It's not "both sides-ism". Extremists are godawful.This is some bad both sides-isms.
It's not "both sides-ism". Extremists are godawful.This is some bad both sides-isms.
Because it is.
The far flanks are both full of monstrously stupid ideas fueled by dogmatic devotion to ideology.
Centrism and moderation are not inherently virtuous. But pushing for change while being careful to implement good change and not just shit that doesn't work but feels good to know-nothings is.
OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
I would call standing one's ground and refusing to move farther right to appeal to crazies, as the GOP have, a virtue, yes.
By the way, have we gotten any sanctions news today?
OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
(do those countries exist anymore?)This is actually the definition of conservatism in countries where conservatives have not been overtaken by reactionaries and nationalists.
At what point does Trump decide that the importance of firing Sessions outweighs the criticism he'll get from doing it? When he gets wind that Mueller's gotten some damning financial info?
OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
Sessions sure as hell ain't leaving of his own accord.
Bernie is just announcing it. Good on the Parliamentarian for enforcing the rules for once.
While I don't agree with how whyamihere presented his argument, does PoliGAF haven any sympathy for those who are freaking out with this process, some in comparable medical conditions?
(do those countries exist anymore?)
It's not "both sides-ism". Extremists are godawful.
Reid's former assistant says that McCain's voting for MTP and then voting against any bills would be consistent with his speech because MTP used to be a formality. So he may have voted for MTP as he believes that is normal order, and then will vote against bills because of how they were drawn up.
I'm not holding my breath, however.
Reid's former assistant says that McCain's voting for MTP and then voting against any bills would be consistent with his speech because MTP used to be a formality. So he may have voted for MTP as he believes that is normal order, and then will vote against bills because of how they were drawn up.
I'm not holding my breath, however.
Reid's former assistant says that McCain's voting for MTP and then voting against any bills would be consistent with his speech because MTP used to be a formality. So he may have voted for MTP as he believes that is normal order, and then will vote against bills because of how they were drawn up.
I'm not holding my breath, however.
Didn't this come up last night where they don't have to follow the Parliamentarian by written rules, only un-written?
OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
Kinda, but going down that path is practically the same as nuking the filibuster entirely.
But they don't. Discredited extreme ideas don't go away, they float out there just waiting for another generation to pick them up because they feel good. The trajectory of Gay Rights is not what the debate on the majority of topics looks like.I mean.. you realize its all relative right? Things that are extreme become normal over time.
I will eat sardines covered in peanut butter if he votes against the final product with Collins and Murkowski.
Nice.OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
I think the MTP is going to bury that story pretty quicklyHot take: Trump's approval will take a measurable dip and it could be because of five or six (hundred) different things but it will turn out to be because of his Boy Scouts speech.
Didn't this come up last night where they don't have to follow the Parliamentarian by written rules, only un-written?
Hot take: Trump's approval will take a measurable dip and it could be because of five or six (hundred) different things but it will turn out to be because of his Boy Scouts speech.
I will also eat said sardines, or at least change my avatar (I'm a vegetarian!).
I would submit that our good-ol-boy agreements have held us back because we kept respecting them for a whole decade+ past the point where the GOP abandoned them.i really love how the main difference between our constitution and the constitution of the country immediately to our north is that their checks on abuses of government power aren't literally just agreements among good ol' boys
OH MY GOD
This is good, Bernie.
Good catch Bernie
I think the MTP is going to bury that story pretty quickly
But they don't. Discredited extreme ideas don't go away, they float out there just waiting for another generation to pick them up because they feel good. The trajectory of Gay Rights is not what the debate on the majority of topics looks like.
I do love getting to play the Trust Game with my government so much.
Is he wrong, though?
Yeah, people are (understandably) losing their shit over his speech to the BS. Even people who don't engage in politics are chiming in with a resounding "WTF was that!"Hot take: Trump's approval will take a measurable dip and it could be because of five or six (hundred) different things but it will turn out to be because of his Boy Scouts speech.
So are these rules that can easily be overturned/overruled? Or do these rules actually have teeth here?
PBY never sees the irony in his posts. That was the most PBY post I've seen lol
So BCHA is done for now, full repeal is likely dead. That just leaves skinny repeal right?
Quick, someone tell me if Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate or just an asshole
Quick, someone tell me if Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate or just an asshole
Quick, someone tell me if Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate or just an asshole
Quick, someone tell me if Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate or just an asshole
How does this argument make any sense in a world where the filibuster exists and is regularly used/abused? I don't see it.
The political spectrum does not consist solely of social justice issues!Isn't the entire trajectory of social justice basically extreme ideas becoming normalized and in many cases winning out?
Quick, someone tell me if Tulsi Gabbard is a moderate or just an asshole