RustyNails
Member
I see that he hasnt tweeted about the terrorist attack in London. I wonder why??
I see that he hasnt tweeted about the terrorist attack in London. I wonder why??
SCOTUSblog‏Verified account
@SCOTUSblog
SCOTUS will review Wisconsin political gerrymandering dispute
According to Democrats close to the contest, the high early voting turnout has rendered Tuesdays result less predictable than expected. And that unpredictability has party leaders stung by criticism from liberal activists for not spending enough money on earlier special elections this year in Kansas and Montana urging activists not to be disappointed by a tight race that ends in defeat.
Their concern is that anything less than victory could dampen the partys torrid energy and cash flow, with the next round of House races still nearly a year-and-a-half away.
Gonna be real pissed if Gorsuch ends up being the deciding vote in SCOTUS allowing this.Interesting
The reality is, sadly, I dont see much difference between the Trump administration and the (Barack) Obama administration, the outgoing chairman of the House Oversight Committee told Sinclair Broadcast Group.
In many ways, its almost worse because were getting nothing, and thats terribly frustrating and, with all due respect, the attorney general has not changed at all. I find him to be worse than what I saw with Loretta Lynch in terms of releasing documents and making things available. I just, thats my experience, and thats not what I expected.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/19/ossoff-handel-georgia-special-democrats-239698
In the case of GA-6, the high EV benefits Handel. Tomorrow will be very interesting.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/19/ossoff-handel-georgia-special-democrats-239698
In the case of GA-6, the high EV benefits Handel. Tomorrow will be very interesting.
Giant shitbag Jason Chaffetz decides to grow a spine and shit all over Trump and Sessions as he escapes his position of House Oversight Chairman:
We just don't know what else to do.
-- Donald Trump is DESTROYING Jon in the final days of the election.
-- Nate Silver predicted Jon has the same chance to win as Hillary in 2016.
-- But Nate Silver was WRONG. Hillary LOST.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/19/ossoff-handel-georgia-special-democrats-239698
In the case of GA-6, the high EV benefits Handel. Tomorrow will be very interesting.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/19/ossoff-handel-georgia-special-democrats-239698
In the case of GA-6, the high EV benefits Handel. Tomorrow will be very interesting.
The high EV doesn't necessarily benefit Handel, I don't know how you're reading that. The unpredictability comes from the fact that many early voters are new voters so we don't have a firm grasp on how they'll vote.
The high EV doesn't necessarily benefit Handel, I don't know how you're reading that. The unpredictability comes from the fact that many early voters are new voters so we don't have a firm grasp on how they'll vote.
Is he going to send his stooges to GA like he did Kansas?
As a rule of thumb, early voters are older than the norm, and as another rule of thumb, older voters tend Republican, though. The reason high early voting is normally good for Democrats is indirect; it's because high early voting is normally a good prediction of high in-person voting, and Democratic voters are normally less likely to vote than Republican ones.
As a rule of thumb, early voters are older than the norm, and as another rule of thumb, older voters tend Republican, though. The reason high early voting is normally good for Democrats is indirect; it's because high early voting is normally a good prediction of high in-person voting, and Democratic voters are normally less likely to vote than Republican ones.
I think Pence has been there, and Price was there over the weekend.
Don't day-of voters also tend to be older though?
Well you better get to clicking your heals together and start ringing some bells because we don't win shit unless they doAll voters are old. Young voters are mythical faeries that don't exist.
Don't day-of voters also tend to be older though?
Know what we haven't had in a while? Oppo.
That sucks, if justices by 5-4 were willing to put a stay on the district court decision finding partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional, then it is hard to see them ruling against the gerrymandering.
Well, it's certainly hard to see four of them ruling against it. But the argument was designed for Kennedy, so maybe Kennedy just wants to hear the argument?
That sucks, if justices by 5-4 were willing to put a stay on the district court decision finding partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional, then it is hard to see them ruling against the gerrymandering.
It's popular amongst the voters of the party it currently favorsIf SCOTUS isn't going to try to end gerrymandering wouldn't it just be smart to try and get ballot initiatives about it everywhere? I don't think gerrymandering is really popular with anyone except the politicians it protects.
So did I miss anything in the past 5 days? I went on a mini vacation. =)
Wasn't it Thomas who flipped on the last gerrymander effort? Or are we relying on Kennedy to hopefully not be garbage?
Once they passed the Russia stuff and the hearings were over there wasn't much need to play ball.Looks like the Dems are realizing there's not much to lose by fighting the Senate Trumpcare:
https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/876821347657240577
Bracing myself for Ossoff disappointment.
Yes. NC I believe. There was just too much evidence race played a factor. In this instance we're hoping Kennedy flips. In a previous decisions he alluded that a way to measure the effects of gerrymandering was something he needed. This case attempts to do that
There's no disappointment with this race. Either it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year, or it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year with a bonus extra congressman.
The only disappointing result for tomorrow would be Ossoff losing by 15+ points.
There's no disappointment with this race. Either it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year, or it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year with a bonus extra congressman.
The only disappointing result for tomorrow would be Ossoff losing by 15+ points.
Honestly pretty much this.
A benefit of Ossoff losing would probably be that it may lull the GOP into a false sense of security for 2018.
That sucks, if justices by 5-4 were willing to put a stay on the district court decision finding partisan gerrymandering unconstitutional, then it is hard to see them ruling against the gerrymandering.
There's no disappointment with this race. Either it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year, or it's a good night showing 2018 is going to be a good year with a bonus extra congressman.
The only disappointing result for tomorrow would be Ossoff losing by 15+ points.
Taegan Goddard (@politicalwire)
McConnell Will Force Health Care Vote Next Week https://t.co/CewjeTwoYZ
No way the CBO score is done by next week, so I guess he's trashing the filibuster?