Tranqueris
Banned
Dana Boente will take the job. He's the deputy AG.
Attorney General Dana Boente..
For the second time since Trump became President.
Dana Boente will take the job. He's the deputy AG.
what if we get a non racist replacement for sessions? wishful thinking?
omg these are too good, getting flashbacks to working at the libraryMeanwhile at the White House:
CNN... I can't
breaking news:
Justice Department: Sessions misled senate
Sessions misled senate
Breaking news
Sessions didn't mislead senate
Make up your fucking minds
but they have justice dept "statement" (sessions spot I assume) and justice department sources. But neither detail is articulated so it looks like they are report the JD said he both did and did not mislead.That was the statement from the DOJ. They are just reporting what the DOJ said.
So he just practically admitted they were discussing the election.
The weasel there is "about the 2016 election." He could claim he was talking about anything else.
what if we get a non racist replacement for sessions? wishful thinking?
"Didn't disclose" is so weasel-worded it drives me nuts. He lied. It's on tape.
I give Sessions until Monday morning or until the next oppo drops on him. I'm sure there's more.
"Didn't disclose" is so weasel-worded it drives me nuts. He lied. It's on tape.
"Didn't disclose" is so weasel-worded it drives me nuts. He lied. It's on tape.
"minor lapse in judgment" is what they will ultimately go with.There is no way to prove what they discussed in the meeting in his office, unless they recorded it. If they did and they want to prove that he didn't talk about the campaign and such, then go ahead.
The main point is, he didn't disclose the meeting, He clearly remembers it enough to say that they didn't talk about the election.
There is no way to prove what they discussed in the meeting in his office, unless they recorded it. If they did and they want to prove that he didn't talk about the campaign and such, then go ahead.
The main point is, he didn't disclose the meeting, He clearly remembers it enough to say that they didn't talk about the election.
When Puzder stepped down for Labor secretary Trump replaced him with someone sane. Dude can't handle losing so he kinda caves when shit gets real. So its possible here too.
Reminds me of "Trump recorded having extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005", leading to the extremely easy "locker room talk" defense.
Are you sure you should be so confident in saying this is gonna doom Sessions?
Are you sure you should be so confident in saying this is gonna doom Sessions?
Either it dooms Sessions and creates the image of a Trump administration that's corrupt, but balanced by the GOP...
Or, it doesn't doom him, and the GOP are shown once again to put party/power over country. And the GOP and Trump administration look even worse in the long-run.
It depends on if the GOP continue to run this along partisan lines. At some point, though, they'll realise that standing behind Trump no matter what will screw them and the US over, so it's just when they decide to stand up.
There is no "good" option for Trump/GOP. There's only degrees of bad.
The "good" GOP politicians also have to worry about how this looks in 2 years if they didn't come out against it. It's the easiest play in the world to just run attack ads against every Rep that didn't call for investigations, at the least. It's all well and good to stonewall and cover for each other while you have the House, but if that swings in 2018, then heads start rolling and committees start digging like crazy.
but they have justice dept "statement" (sessions spot I assume) and justice department sources. But neither detail is articulated so it looks like they are report the JD said he both did and did not mislead.
I realize it be bad optics but is it possible for Trump to pardon Sessions to keep him safe/in the cabinet? Is the only thing that would prevent that the riots in the streets it would cause?
I realize it be bad optics but is it possible for Trump to pardon Sessions to keep him safe/in the cabinet? Is the only thing that would prevent that the riots in the streets it would cause?
The day that trump was sworn in.So when do Dems go nuclear and just cause deafening amounts of noise about this administration needing the impeachment hammer?
2AM there now... should have something in about 90 minutes.Man I really can't wait for Donald's tweets this morning.
I realize it be bad optics but is it possible for Trump to pardon Sessions to keep him safe/in the cabinet? Is the only thing that would prevent that the riots in the streets it would cause?
1. White House counsel orders staffers not to delete anything Russia-related
2. That WH memo is leaked by 3 officials working in administration now, who ask to remain anonymous (snort). This means: subpoena arrived.
3. Then we get event 2) which is Schiff interviewed by Chris Matthews and tweeting that House has reached agreement on Russian investigation
4. The document Schiff tweets states in no uncertain terms that they'll investigate ALL aspects of Russia hacking incl. collusion with Trump
5. Of note is the quote from Nunes at the end of the official document Schiff tweeted. Total 180 from his lame "nothing here" attempt.
6. This means Dems in committee played hardball, and Schiff in particular. They left Nunes NO choice. Committee is BIPARTISAN. Key point.
7. Last but not least, the @nytimes drops the bomb that the Obama administration rushed to preserve all intel on Russia collusion
8. Which means "Obama knew and he made sure intelligence got all the help he could give". MORE IMPORTANTLY, new confirmed bits in story.
9. EU intelligence told US that Trump associates met with Russians in Netherlands, England and other places. These details were undisclosed.
10. In short, we, your EU allies, most likely have what @20committee calls SIGINT on said meetings, so Trump & associates? Are screwed.
11. If you think these three events are unrelated? Think again. IC knows how to time its own leaks, and that's how NYT broke the story.
12. And since when it rains, it pours: https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...05eda-feac-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?
13. And now Nancy Pelosi is asking Sessions to resign AND WSJ is reporting that Sessions is under FBI investigation
Every day we get new revelations just makes me angrier and angrier about Obama. I mean seriously, unless all of this turns out to be completely nothing I don't see how Obama is not forever maligned as the President who put the security and stability of the entire world in jeopardy all because he was afraid that calling out treason would been seen as 'partisan' behavior.
He wasn't afraid.
He was told, directly to his face by Mitch McConnel, that the republicans would not in possible way co-operate with this, and that if he did it Mitch would walk onto the White House lawn and call it a partisan stunt to protect Hillary because of her emails.
The republicans don't care about the country, and were more than happy to go along with Russian interference as long as they won and got their tax cuts.
Statement needs to be orange. You can't break white statements in Danganronpa!Think we can start to get cabinet members to turn on one another? I want to imagine their meetings like a trial in Dangaronpa with Trump just watching and laughing.
Tangentially related that I loved from the campaign and what I'm going to start using at my go-to butheremails.gif.
Yeah and it even though he knew, there was no smoking gun evidence and lots of investigation left to go. Sounds like Obama did all he could given the circumstances.Obama always played the long game. He made a lot of long game moves here so it may not be readily apparent what decisions he made until later. Like the spreading of intelligence thing