brainchild
Banned
Yeah, I mostly agree with this, and I think it's a solid post.
I think you can either argue that the letter of the rules was subverted or that the spirit of the rules was subverted.
Everybody seems to agree that the eventual delegate outcome reflected the will of the voters (which I feel like is even just factual so how would you disagree). So I think the "spirit of the rules" argument is kind of dead in the water.
So the argument seems to be about the letter of the rules. This is fine but, as I posted in the other thread, I think that people have just misunderstood the rules, and also I feel like it's a fundamentally weaker argument to say that even though things worked out for the best you are still mad about the process by which things worked out for the best, and then go on to argue that people should subvert the process to make things work out in your favor. Again, it strikes me as taking whatever argument is most effective for Bernie in a given situation, rather than actually having clear and supportable principles!
Wrong. My stance on this matter would not have changed even if the outcome was favorable to Bernie. That the outcome was as it should have been is just a coincidence. The conduct by both sides has been egregious and unacceptable.