ShadowSwordmaster
Banned
Really? Which thread is THAT happening in?
The New Orleans monument thread. It's one or two people doing it.
Really? Which thread is THAT happening in?
Well then doesn't that mean that in order to keep Rosenstein in check we just have to find the dirt on him before the Trump side finds the dirt?
You mean the war of northern aggression.We are at a point when people on GAF are posting that the American Civil War is a both sides are the same argument.
And this is why Klobauchar and Warren should not run. They make me go to sleep.Hogwash. You know what you need? Charisma. That's it. Period. That is the only thing the American voting public cares about. Bill Clinton notched a win over a decorated war hero because he was effortlessly charming. The Republicans then ran a desiccated pineapple scion against him and got crushed. So they come back with a charming goofball. And even though Gore was clearly more intelligent and had better policies, he loses, because he's perceived as "boring." Then the Democrats bring in John Kerry, a reanimated husk of Balsa wood. They're only able to recapture the Presidency through an inspirational guy who is so charming he makes Bill Clinton look like Alex Jones. McCain had more experience, he's a war hero, and people arguably liked his policies more... but he doesn't stand a chance against Obama's personality. So let's get someone who is reasonably charming but hopelessly out of touch... nope, not good enough, sorry Mitt.
Now 2016 is weird. Because Donald Trump is not "charming" in any way, shape or form. But apparently people like his style of presentation. Hillary, by contrast, is reserved; even her most ardent supporters say she needs to try to be more "likable" on the campaign trail. Because it turns out that the only thing "undecided" voters actually care about is personality. Period. We all know what the policies of the Republicans and Democrats are, and frankly, there's a hefty amount of overlap. The only way to get people out to actually vote is someone who is inspirational. All this nonsense about policy? Stop it. Yes, it's important to have good policy, but the people you're trying to convince, the swing voters, have never once demonstrated that is what sways their decision on election day. They vote for a cult of personality. So find a charming articulate son of a bitch and the policy pieces will fall into place.
This is the biggest problem in our country. The people will vote for style over substance every time. Democrats almost universally have the substance over Republicans at this point. We need to inspire. And, sadly, that usually means meaningless platitudes rather than actual policy.
You mean the war of northern aggression.
What? Where?We are at a point when people on GAF are posting that the American Civil War is a both sides are the same argument.
What? Where?
Growing up in the South, I feel like those people have always been out there. I mean, a major talking point of Southern apologists was wage slavery, which is basically a form of whataboutism/both-sides-ism. Maybe the country at large wasn't exposed to this stuff as much as I was.We are at a point when people on GAF are posting that the American Civil War is a both sides are the same argument.
Now we can't call those people traitors now?
It's unsettling that this thread is back to moving so slowly after 2 weeks of chaos...
I wish I could pin this to my wall.Hogwash. You know what you need? Charisma. That's it. Period. That is the only thing the American voting public cares about. Bill Clinton notched a win over a decorated war hero because he was effortlessly charming. The Republicans then ran a desiccated pineapple scion against him and got crushed. So they come back with a charming goofball. And even though Gore was clearly more intelligent and had better policies, he loses, because he's perceived as "boring." Then the Democrats bring in John Kerry, a reanimated husk of Balsa wood. They're only able to recapture the Presidency through an inspirational guy who is so charming he makes Bill Clinton look like Alex Jones. McCain had more experience, he's a war hero, and people arguably liked his policies more... but he doesn't stand a chance against Obama's personality. So let's get someone who is reasonably charming but hopelessly out of touch... nope, not good enough, sorry Mitt.
Now 2016 is weird. Because Donald Trump is not "charming" in any way, shape or form. But apparently people like his style of presentation. Hillary, by contrast, is reserved; even her most ardent supporters say she needs to try to be more "likable" on the campaign trail. Because it turns out that the only thing "undecided" voters actually care about is personality. Period. We all know what the policies of the Republicans and Democrats are, and frankly, there's a hefty amount of overlap. The only way to get people out to actually vote is someone who is inspirational. All this nonsense about policy? Stop it. Yes, it's important to have good policy, but the people you're trying to convince, the swing voters, have never once demonstrated that is what sways their decision on election day. They vote for a cult of personality. So find a charming articulate son of a bitch and the policy pieces will fall into place.
