jack_package_200
Banned
Ok. Really, really dumb then. Specially because of how close the race is.
Its not a close race tho. After tonight's win, Bernie is still trailing behind.
Edit: Saw you meant for Wisconsin, not the general
Ok. Really, really dumb then. Specially because of how close the race is.
Its not a close race tho. After tonight's win, Bernie is still trailing behind.
Nate Cohn, Dave and Wang are the only one worth listening to. They spout numbers and objective opinions without punditry. Nate Silver on the other hand needs to go back to numbers and data. Stay away from the punditry.
So what happens if he gets to 16%?
He hits one state. Now he has to repeat the same in every single one going forward without missing it once.
He did a good job, but Sanders supporters really have to understand looking forward how hard it will be for him to even come within a 100 delegates of Clinton.
I mean, that is why there are all these Sander campaign surrogates talking "open convention" and "convince super delegates to vote for us over Clinton" talk. A 180 from what, a month ago?
So what happens if he gets to 16%?
Bernie says we'll pass gay marriage in all 50 states in this country.
Which. Like.
Should we tell him?
Mess. I hate Nate.
It means Clinton's still going to win, but that Clinton is a super weak candidate and would be in trouble if the GOP wasn't trotting out their Washington Generals this election?
I have no idea if his comment had this much nuance in it - but you all do realize that passing gay marriage as legislative acts in this country in each state would be significantly better than Obergefell, right? SCOTUS rulings that functionally pass laws are baaasically the worst case scenario in a given situation when you actually sit down and do the analysis for the way this country reacts.
He hits one state. Now he has to repeat the same in every single one going forward without missing it once.
He did a good job, but Sanders supporters really have to understand looking forward how hard it will be for him to even come within a 100 delegates of Clinton.
I mean, that is why there are all these Sander campaign surrogates talking "open convention" and "convince super delegates to vote for us over Clinton" talk. A 180 from what, a month ago?
It means Clinton's still going to win, but that Clinton is a super weak candidate and would be in trouble if the GOP wasn't trotting out their Washington Generals this election?
I still don't get how the supporters expect the superdelegates to vote for him. He has not been making friends with the DNC. They aren't going to switch their votes just because you asked.
I'm so fucking mad about Bradley. FUCK. What is the point of your fucking revolution if you don't vote in the fucking downticket elections you fucks.
B-dubs and Makai
Do you want to try to hit up the Nightly Show sometime soon? The one with larry wilmore
and Adam, you promised your gamertage today. I need to add you.
It means Clinton's still going to win, but that Clinton is a super weak candidate and would be in trouble if the GOP wasn't trotting out their Washington Generals this election?
I have no idea if his comment had this much nuance in it - but you all do realize that passing gay marriage as legislative acts in this country in each state would be significantly better than Obergefell, right? SCOTUS rulings that functionally pass laws are baaasically the worst case scenario in a given situation when you actually sit down and do the analysis for the way this country reacts.
I still don't get how the supporters expect the superdelegates to vote for him. He has not been making friends with the DNC. They aren't going to switch their votes just because you asked.
Geoffrey Skelley ‏@geoffreyvs 5m5 minutes ago Virginia, USA
.@Taniel I just got Trump to 1237 via 86/95 in NY & 37 CDs in CA. But winning MT, NE, and/or SD would help him a lot.
"Just last week we were down 5 or 6 points in Wisconsin"?
What???!?!
"Just last week we were down 5 or 6 points in Wisconsin"?
What???!?! Does this man actually think this? That this win is "larger than anyone expected"? Seriously?
CNN commentators just destroying Sanders right now over his chances.
And it's about time.
After his Washington win, they were all on the HE'S GOT MOMENTUM! train.
It is. The closest poll had him at +8. He is probably winning by 15.
I think Hillary will be okay.
I couldn't care less what some last polls averaged at. Top-tier Sanders people were looking for a 20+ point blowout. If you were to copy-paste Wisconsin's demographics into Sanders' caucus performance, you'd be expecting a 30-40 point blowout. To claim that this is some massive and astonishing accomplishment is extremely disingenuous. "Yay, we kept pace to within 1-2 delegates!" is not a momentous event to brag about. I don't care if they is paid campaign staff. His brain needs to exist in reality. If he's representative of what Sanders hears from advisors on a day to day basis, his team is incompetent.It is. The closest poll had him at +8. He is probably winning by 15.
I'm flabbergasted that someone who worked on Obama's 08 campaign could say that Bernie's win here means that Hillary's a weak candidate. That makes no sense on any level.
That's different than him being down by a certain amount. That just means he wasn't as high as his numbers are now.
Still so happy 15% of those Bernie voters voted for Bradley!
If the minimum voting age was 21, this would be over by now.
If the minimum voting age was 21, this would be over by now.
If the minimum voting age was 21, this would be "over" by now.
(This is "over" by now.)
Honest question. Do you want more young people involved in the voting process or less?
I don't actually think so. Huckster's just weird.
hows it looking for Queen in Philly? You and Diablos have work to do. Bring as many old and black people to the polls as possible.
I don't actually think so. Huckster's just weird.
This makes me happy.
I hope it drives more voting.
That's different than him being down by a certain amount. That just means he wasn't as high as his numbers are now.
Still so happy 15% of those Bernie voters voted for Bradley!
I AM SO FUCKING PISSED OFF RIGHT NOW
Yeah but it brings the question of if Bernie is bringing in more youthful votes, is that a good thing? Or if because all us young people are crazy liberals that don't vote with our heads, we are effectively the same as the staunch 60's era conservatives that vote based on old religious morals.
Why?
hey ivy
got somethin to show ya