I can't stand Hillary Clinton but am baffled why anyone would be upset that she gave a post-election interview, months after the election. Do I think it's a good idea that losing candidates with no political future slowly disappear to make room for the next batch of candidates? Yea of course. But Hillary tweeting a couple times and giving an interview isn't some outrageous or unprecedented level of public participation. And no, I don't think this has anything to do with sexism. A lot of people don't like her and are still bitter about the election (and primary).
If I was a republican I could understand being upset about Mitt Romney buying influence and attempting to prop himself up as some power broker. Obviously people on the far right agree with that position but overall republicans seem pretty fine with Romney popping up here or there.
I actually completely agree with you (except for the fact that I actually still like Hillary).
I don't think its a huge deal. I don't think its outrageous or unprecedented. I just want to make clear my position that these kinds of appearances shouldn't be the norm, and that she should NOT be a national voice for the party.
Pretty sure that's all Crab and I are saying.