Actually, I wonder about that and if it wouldn't be better for her to take the spotlight to try and bury the "pivot" and make it as confusing as possible to people what Drumpf actually stands for at this point.
I also can't help but think about primary Drumpf's media "strategy." I say "strategy" of course because by now it's obvious that he's an attention-whoring narcissistic idiot who very likely had no strategy at all and only did it for the attention and self-validation. Nonetheless, one of the things he did during the primary that very likely did contribute to his success there was that he was constantly all over the major news networks, leaving little screentime for anyone else.
But now of course, aside from Fox News, Drumpf has backed away from that strategy and I feel that creates a huge opening for Clinton against Drumpf. Just have both herself and Kaine (not just on Univision, but also in general) just use primary Drumpf's strategy against him and bombard CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, etc, with constant call-ins and interviews and stuff which will then get covered in everything else and each other as well.
Of course, I definitely understand why Clinton doesn't do that, given her history with the press and how it makes complete and total sense from her perspective to be so cautious and guarded about that. However, the more I think about it, the more I come to the conclusion that while she's right to mistrust the
press's motives that that doesn't matter that much because the
people don't actually care that much about what exactly is said or the press trying that stuff. The more important thing is just
being there and showing up and answering questions at all, regardless of what is said. It's like the whole Louisiana flood thing. I think most people realize that there isn't actually much Donald Drumpf or President Obama can do
in person to help or make a difference to the recovery effort that they couldn't accomplish otherwise, the important thing is just
being there regardless in a public way, and that people like to see that and reward that regardless of any impact and I wonder if this is a similar type of thing.
Of course, if Clinton were more public with the press, of course they'd continue to press her about her e-mails and the Clinton Foundation, and while she's right to be nervous about that type of thing given her past experience at the same time all that stuff is just baked in at this point. People just don't care about the e-mails at all at this time, so if the press tries to nail her on that stuff if she were to be more public I don't think people would care either way.
On the other hand, her being more public with interviews, regardless of what the press tries, will help her to actually get her message and stop everything from people simply anti-Hillary or anti-Drumpf and I think that's an important factor that's being looked with how negative most of the ads against each other and such have been so far and how people respond better to positive ads than negative ads. In particular, her being more public and just bombarding everything with interviews and stuff would give her a chance to talk about not just where stands on particular issues each time, but also talk about stuff like the importance of
Congress as well and use that as a chance to talk about not only how she looks competitive in places like Georgia,
South Carolina, and Missouri, and how competitive not only she herself looks in places like that but also how many Senate and House races are competitive right now and really use that to fire up the base and hopefully get them out and motivated to vote.
Of course, that's what she does at rallies, which is wonderful, but bombarding the airwaves with that same message resonates in a way that rallies and campaign events
alone can't, which is why I feel it would be a worthwhile thing to do for that reason alone. Just having her and Kaine constantly giving that same message and beating that drum in each and every interview, making it clear not only how well they themselves are doing in a number of states, but also the importance of Congress and those races and the shot D's have the powerful message it would sent against everything Donald Drumpf stands for to make that happen would be a very powerful message that alone would make it worth considering in my opinion and that they have so much more to gain by doing that at this point than they have to lose.
To be clear, I'm not diablosing about this whatsoever--Clinton's doing more than fine at this point and
either strategy, either letting Drumpf be Drumpf and running down the clock,
or being more public and bombarding the airwaves with interviews are both valid approaches and should work just fine and it's not a big deal what she actually chooses. I'm just curious and fascinated by what Drumpf did in the primaries, how he backed off from that strategy and the potential opening it creates for Clinton to use what Drumpf initially used to great success completely against him. I'm also curious how Drumpf would
respond if she did that and if he would be totally jealous of that attention and the idea of the spotlight being on her instead of him and if that would potentially bait him to going back on CNN etc himself and potentially saying crazy stuff on air because he wouldn't be able to handle Clinton using her strategy against him and having the attention.
And while either strategy is fine and everything's good, I'm just really taken by how the D's actually have the shot to at least briefly take control of both houses of Congress here and how Clinton and the D's should be taking full advantage of that and doing
everything they can to make that happen, even if it involves some risk since even a temporary opportunity like that doesn't come around that often. And I feel that Clinton and Kaine together constantly bombarding the major networks with interviews and taking the time to talk about all the places their competitive and Congressional races in each and every one would be able to draw out some additional excitement and reason to turn out to vote that's currently not there and that rallies alone can't do, and even an additional 1%-2% turnout in those Congressional races can naturally make a tremendous, tremendous difference and be worth whatever the press would be able to pull and the risks of it.
Of course, I definitely understand why she doesn't do that given her history but the idea just fascinates me and I wish that she would or at the very least have Kaine out there on the airwaves as a public face for the campaign doing that because it just seems like, after thinking about it, there's just so much more to gain there than to lose, especially in the Congressional races, and how that's the type of thing that independents and undecideds reward for just "being there" regardless of what she says and help with her trustworthiness and other negatives as well. And it's not a vital thing for her personally and I don't think it hurts her not doing it, but I'm just fascinated by the idea and think she and the D's would have a lot to gain by doing so so I personally feel it would be worth the while.
But I'm just a know-nothing psychology undergraduate, so whatever~