This is the biggest problem in our country. The people will vote for style over substance every time. Democrats almost universally have the substance over Republicans at this point. We need to inspire. And, sadly, that usually means meaningless platitudes rather than actual policy.
The more local it is, the more local issues and money matter. You can win town elections with just blanket signage.so does the cult of personality that plays out in Presidential races apply on a state and local factor?
Is Spicer or someone from his rotating cast of idiots doing a press conference today?
I wish I could pin this to my wall.
Of the 2020 crowd I think it's Booker.
I just watched his speech at CAP, maybe it's because Trump has just lowered my expectations so much but he comes off as pretty well-read.Booker makes me nervous. I get the feeling that he has Obama's charisma but not the deep knowledge and desire to learn about different subjects. All style and no substance. And the left would tear him apart over the Wall St ties
He's a great speaker. Look at the DNC speech he gave it was inspiring. But, and others have said this, he strikes me as the Dem's Rubio. Young, attractive, charismatic minority who gives great speeches and projects tons of energy. And he's definitely more well-read than Rubio, but I haven't seen a lot from him that shows the wonkishness that Obama had underneath that charisma. Plus the triple threat of Wall Street, the Zuckerberg Newark schools debacle, and some general mismanagement during his time in Newark just makes me doubt his abilities. Shit the whole shoveling snow and hand-delivering diapers thing during the blizzard that makes everyone love him was his fault because he couldn't properly distribute emergency services around the city. Still, 2020 is a long way away, maybe he can convince meI just watched his speech at CAP, maybe it's because Trump has just lowered my expectations so much that he comes off as pretty well-read.
I wish I could pin this to my wall.
Of the 2020 crowd I think it's Booker.
And this is why Klobauchar and Warren should not run. They make me go to sleep.
Booker absolutely does not have Obama charismaBooker makes me nervous. I get the feeling that he has Obama's charisma but not the deep knowledge and desire to learn about different subjects. All style and no substance. And the left would tear him apart over the Wall St ties
Franken is the clear candidate to me in 2020 if he runs.
I'm still not sold on Kamala. She hasn't impressed me in any of her interviews since Trump took office.
I wish I could pin this to my wall.
Of the 2020 crowd I think it's Booker.
What about a Kamala-Franken ticket?
Biden, Franken, Kander are about the top of the heap when it comes to charisma for democrats.
I'd flip thatWhat about a Kamala-Franken ticket?
What about a Kamala-Franken ticket?
Im just not seeing a reason to put her ahead of him at this moment. She has some time though to put it together, to be fairWhat about a Kamala-Franken ticket?
Franken-Brown
I want Al as an attack dog, not the lead.
I get the feeling our 2020 candidate won't be debating Trump.I want whatever it takes to get to watch Al Franken completely dismember Trump in a debate.
Exactly.I get the feeling our 2020 candidate won't be debating Trump.
I get the feeling our 2020 candidate won't be debating Trump.
Dan Merica‏Verified account @danmericaCNN 13m13 minutes ago
Huma Abedin has filed for divorce from Anthony Weiner, per a source familiar with the filing, but the filing happened prior to today.
I get the feeling our 2020 candidate won't be debating Trump.
I agree if things get too serious for Trump he'll probably resign and get Pence to pardon him. Then he can spend the rest of his life bitching on twitter about how great he would have been if only those mean ol' Dumbocrats didn't push him out.Yuuuuuuup.
Hell, apparently the co-author of The Art of the Deal recently told Anderson Cooper in an interview he did recently that he thinks Trump is going to resign to try and save face from "losing."
Still, I'm liking Franken a lot. The idea of a Franken-Harris ticket sounds nice to me, especially if it's to prep Harris to run for President after 8 years of Franken as President.