Basileus777
Member
A Kasich vs Clinton map would probably look something like this:
Colorado would be the state to decide it.
Colorado would be the state to decide it.
What should I watch after Stranger Things?
All TV shows should be 8 episodes with 0 filler.
Until his sexist tendencies got the better of him. The fact is the entire field was flawed this time around, short of Huntsman jumping in.
No, I'm pointing out that the things that make him attractive to the general public are poison in the GOP primary. The Republicans need to find someone who can appeal to the base and then tack back to the center. So far Romney has done the best job of that.
Avatar the Last AirbenderWhat should I watch after Stranger Things?
All TV shows should be 8 episodes with 0 filler.
Perhaps.
Except the person you responded to was saying democrats were lucky Kasich wasn't the nominee. That's the reference--not his lack of ability to get through the primary.
Sahil Kapur ‏@sahilkapur
Monmouth poll finds that if @JohnKasich were the Republican nominee he'd be leading @HillaryClinton 57% to 33% in Ohio.
The thing about looking at paper is that it doesn't wilt on stage. His actual policies and experience would send the same people running for the hills given even a moment's mainstream scrutiny, and that's without him ginning up rural racists with clearer dogwhistles. Kasich being a viable alternative to anything is fantasyland. Romney without the winning smile, GW Bush without the charm.
Kasich has got to be the frontrunner for 2020 though, right? I feel like he's the only Republican that wasn't embarrassed or targeted and he's one of the few with some national recognition that didn't bend the knee to Trump. Cruz is dead in the water like Santorum or Huckabee imo and the big names this year (Jeb, Christie, and Rubio) were all embarrassed and I think are done. Ryan will get killed for his Trump stance and might lose his spot as Speaker and I think won't get it. Who else is left? Maybe Sandoval?
Do you think this Republican primary electorate would take KasichKasich has got to be the frontrunner for 2020 though, right? I feel like he's the only Republican that wasn't embarrassed or targeted and he's one of the few with some national recognition that didn't bend the knee to Trump. Cruz is dead in the water like Santorum or Huckabee imo and the big names this year (Jeb, Christie, and Rubio) were all embarrassed and I think are done. Ryan will get killed for his Trump stance and might lose his spot as Speaker and I think won't get it. Who else is left? Maybe Sandoval?
Kasich has got to be the frontrunner for 2020 though, right? I feel like he's the only Republican that wasn't embarrassed or targeted and he's one of the few with some national recognition that didn't bend the knee to Trump. Cruz is dead in the water like Santorum or Huckabee imo and the big names this year (Jeb, Christie, and Rubio) were all embarrassed and I think are done. Ryan will get killed for his Trump stance and might lose his spot as Speaker and I think won't get it. Who else is left? Maybe Sandoval?
I don't see who else can do it and eventually they have to get tired of losing like Democrats did in 88, right?Do you think this Republican primary electorate would take Kasich
Kasich has got to be the frontrunner for 2020 though, right? I feel like he's the only Republican that wasn't embarrassed or targeted and he's one of the few with some national recognition that didn't bend the knee to Trump. Cruz is dead in the water like Santorum or Huckabee imo and the big names this year (Jeb, Christie, and Rubio) were all embarrassed and I think are done. Ryan will get killed for his Trump stance and might lose his spot as Speaker and I think won't get it. Who else is left? Maybe Sandoval?
nah
Nobody is attacking Kasich, and compared to Trump he looks way better. He's still a pretty regressive guy and that would come out more in a GE campaign
I don't see who else can do it and eventually they have to get tired of losing like Democrats did in 88, right?
A Kasich vs Clinton map would probably look something like this:
Colorado would be the state to decide it.
In 2020 the GOP will control both the House and Senate. That's not really losing.
Dems had the House and Senate in 1988 too.In 2020 the GOP will control both the House and Senate. That's not really losing.
I don't see who else can do it and eventually they have to get tired of losing like Democrats did in 88, right?
Yea, but 2020 is when redistricting happens. If the Dems win big that year, which they very well could if Hillary does a good job, that'd set the table for the next 20 years.
2020 should be better than 2016 for Hillary. She gets much more popular when she's actually in office, and I think she'll do a good job.
