absurd amount of liquid cash to play around with. Right now I only have $220 to use. But dumping Trump right now makes no sense; his chances look as good as they ever have given the state of his competition.I'm down like $600 because a bunch of idiots decided to dump Trump shares.
Florida went up a little while ago. I managed to buy in at 75c. Should be at 90 after the next poll.
I edited above, but I'll repeat. You can't make good inferences based on exit polling of such small sub-populations; they inherently have higher error. But this is again ignoring that there were no breakdowns released, precisely because the sample was too small to be meaningful.
We're talking about something like 2% of NH electorate. Fool's errand.
Obama hit them lightly on stuff like NAFTA. To my recollection it was all economic.Did the Obama campaign go after the Clinton's on the 90's stuff or they didn't need to due to the IA momentum and Clinton campaign foot in mouth disease?
I'm partial to Clinton's Cuties personally
I love you