Maybe even better than Obama. Obama wasted a couple of years trying to play nice with the GOP. Hillary won't even bother with that.
Against a generic D or better Kasich would have struggled, but I think practically any Republican other than Trump would have beaten Hillary this time, even Cruz or Bush (but maybe not Carson).
A story that will probably be buried after the election by obituaries on Trump is the hubris of Hillary running in 2016 when she knew her email problems, foundation, and paid speeches would be big problems. She jeopardized the Democratic party's chances and we just got lucky with Trump.
Obama had 2 years to work with a Congress that could get stuff done, Hillary likely won't even have that. She'll be running for reelection after 4 more years of gridlock and 12 years of Democratic rule. And she won't be facing Trump. It'll be a hell of a lot tougher than this year.
Against a generic D or better Kasich would have struggled, but I think practically any Republican other than Trump would have beaten Hillary this time, even Cruz or Bush (but maybe not Carson).
A story that will probably be buried after the election by obituaries on Trump is the hubris of Hillary running in 2016 when she knew her email problems, foundation, and paid speeches would be big problems. She jeopardized the Democratic party's chances and we just got lucky with Trump.
Obama had 2 years to work with a Congress that could get stuff done, Hillary likely won't even have that. She'll be running for reelection after 4 more years of gridlock and 12 years of Democratic rule. And she won't be facing Trump. It'll be a hell of a lot tougher than this year.
2020 should be better than 2016 for Hillary. She gets much more popular when she's actually in office, and I think she'll do a good job.
Maybe even better than Obama. Obama wasted a couple of years trying to play nice with the GOP. Hillary won't even bother with that.
I expect the 2020 R candidate clowns to be either worse than Trump
A story that will probably be buried after the election by obituaries on Trump is the hubris of Hillary running in 2016 when she knew her email problems, foundation, and paid speeches would be big problems. She jeopardized the Democratic party's chances and we just got lucky with Trump.
Obama had 2 years to work with a Congress that could get stuff done, Hillary likely won't even have that. She'll be running for reelection after 4 more years of gridlock and 12 years of Democratic rule. And she won't be facing Trump. It'll be a hell of a lot tougher than this year.
Didn't her approval ratings go up after the Benghazi hearings though?This isn't really true. She gets more popular when she's not attacked. Which isn't going to stop.
I'm worried about 2020 and democratic apathy in going for a 4th term in a year where shit matters all up and down the ballot.
I'm sure they'll be a clown, but they won't be worse than Trump who is the worst candidate in over 50 years. And honestly he might be worse than Goldwater.
Like a tiny bit but still not to her time when the GOP literally didn't give a crap about her.Didn't her approval ratings go up after the Benghazi hearings though?
This isn't really true. She gets more popular when she's not attacked. Which isn't going to stop.
I'm worried about 2020 and democratic apathy in going for a 4th term in a year where shit matters all up and down the ballot.
(everyone said what I was going to say, Adam)
The shorter version is that Kasich only looks like a threat in a world after which Trump is the nominee, not before. After Jeb, after Rubio, after Christie, after Ted Cruz and after Rick Freakin Perry.
So he's a decent person, trained in old-school mainstream political savvy, with governor experience from a big battleground state. Yet all of these were true before Trump.
The only reason we're talking about him now is because he held onto the primary to see if he could win Ohio and because Trump is legit fucking scary. In all other contexts there's a reason this guy couldn't beat out two schmucks from Florida and two creepers from Texas. It's because he's a forgettable, boring mess with a terrible record.
This is revisionist history. Kasich was talked about as dangerous well before Trump was the nominee.
This is revisionist history. Kasich was talked about as dangerous well before Trump was the nominee.
So was Scott Walker
So was Scott Walker
I know this is asking a lot, but I'd love to see proof that anyone was 'scared' of a psycho like Kasich with a face like Forbes' until Jeb and Rubio imploded. Because ... I don't think there is any evidence.
Not calling you out specifically, but he only sounds reasonable when compared to the most dangerous main party nominee ever. Hillary might get 380 against Trump, but wouldn't fare much worse against Kasich.
Walker was always a lightweight who kept getting lucky.
So was Scott Walker
So? Who has been claiming that he could actually get through a primary, the discussion has mostly been focused on how he can't.